Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Tian Xiaoqing, Xu Gege, Han Dong, et al.Cfd-dem-based study on particle-size matching of bridging particles in multi-scale fractures[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(0):1-11
Citation: Tian Xiaoqing, Xu Gege, Han Dong, et al.Cfd-dem-based study on particle-size matching of bridging particles in multi-scale fractures[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(0):1-11

CFD-DEM-Based Study on Particle-Size Matching of Bridging Particles in Multi-Scale Fractures

  • Received Date: 2026-06-10
  • Accepted Date: 2026-09-08
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-08-28
  • Available Online: 2026-09-23
  • To address the limitation of traditional particle-size matching rules in lost circulation control for multi-scale fractured formations, coupled CFD-DEM simulations and laboratory simulated fracture-plugging evaluation experiments were performed on multi-scale wedge-shaped fractures. A dimensionless stability coefficient S was defined from the pressure-drop response. Gaussian process regression (GPR) was then used to establish the response relationship of S with fracture aperture and bridging particle-size ratio, forming a particle-size matching chart for multi-scale fractures. The results show that particle plugging-layer morphology and pressure-bearing response vary with fracture size. Suitable particle-size ratios allow bridging particles to form stable packing zones inside fractures and exhibit high pressure-bearing capacity, whereas smaller or larger ratios lead to deep migration, erosion-induced instability, or false plugging at the fracture inlet. The preferred particle-size ratio is 0.25-0.40 for 0.2-1 mm fractures and 0.35-0.45 for 1.5-2.5 mm fractures. The chart agrees with experimental data, with R2=0.8674, indicating good fitting accuracy within the research range.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    蒋炳, 严君凤, 张统得. HTD-3型高温堵漏材料研制及性能评价[J]. 钻探工程, 2022, 49(1): 57-63.

    Jiang Bing, Yan Junfeng, Zhang Tongde. Development and performance evaluation of HTD-3 high temperature plugging material[J]. Drilling Engineering, 2022, 49(1): 57-63.
    [2]
    艾昆. 东胜气田锦30井区下石盒子组裂缝诊断及堵漏对策[J]. 当代化工研究, 2025(12): 105-107. doi: 10.20087/j.cnki.1672-8114.2025.12.034

    Ai Kun. Diagnosis and leak prevention technology for cracks in the lower Shihezi formation of the Jin 30 well area in Dongsheng gas field[J]. Modern Chemical Research, 2025(12): 105-107. doi: 10.20087/j.cnki.1672-8114.2025.12.034
    [3]
    谢坤, 程前, 刘长龙, 等. 油气田刺激响应性材料应用现状及前景展望[J]. 精细化工, 2024, 41(7): 1478-1493, 1518.

    Xie Kun, Cheng Qian, Liu Changlong, et al. Application status and prospects of stimuli-responsive materials in oil and gas fields[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2024, 41(7): 1478-1493,1518.
    [4]
    汪海阁, 乔磊, 杨雄, 等. 中石油页岩油气工程技术现状及发展建议[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(10): 1552-1564.

    Wang Haige, Qiao Lei, Yang Xiong, et al. Current status and development recommendations for CNPC's shale oil and gas engineering technology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 1552-1564.
    [5]
    Abrams A. Mud design to minimize rock impairment due to particle invasion[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1977, 29(5): 586-592.
    [6]
    黄立新, 罗平亚. 裂缝性储集层的屏蔽式暂堵技术[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 1993(3): 53-57.

    Huang Lixin, Luo Pingya. Shielded temporary plugging technology for fractured reservoirs[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute (Social Science Edition), 1993(3): 53-57.
    [7]
    Hands N, Kowbel K, Maikranz S, et al. Drill-in fluid reduces formation damage, increases production rates[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 1998, 96(28): 65.
    [8]
    崔迎春. 裂缝性储层屏蔽暂堵分形理论的研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2002, 22(2): 45-47.

