TU Siqi, XIE Feiyan, AO Kangwei, et al.A high efficiency oil wash spacer for shale gas wells in Changning oilfield[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2022, 39(1):82-86 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.01.014
Citation: TU Siqi, XIE Feiyan, AO Kangwei, et al.A high efficiency oil wash spacer for shale gas wells in Changning oilfield[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2022, 39(1):82-86 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.01.014

A High Efficiency Oil Wash Spacer for Shale Gas Wells in Changning Oilfield

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.01.014
  • Received Date: 2021-09-27
  • Accepted Date: 2021-08-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2021-11-07
  • Publish Date: 2022-05-06
  • The oil based drilling fluids used in horizontal drilling of shale gas wells in Changning oilfield are poorly compatible with the cement slurries, resulting in the mixture of the drilling fluid and cement slurry flocculated and difficult to displace from the annular spaces. To solve this problem, an oil wash additive BCS-130L was developed based on the types, functioning principles and HLB levels of surfactants. A high efficiency oil wash spacer was developed using BCS-130L, which is suitable for use in Changning. This spacer, with its density ranging between 1.5 g/cm3 and 2.4 g/cm3, can work normally at temperatures between 70 ℃ and 180 ℃; it cleans the oil based drilling fluids held up on the surface of the annular spaces and reverses the wettability of the surfaces. The spacer has good rheology and stability and is compatible with the drilling fluid and the cement slurry in use, it has satisfied the requirements of shale gas well cementing in Changning oilfield.

     

  • [1]
    赵常青,谭宾,曾凡坤,等. 长宁-威远页若气示范区水平井固井技术[J]. 断块油气田,2014,21(2):256-258.

    ZHAO Changqing, TAN Bin, ZENG Fankun, et al. Cementing technology of horizontal well in Changning-Weiyuan shale gas reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2014, 21(2):256-258.
    [2]
    邹才能,赵群,丛连铸. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(1):2-3.

    ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CONG Lianzhu. Development progress, potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1):2-3.
    [3]
    房恩楼, 李浩然, 张浩, 等. 一种低温低密度可固化隔离液的研制与性能评价[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2020, 37(1): 86-92.

    FANG Enlou, LI Haoran, ZHANG Hao, et al. Development and performance evaluation of a low temperature low density solidifiable spacer fluid[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(1): 86-92.
    [4]
    郭永宾, 吴志明, 杨玉豪, 等. 深水油气井环空带压预防弹性隔离液体系[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(5): 654-658.

    GUO Yongbin, WU Zhiming, YANG Yuhao, et al. An elastic spacer for preventing trapped pressure in annulus of deepwater oil and gas wells[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(5): 654-658.
    [5]
    谭文礼,王翀,徐玲. BCS隔离液室内研究[J]. 石油天然气学报,2006(1):81-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2006.01.026

    TAN Wenli, WANG Chong, XU Ling. Laboratory study of BCS spacer fluid[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2006(1):81-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2006.01.026
    [6]
    谢飞燕, 王翀, 刘爱萍, 等. 用于评价固井冲洗液冲洗效率的设备: CN 204152463 U[P]. 2014-10-28.

    XIE Feiyan, WANG Chong, LIU Aiping, et al. Equipment for evaluating the flushing efficiency of cementing flushing fluid : CN 204152463 U [P]. 2014-10-28.
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 王雪山,邹亦玮,张福铭,田野. 适用于LAS系统的全液体隔离液体系. 钻井液与完井液. 2024(04): 489-495 . 本站查看
    2. 徐大伟,汪晓静,徐春虎,魏浩光,常连玉. 且深1井盐层尾管超高温高密度固井水泥浆技术. 钻井液与完井液. 2024(05): 622-629 . 本站查看
    3. 何斌斌,柳华杰,张汝涛,张军义,张洪旭,殷慧,吴桐. 一种固井前置液冲洗效率的评价方法. 钻井液与完井液. 2024(06): 772-777 . 本站查看
    4. 张凡. 井筒高含水型微乳液冲洗液研究. 钻井液与完井液. 2023(01): 89-95 . 本站查看
    5. 于永金,夏修建,王治国,廖富国,刘斌辉,丁志伟. 深井、超深井固井关键技术进展及实践. 新疆石油天然气. 2023(02): 24-33 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-06020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.1 %FULLTEXT: 28.1 %META: 68.8 %META: 68.8 %PDF: 3.1 %PDF: 3.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.8 %其他: 2.8 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 29.2 %上海: 29.2 %东营: 0.1 %东营: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %休斯顿: 0.2 %休斯顿: 0.2 %北京: 2.6 %北京: 2.6 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %华盛顿州: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %大庆: 0.2 %大庆: 0.2 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.2 %巴音郭楞: 0.2 %巴黎: 0.2 %巴黎: 0.2 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %新德里: 0.2 %新德里: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %杭州: 0.2 %杭州: 0.2 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.2 %泸州: 0.2 %洛杉矶: 0.2 %洛杉矶: 0.2 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 30.9 %芒廷维尤: 30.9 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %苏黎世: 0.1 %苏黎世: 0.1 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 12.9 %西宁: 12.9 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贵阳: 1.5 %贵阳: 1.5 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %遂宁: 0.1 %遂宁: 0.1 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %驻马店: 8.8 %驻马店: 8.8 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他ChinaIndiaUnited States[]上海东营临汾休斯顿北京华盛顿州南京台州呼和浩特哈密唐山大庆天津宣城巴彦淖尔巴音郭楞巴黎常德张家口成都新乡新德里昆明晋城杭州武汉沈阳沧州泸州洛杉矶济南深圳烟台盘锦石家庄绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏黎世衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遂宁遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治青岛驻马店齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1121) PDF downloads(50) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return