Study on Neutral Integrated Slick Water System for Acidification and Fracturing
-
摘要: 常规压裂作业后,通常采用酸化解除储层伤害,施工步骤多,经济性较差,研发能够实现压裂酸化一体化的液体体系具有重要的现实意义。通过测定中性且水溶性的脂类在不同温度和浓度条件下的有效生成H+浓度及对碳酸盐的溶蚀率,优选了自生酸压裂添加剂,并与滑溜水复配形成新型抑制与解除伤害的自生酸滑溜水压裂液体系;采用摩阻仪和压力传导实验对该体系的摩阻、伤害抑制与解除能力进行研究。研究结果表明:自生酸常温下基本不生酸,在储层温度下具有明显的缓速生酸效果,最终生酸浓度高达8%的等效盐酸,溶蚀碳酸岩量为0.41 g/mL;优选的自生酸与滑溜水配伍性能良好,减阻率达到72.3%;压力传导实验表明传统滑溜水产生了34.8%的储层伤害,该体系不仅不产生伤害,处理后的岩心反而高出原始岩心渗透率29.9%,体现出明显的一体化增产改造效果。Abstract: After conventional fracturing operations, acidification is usually used to relieve the damage of the reservoir. There are many operating steps and poor economic performances. The development of a liquid system that can realize both fracturing and acidification has practical significance. In this paper, a class of neutral and water-soluble lipids with the ability to produce H+ ions were selected. The effective generating H+ concentration and the carbonate dissolution rate of these self-generating acids under different temperature and concentration conditions were measured. Then the optimized self-generating acid was combined with slickwater to form a new neutral integrated slickwater system with acidification function. The frictional drag tester and pressure conduction experiment are used to study the drag reduction, scale inhibition and damage relief capabilities of the system respectively. The research results show that self-generating acid does not generate acid at room temperature, and has obvious slow-rate acid generation capacity at reservoir temperature. The final generating acid concentration is as high as 8% equivalent hydrochloric acid, and the ability of dissolving carbonate rock is 0.41 g/mL. The compatibility of optimized self-generating acid and slick water is good, and the drag reduction rate reaches 72.3%. The pressure conduction experiment shows that traditional slickwater produces 34.8% of the reservoir damage. In striking contrast, this new fracturing fluid not only produced no damage, but also improved permeability of the treated core as high as 29.9%. The new fluid proved the obvious integrated stimulation effect of acidification and fracturing.
-
Key words:
- Hydraulic fracturing /
- Self-generating acid /
- Damage relief /
- Integrated stimulation
-
[1] 刘大玉, 张军闯. 压裂液伤害治理技术[J]. 钻采工艺, 1999(1):3-5. LIU Dayu, ZHANG Junchuang. Treatment technology of fracturing fluid damage[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 1999(1):3-5. [2] 梁文利, 赵林, 辛素云. 压裂液技术研究新进展[J]. 断块油气田, 2009, 16(1):95-98+117. LIANG Wenli, ZHAO Lin, XIN Suyun. New progress in fracturing fluid technology research[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2009, 16(1):95-98+117. [3] 韩演涛. 酸化压裂技术在油气田开发中的现状及应用[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2011(11):175。HAN Yantao. Present status and application of acidizing fracturing technology in oil and gas field development[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2011(11):175。 [4] 武文涛. 浅析油气田开发中酸化压裂技术的应用[J]. 化工管理, 2016(1):207 WU Wentao. Application of acidizing fracturing technology in oil and gas field development[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2016(1):207 [5] 刘平礼, 兰夕堂, 李年银, 等. 酸预处理在水力压裂中降低伤害机理研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(3):150-155. LIU Pingli, LAN Xitang, LI Nanyin, et al. Study on damage reduction mechanism of acid pretreatment in hydraulic fracturing[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition),2016,38(3):150-155. [6] 盖祥福, 李庆松. 齐平2区块酸化解除压裂液伤害的配方研究[J]. 采油工程文集, 2018(1):57-60, 93-94. GAI Xiangfu, LI Qingsong. Study on formulation of acidizing to remove fracturing fluid damage in qiping 2 block[J]. Collected Works Oil Extraction Engineering, 2018(1):57-60, 93-94. [7] 刘友权, 张燕, 王道成, 等. 用于碳酸盐岩储层的自生酸体系[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2015, 34(S1):165-167, 196. LIU Youquan, ZHANG Yan, WANG Daocheng, et al. Self-generating acid systems for carbonate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum,2015,34 (S1):165-167, 196. [8] 王晓磊, 柳海, 达勇, 等. 克拉美丽气田火山岩气藏储层改造技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2010, 30(2):63-65.WANG Xiaolei, LIU Hai, DA Yong, et al. Reservoir stimulation technology of volcanic gas reservoir in Kelameili gas field[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(2):63-65. [9] 陈赓良,黄瑛. 碳酸盐岩反应机理分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(1):104-108.CHEN Gengliang, HUANG Ying. Analysis of reaction mechanism of carbonate rock[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(1):104-108. [10] 王海涛, 李相芳, 伊向艺, 等. 白云岩储层酸压过程中酸液的滤失控制[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(12):62-64.WANG Haitao, LI Xiangfang, YI Xiangyi, et al. Control of acid fluid loss in dolomite reservoir during acid fracturing process[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(12):62-64. [11] 刘建平, 李止奉, 周晓湘. 一种咪唑啉缓蚀剂在碳钢表面成膜的电化学研究[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2003, 15(5):263-265.LIU Jianping, LI Zhifeng, ZHOU Xiaoxiang. Electrochemical study on film formation of imidazoline corrosion inhibitor at the surface of carbon steel[J]. Corrosion Science and Protection Technology, 2003, 15(5):263-265. [12] 张路锋, 周福建, 张士诚, 等. 塔里木克深致密砂岩气藏基质钻井液伤害评价[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(1):126-132.ZHANG Lufeng, ZHOU Fujian, ZHANG Shicheng, et al. Matrix damage evaluation of drilling fluid in Tarim Keshen tight sandstone gas reservoir[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(1):126-132.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 477
- HTML全文浏览量: 131
- PDF下载量: 31
- 被引次数: 0