Volume 43 Issue 3
Jun.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YAO Xuyang, ZENG Tao, WANG Tongwei, et al.Effects of oil-based and water-based drilling fluids on fracture propagation pressure[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(3):331-339 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.005
Citation: YAO Xuyang, ZENG Tao, WANG Tongwei, et al.Effects of oil-based and water-based drilling fluids on fracture propagation pressure[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(3):331-339 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.005

Effects of Oil-Based and Water-Based Drilling Fluids on Fracture Propagation Pressure

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.005
  • Received Date: 2025-11-19
  • Accepted Date: 2025-12-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-12-01
  • Available Online: 2026-06-12
  • Publish Date: 2026-06-12
  • Lost circulation and wellbore instability have been encountered in drilling the Permian fractured formations in the sag west to the well Pen-1 in the Junggar Basin. To understand how oil-based/water-based drilling fluids affect the propagation pressure of a fracture, a comparative analysis was conducted on the effects of oil-based/water-based drilling fluids on the propagation pressure of the fracture. Physical simulation experiments on the propagation of core fractures were conducted through rock mechanical test, analysis of rock physical parameters as well as drilling fluid property test, and the law of the integrated action of the rock properties and drilling fluid properties on the propagation of fractures was systematically investigated. The conclusions of the experiments are as follows: ① fracturing the fractured cores with oil-based and water-based drilling fluids to observe the magnitude of the propagation pressure of the fractures, and it was found that the propagation pressure of the fractures measured in tests with oil-based drilling fluids is remarkably higher than that measured in tests with water-based drilling fluids. ② It was revealed that the drilling fluid viscosity is the primary factor controlling the propagation pressure of a fracture, and its importance exceeds the filtration property of the drilling fluid. High drilling fluid viscosity hinders the effective propagation of the pressure inside the fracture, hence significantly increasing the propagation pressure. ③ It was clarified that rock permeability is the prerequisite for the drilling fluid filtrates to form a “pressure drop zone” at the tip of a fracture and hence to promote the propagation. For oil-based drilling fluids, although having strong wetting capacity, their high viscosity and extremely low filtration rate work together to suppress the formation of the “pressure drop zone”, thereby masking the wettability potential. ④ Based on the experimental results, the contribution of each factor to fracture propagation pressure is quantified, the importance of these factors is listed as this: drilling fluid viscosity > rock permeability > filtration property > brittleness index > wettability > porosity. This research reveals the core mechanisms of oil-based and water-based drilling fluids in affecting the propagation pressure of a fracture, clarifies the key control factors and their relative importance, and provides an important theoretical support to the scientific selection of drilling fluid types and the formulation of control strategy for wellbore stability in safely drilling fractured formations.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    何立成, 唐波. 准噶尔盆地超深井钻井技术现状与发展建议[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2022, 50(5): 1-8.

    HE Licheng, TANG Bo. The up to date technologies of ultra-deep well drilling in Junggar basin and suggestions for further improvements[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(5): 1-8.
    [2]
    何文军, 费李莹, 阿布力米提·依明, 等. 准噶尔盆地深层油气成藏条件与勘探潜力分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(1): 189-201.

    HE Wenjun, FEI Liying, ABLIMITI Yiming, et al. Accumulation conditions of deep hydrocarbon and exploration potential analysis in Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(1): 189-201.
    [3]
    孙金声, 杨景斌, 白英睿, 等. 裂缝性地层桥接堵漏技术发展综述与展望[J]. 石油科学通报, 2023, 8(4): 415-431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2023.04.032

    SUN Jinsheng, YANG Jingbin, BAI Yingrui, et al. Review and prospect of bridging plugging technology in fractured formation[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2023, 8(4): 415-431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2023.04.032
    [4]
    康毅力, 田国丰, 游利军, 等. 缝面摩滑: 深部裂缝性地层钻井液漏失加剧的新机制[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2022, 50(1): 45-53.

    KANG Yili, TIAN Guofeng, YOU Lijun, et al. Friction & sliding on fracture surfaces: a new mechanism for increasing drilling fluid leakage in deep fractured reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(1): 45-53.
    [5]
    卢运虎, 陈勉, 安生. 页岩气井脆性页岩井壁裂缝扩展机理[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2012, 40(4): 13-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.04.003

    LU Yunhu, CHEN Mian, AN Sheng. Brittle shale wellbore fracture propagation mechanism[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(4): 13-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2012.04.003
    [6]
    李之军, 朱茂, 智晶子, 等. 微生物无固相钻井液体系构建及其固壁作用机理研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2023, 51(4): 187-194.

