Volume 42 Issue 6
Dec.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HE Yu, HE Tianbao, FAN Tianyou, et al.Analysis of components of gas well blocking substances and study on a composite block removing system[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2025, 42(6):836-842 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.06.017
Citation: HE Yu, HE Tianbao, FAN Tianyou, et al.Analysis of components of gas well blocking substances and study on a composite block removing system[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2025, 42(6):836-842 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.06.017

Analysis of Components of Gas Well Blocking Substances and Study on a Composite Block Removing System

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.06.017
  • Received Date: 2025-07-31
  • Accepted Date: 2025-09-25
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-09-20
  • Available Online: 2025-12-08
  • Publish Date: 2025-12-08
  • Gas wells drilled in the Gaoshiti block of the Southern Sichuan Gas District have encountered serious formation blocking problem, resulting in significant decline in the gas production. To restore the gas production, blocking removing needs to be performed with blocking removing fluids in wells where reservoir formations are blocked. By analyzing the blockages taken from the wells with IR and XRD methods, the organic and inorganic components and their contents in the blockages were determined. Based on the blocking removing principles, a composite blocking removing system was formulated with xylene, 15% HCl and isopropnaol, and was then optimized for the material ratio. The effects of action time, solid/liquid ratio as well as temperature on the blocking removing performance of the blocking removing system were investigated. It was found that the blocking removing system formulated with m (xylene)∶m (15% HCl)∶m (isopropnaol) = 17.32∶25.99∶56.69 has the optimum blocking removing performance. At solid/liquid ratio of 1∶15 the efficiency of blocking removing is 90.25%, which is the highest efficiency. This composite blocking removing system can effectively dissolve the blockages found in the Gaoshiti block, and the residues after dissolution have smaller particle sizes, beneficial to discharging from where the formations are blocked. Wells operated with this blocking removing system have their gas production restored.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    文绍牧, 何润民, 敬兴胜, 等. 西南油气田天然气与新能源深度融合的路径探索[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2024, 53(5): 1-6.

    WEN Shaomu, HE Runmin, JING Xingsheng, et al. Exploration of the path for deep integration of natural gas and new energy in petro China southwest oil&gasfield company[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2024, 53(5): 1-6.
    [2]
    何小川, 李孜孜, 陈渝静, 等. 川渝地区天然气化学工业产业链价值提升路径与策略[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(12): 27-33. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.12.003

    HE Xiaochuan, LI Zizi, CHEN Yujing, et al. Path and strategy to enhance the value of natural gas chemical industry chain in Sichuan-Chongqing area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(12): 27-33. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.12.003
    [3]
    刘毅, 冯朋鑫, 常永峰, 等. 长庆气区关停气井挖潜措施技术与展望[J]. 钻采工艺, 2024, 47(3): 82-89.

    LIU Yi, FENG Pengxin, CHANG Yongfeng, et al. Potential tapping technology and prospect for shut-down gas wells in Changqing gas area[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2024, 47(3): 82-89.
    [4]
    何立成, 蓝强, 黄维安, 等. 有机缓释微乳酸高效解堵剂的制备及性能研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2022, 39(2): 259-264.

    HE Licheng, LAN Qiang, HUANG Weian, et al. Preparation and properties of slow-release organic acid micro-emulsion with high efficient plugging removal[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2022, 39(2): 259-264.
    [5]
    李善建, 杜进繁, 贺建英, 等. 天然气井井筒解堵工作液的研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2024, 53(1): 238-241.

    LI Shanjian, DU Jinfan, HE Jianying, et al. Research progress of natural gas well wellbore declogging working fluid[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2024, 53(1): 238-241.
    [6]
    ZHANG P. Review of synthesis and evaluation of inhibitor nanomaterials for oilfield mineral scale control[J]. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2020, 8: 576055. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.576055
    [7]
    YANG J, FENG Y Y, ZHANG B J, et al. A blockage removal technology for natural gas hydrates in the wellbore of an ultra-high pressure sour gas well[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2021, 8(2): 188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ngib.2020.09.017
    [8]
    刘振东, 孙天礼, 朱国, 等. 元坝高含硫气田井筒堵塞物分析[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2021, 17(3): 1-6.

    LIU Zhendong, SUN Tianli, ZHU Guo, et al. Analysis of wellbore blocking substances in Yuanba high-sulfur gas field[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2021, 17(3): 1-6.
    [9]
    YANG Q Y, ZHANG P, LI D X, et al. Blockage types of gas well and technical countermeasures for de-plugging in low-permeability tight gas reservoirs[C]//Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2023. Singapore: Springer, 2024: 95-109.
    [10]
    杨淑珍, 姚二冬, 陈庆, 等. 迪那2气田井筒高温解堵液体系[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2018, 35(1): 124-128.

    YANG Shuzhen, YAO Erdong, CHEN Qing, et al. Study on high temperature block removing fluids used on dina-2 Ges field[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2018, 35(1): 124-128.
    [11]
    ZHU T Y, YANG H B, JIANG H H, et al. Study on an emulsion-type blockage removal agent for heavy oil recovery enhanced by polymer[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2020, 89: 273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.05.023
    [12]
    SHI B W, WANG Z H, ZHANG Z W, et al. A state of the art review on the wellbore blockage of condensate gas wells: towards understanding the blockage type, mechanism, and treatment[J]. Lithosphere, 2022, 2022(Special 12): 8076631.
    [13]
    HOU Y, LI H, LIU R, et al. Application of reservoir blockage-relieving in low permeability carbonate of Jingbian gas-field[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2024, 2834(1): 012091. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2834/1/012091
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (79) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return