YANG Juesuan, HOU Jie. A New Method of Simulating Micro Fractures in Shale and Plugging Evaluation Experiment[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2017, 34(1): 45-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.01.008
Citation: YANG Juesuan, HOU Jie. A New Method of Simulating Micro Fractures in Shale and Plugging Evaluation Experiment[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2017, 34(1): 45-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.01.008

A New Method of Simulating Micro Fractures in Shale and Plugging Evaluation Experiment

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.01.008
  • Received Date: 2016-11-07
  • Publish Date: 2017-01-31
  • There are many methods available presently for the simulation of micro fractures in Shale. All these methods have limitations, and are unable to trulysimulate the hydration and dispersion processes of shales in contact with water at HTHP conditions. To solve this problem, several simulation methods, such as the smooth steel block simulation method, sand bed plugging experiment method, simulation with artificial fracture (on split rocks) method and transparent tampered glass simulation method etc. were analyzed, and based on the analysis, a new method has been developed. In thenew method, a standard core plug is obtained by dry drilling samples,and artificial fractures are then made in it.The surface of the artificial fractures is covered with tinfoil of different thickness to simulate micro fractures of 10-100 μm in width. The core plug is put into a core holder that is connected with dynamic filter press, and a device for evaluating the capacity of plugging micro fractures in shale is formed. The assembly of the device, the experimental procedure, the function and the advantages of the device are introduced in this paper. An equation for the calculation of the width of micro facture is presented, and the equivalent widths of micro fractures are calculated through conversion of accurately measured data. Laboratory experiment has shown that this simulation method has high precision and good repeatability. This method can be used not only to simulate the hydration, dispersion and swelling of shale in contact with liquids, but also to simulate the plugging of micro fractures by drilling fluid on bottom hole at high temperature and high pressure. The simulation can be used to extensively study the plugging mechanism of micro fractures to provide reliable experiment method and datasupport for the selection of plugging agent and optimization of drilling fluid formulation.

     

  • [1]
    王建华,鄢捷年,苏山林. 硬脆性泥页岩井壁稳定评价新方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2004,28(2):28-30.

    WANG Jianhua,YAN Jienian,SU Shanlin.New method for evaluating borehole stability in brittle shale[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2004, 28(2):28-30.
    [2]
    徐同台,卢淑芹. 钻井液用封堵剂的评价方法及影响因素[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2009,26(2):60-62.

    XU Tongtai,LU Shuqin,HE Ruibing,et al. Methods for evaluating drilling fluid sealing and plugging agents and the influential factors[J]. Drilling Fluid &Completion Fluid,2009,26(2)60-62.
    [3]
    邱正松,王伟吉,董兵强,等. 微纳米封堵技术研究及应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2015,32(2):6-10.

    QIU Zhengsong, WANG Weiji, DONG Bingqiang, et al. Study and application of micro-nano plugging technology[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2015, 32(2):6-10.
    [4]
    陈德铭,刘焕玉,董殿彬,等. 伊拉克米桑油田AGCS27井裂缝性严重漏失堵漏新方法[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2015,32(2):55-57.

    CHEN Deming LIU Huanyu DONG Dianbin et al.Lost circulation control in well AGCS27, Misan Oilfield, Iraq[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2015,32(2):55-57.
    [5]
    余维初,苏长明,鄢捷年. 高温高压动态堵漏评价系统[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2009,26(1):20-22.

    YU Weichu,SU Changming,YAN Jienian. HTHP dynamic system for lost circulation evaluation[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2009,26(1):20-22.
    [6]
    范钢,张宏刚. 深层裂缝性储层防漏堵漏实验评价研究[J]. 探矿工程,2008,24(7):80-83.