    LI Zhijun, ZHU Mao, ZHI Jingzi, et al. Study on construction of microbial solid-free drilling fluid system and its borehole wall enhance-ment mechanism[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2023, 51(4): 187-194.
    [7]
    雷强, 唐洪明, 张烈辉, 等. 钻井液在致密砂岩中裂缝的侵入深度模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 97-104.

    LEI Qiang, TANG Hongming, ZHANG Liehui, et al. Invasion depth model for drilling fluids in fractures in dense sandstones[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2018, 40(4): 97-104.
    [8]
    代锐, 马传华, 黄洪林, 等. 裂缝性地层呼吸效应特征实验研究[J]. 钻探工程, 2025, 52(1): 93-101. doi: 10.12143/j.ztgc.2025.01.013

    DAI Rui, MA Chuanhua, HUANG Honglin, et al. Experimental study on the characteristics of respiration effect in fractured formations[J]. Drilling Engineering, 2025, 52(1): 93-101. doi: 10.12143/j.ztgc.2025.01.013
    [9]
    潘丽燕, 郝丽华, 刘凯新, 等. 玛湖风城组高含盐储层水力压裂裂缝扩展规律[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2023, 19(4): 20-28.

    PAN Liyan, HAO Lihua, LIU Kaixin, et al. Fracture propagation law of hydraulic fracturing in High-Salinity reservoir of Fengcheng formation in Mahu[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2023, 19(4): 20-28.
    [10]
    邵长跃, 潘鹏志, 赵德才, 等. 流量对水力压裂破裂压力和增压率的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2411-2421, 2484. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2145

    SHAO Changyue, PAN Pengzhi, ZHAO Decai, et al. Effect of pumping rate on hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure and pressurization rate[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2411-2421,2484. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2145
    [11]
    江梦雅, 王江涛, 刘龙松, 等. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷石炭系—二叠系天然气特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(3): 138-151. doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230312

    JIANG Mengya, WANG Jiangtao, LIU Longsong, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of natural gas of Carboniferous-Permian in western well Pen-1 sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(3): 138-151. doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20230312
    [12]
    刘之的, 汤小燕, 于红果, 等. 基于岩石力学参数评价火山岩裂缝发育程度[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(11): 20-21, 26.

    LIU Zhide, TANG Xiaoyan, YU Hongguo, et al. Evaluation of fracture development in volcanic rocks based on rock mechanical parameters[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(11): 20-21,26.
    [13]
    STARFIELD A M, CUNDALL P A. Towards a methodology for rock mechanics modelling[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1988, 25(3): 99-106.
    [14]
    延新杰, 李连崇, 张潦源, 等. 岩石脆性对水力压裂裂缝影响的数值模拟实验[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(3): 116-121.

    YAN Xinjie, LI Lianchong, ZHANG Liaoyuan, et al. Numerical simulation experiment of the effect of rock brittleness on fracture propagation of hydraulic fracturing[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017, 24(3): 116-121.
    [15]
    李邵军, 匡智浩, 邱士利, 等. 岩石脆性评价方法研究进展及适应性探讨[J]. 工程地质学报, 2022, 30(1): 59-70.

    LI Shaojun, KUANG Zhihao, QIU Shili, et al. Review of rock brittleness evaluation methods and discus-sion on their adaptabilities[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2022, 30(1): 59-70.
    [16]
    RAMSAY J G. Folding and fracturing of rocks[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
    [17]
    HUCKA V, DAS B. Brittleness determination of rocks by different methods[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1974, 11(10): 389-392.
    [18]
    TARASOV B, POTVIN Y. Universal criteria for rock brittleness estimation under triaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2013, 59: 57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.011
    [19]
    李庆辉, 陈勉, 金衍, 等. 页岩脆性的室内评价方法及改进[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(8): 1680-1685.

    LI Qinghui, CHEN Mian, JIN Yan, et al. Indoor evaluation method for shale brittleness and improvement[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(8): 1680-1685.
    [20]
    RICKMAN R, MULLEN M, PETRE E, et al. A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: all shale plays are not clones of the barnett shale[C]//Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Denver, Colorado, 2008: SPE-115258-MS.
    [21]
    SUN S Z, WANG K N, YANG P, et al. Integrated prediction of shale oil reservoir using Pre-Stack algorithms for brittleness and fracture detection[C]//Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference. Beijing, 2013: IPTC-17048-MS.
    [22]
    侯冰, 刘庆, 耿智, 等. 裂缝性致密油藏地质-工程一体化开发[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(4): 480-484.

    HOU Bing, LIU Qing, GENG Zhi, et al. Integrated Geology-Engineering development technology for fractured tight oil reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(4): 480-484.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (54) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return