    Cui Yingchun. Research on the shielding temporary plugging fractal theory of fractured reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2002, 22(2): 45-47.
    [9]
    许成元, 张敬逸, 康毅力, 等. 裂缝封堵层结构形成与演化机制[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1): 202-210.

    Xu Chengyuan, Zhang Jingyi, Kang Yili, et al. Structural formation and evolution mechanisms of fracture plugging zone[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 202-210.
    [10]
    Lin Chong, Taleghani A D, Kang Yili, et al. A coupled CFD-DEM numerical simulation of formation and evolution of sealing zones[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208: 109765.
    [11]
    闫霄鹏, 邓嵩, 彭浩平, 等. 裂缝地层多粒径刚性颗粒封堵离散元模拟[J]. 常州大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 36(6): 12-18.

    Yan Xiaopeng, Deng Song, Peng Haoping, et al. Discrete element simulation of multi-sized rigid particles plugging mechanism in fractured formation[J]. Journal of ChangZhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 36(6): 12-18.
    [12]
    孔二伟, 王利锋, 韩子辰, 等. 裂缝型漏失地层钻井液防漏堵漏数值模拟研究[J]. 钻探工程, 2025, 52(4): 46-53.

    Kong Erwei, Wang Lifeng, Han Zichen, et al. Numerical simulation study on leakage prevention and sealing of fractured formation drilling fluids[J]. Drilling Engineering, 2025, 52(4): 46-53.
    [13]
    Lin Chong, Xu Qicong, Han Liexiang, et al. Fracture sealing performance of granular lost circulation materials at elevated temperature: A theoretical and coupled CFD-DEM simulation study[J]. Petroleum Science, 2024, 21(1): 567-581.
    [14]
    Meng Qingsheng, Liu Yongsheng, Cheng Wenbo, et al. Plugging mechanism of preformed particle gels in fractured formation: Fracture plugging simulation[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2025, 255: 214119.
    [15]
    李洁, 冯奇, 张高峰, 等. 介观尺度下裂缝内堵漏颗粒封堵层形成与破坏机理CFD-DEM 模拟[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2022, 39(6): 721-729.

    Li Jie, Feng Qi, Zhang Gaofeng, et al. CDF-DEM simulation of the formation and failure mechanisms of plugging layers formed by plugging particles in fractures at mesoscale[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2022, 39(6): 721-729.
    [16]
    王羽歌, 苏丹丹, 田永军, 等. 破碎带地层堵漏剂性能及堵漏机理研究[J]. 应用化工, 2025, 54(9): 2303-2309, 2315.

    Wang Yuge, Su Dandan, Tian Yongjun, et al. The performance and plugging mechanism of plugging agent in fractured zone formation[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2025, 54(9): 2303-2309,2315.
    [17]
    许成元, 阳洋, 蒲时, 等. 基于高效架桥和致密填充的深层裂缝性储层堵漏配方设计方法研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 534-544.

    Xu Chengyuan, Yang Yang, Pu Shi, et al. Design method of plugging formula for deep naturally fractured reservoir based on efficient bridging and compact filling[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 534-544.
    [18]
    张世锋, 王相, 崔新颖, 等. 基于改进理想充填理论的堵漏颗粒粒度分布设计方法[J]. 常州大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 33(3): 54-59.

    Zhang Shifeng, Wang Xiang, Cui Xinying, et al. Modified ideal packing theory to optimize size distribution of plugging particle for fracture lost circulation control[J]. Journal of ChangZhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 33(3): 54-59.
    [19]
    雷少飞, 孙金声, 白英睿, 等. 裂缝封堵层形成机理及堵漏颗粒优选规则[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(3): 597-604.

    Lei Shaofei, Sun Jinsheng, Bai Yingrui, et al. Formation mechanisms of fracture plugging zone and optimization of plugging particles[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(3): 597-604.
    [20]
    张帅. 多尺度裂缝性地层漏失机理及堵漏配方研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2023.

    Zhang Shuai. Study on lost circulation mechanism and control formulation in multi-scale fracture formation[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2023.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(17)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return