    FAN Gang,ZHANG Honggang.Evaluation studies on the leakage proof and blocking experiment of the deep fractured reservoir[J].Exploration Engineering(Rock & Soil Drilling and Tunneling),2008,24(7):80-83.
    [7]
    石秉忠,胡旭辉,高书阳,等. 硬脆性泥页岩微裂缝封堵可视化模拟试验与评价[J]. 石油钻探技术,2014, 42(3):32-37.

    SHI Bingzhong,HU Xuhui,GAO Shuyang.Visulization sealing simulation test and evalution of hard brittle shale microfracture[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2014, 42(3):32-37.
    [8]
    张洪伟, 左凤江, 李洪俊, 等. 微裂缝封堵剂评价新方法及强封堵钻井液配方优选[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2015, 32(6):43-45

    , 49. ZHANG Hongwei, ZUO Fengjiang, LI Hongjun,et al. Method for evaluation of plugging of nano-micron fractures[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2015, 32(6):43-45, 49.
    [9]
    李松, 康毅力, 李大奇, 等. 裂缝性地层H-B流型钻井液漏失流动模型及实验模拟[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2015, 37(6):57-62.

    LI Song,KANG Yili,LI Daqi,et al.Flow model and experimental simulation for leak-off of H-B flow-pattern drilling fluid in fractured formation[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2015,37(6):57-62.
  • Relative Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 周双君,柳新国,段江,白杨,郭晓冰,兰晓云. 微裂缝模拟新方法及承压封堵能力评价实验研究及应用. 当代化工研究. 2023(09): 115-117 .
    2. 刘治. 复合材料封堵技术在外漏井治理施工中的应用. 采油工程. 2023(02): 47-53+89-90 .
    3. 陈修平,高雷雨,刘景涛,胡云磊,李家学,石祥超. 顺北油气田却尔却克组井壁失稳机理及应对措施. 钻井液与完井液. 2021(01): 35-41 . 本站查看
    4. 左富银,苏俊霖,李立宗,赵洋,曾意晴. 有机纳米封堵剂的研究现状及存在问题分析. 化学世界. 2020(11): 733-737 .
    5. 杨决算. 裂缝性泥页岩地层封堵材料优选方法研究与应用. 西部探矿工程. 2019(04): 103-106 .
    6. 于雷,张敬辉,李公让,赵怀珍,刘天科. 低活度强抑制封堵钻井液研究与应用. 石油钻探技术. 2018(01): 44-48 .
    7. 杜新军. 雷家致密油水平井钻井液对策研究. 当代化工研究. 2018(01): 16-17 .
    8. 邓明毅,刘洋洋,谢刚,赵洋. 钠蒙脱土结合水的热分析定量研究方法. 钻井液与完井液. 2018(02): 17-22 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(10)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-060510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.4 %FULLTEXT: 28.4 %META: 69.1 %META: 69.1 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %China: 1.1 %China: 1.1 %Rochester: 0.4 %Rochester: 0.4 %[]: 0.1 %[]: 0.1 %上海: 32.3 %上海: 32.3 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %克拉玛依: 0.4 %克拉玛依: 0.4 %北京: 12.2 %北京: 12.2 %南充: 0.1 %南充: 0.1 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %吉林: 0.2 %吉林: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %圣何塞: 0.1 %圣何塞: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %张家口: 2.2 %张家口: 2.2 %德阳: 0.7 %德阳: 0.7 %成都: 1.5 %成都: 1.5 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %海东: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.2 %濮阳: 0.2 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.1 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.1 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 24.0 %芒廷维尤: 24.0 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %西宁: 9.4 %西宁: 9.4 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %许昌: 0.1 %许昌: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %邢台: 0.1 %邢台: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %驻马店: 9.2 %驻马店: 9.2 %其他ChinaRochester[]上海伊利诺伊州克拉玛依北京南充台州吉林哈尔滨圣何塞大庆张家口德阳成都晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉海东濮阳盘锦石家庄美国伊利诺斯芝加哥芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁西安许昌贵阳运城邢台重庆长治青岛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (887) PDF downloads(279) Cited by(18)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return