留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

HEDP插层水滑石型缓凝剂的制备及作用机理

刘岩 杨增民 任强 刘景丽 曹洪昌 王菁 杨豫杭

刘岩,杨增民,任强,等. HEDP插层水滑石型缓凝剂的制备及作用机理[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2026,43(4):522-533 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.011
引用本文: 刘岩,杨增民,任强,等. HEDP插层水滑石型缓凝剂的制备及作用机理[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2026,43(4):522-533 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.011
Liu Yan, Yang Zengmin, Ren Qiang, et al.Preparation and mechanism of HEDP-intercalated hydrotalcite retarder[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(4):522-533 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.011
Citation: Liu Yan, Yang Zengmin, Ren Qiang, et al.Preparation and mechanism of HEDP-intercalated hydrotalcite retarder[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(4):522-533 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.011

HEDP插层水滑石型缓凝剂的制备及作用机理

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.011
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘岩,工程师,博士,毕业于中山大学,现在主要从事油田化学研究工作。电话 15626019015;E-mail:liuyan-bh@cnpc.com.cn

  • 中图分类号: TE256.6

Preparation and Mechanism of HEDP-Intercalated Hydrotalcite Retarder

  • 摘要: 为解决现有缓凝剂在大温差条件下顶部强度发展缓慢的问题,通过离子交换法将羟基乙叉二磷酸(HEDP)插入水滑石层间,制备了羟基乙叉二磷酸插层水滑石Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH,并将其作为大温差缓凝剂,在水泥浆体系中进行了性能测试。研究结果表明,Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH的最佳制备工艺为pH值为4.5,晶化温度为150 ℃,晶化时间为6 h。Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH层间的HEDP会在水泥颗粒的水化过程中被释放出来起到缓凝的作用,加量在0.3%~0.7%的范围内均能呈现稳定的缓凝效果,且随着Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH加量的增加,稠化时间整体出现增加的现象。 Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH能提高水泥的早期强度,掺量为0.3%、0.5%、0.7%时,水泥石1、3、7、14 d的强度均高于纯水泥,尤其是其1~3 d强度提升明显,3 d强度达到最大值,相对于纯水泥提高了92.9%~103.6%。新型插层水滑石材料Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH在水泥浆体系中具有缓凝效果,能够促进水泥石的早期强度发展。

     

  • 图  1  HEDP插层水滑石合成示意图

    图  2  不同工艺参数条件下合成的   Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH的XRD图

    图  3  Mg/Al-CO3-LDH以及pH值为4.5条件下合成的Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH的IR光谱

    图  4  不同pH值条件下合成的Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH的微观形貌

    图  5  不同加量Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH的稠化曲线

    图  6  不同配方水泥石90 ℃养护3 d后的XRD图

    图  7  水泥石的TG-DTG图

    图  8  90 ℃不同配方的3 d水泥石微观形貌

    表  1  G级油井水泥主要化学成分及质量分数

    化学
    成分
    质量
    分数/%
    化学
    成分
    质量
    分数/%
    化学
    成分
    质量
    分数/%
    Na2O0.23CaO61.79Fe2O34.15
    Al2O33.37SiO220.38损失2.61
    MgO1.95K2O0.45其他5.07
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  水泥浆配方

    配方 G级
    水泥/%
    水/
    %
    HEDP/
    %
    Mg/Al-
    HEDP-LDH/
    %
    G33S/
    %
    SXY-2/
    %
    消泡剂/
    %
    C00 100 44 0 0 1 0.5 0.2
    P03 100 44 0.3 0 1 0.5 0.2
    P05 100 44 0.5 0 1 0.5 0.2
    P07 100 44 0.7 0 1 0.5 0.2
    P10 100 44 1.0 0 1 0.5 0.2
    H03 100 44 0 0.3 1 0.5 0.2
    H05 100 44 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.2
    H07 100 44 0 0.7 1 0.5 0.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同晶化条件下Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH 和Mg/Al-CO3-LDH的晶格参数

    Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH d(003)/
    nm
    d(006)/
    nm
    d(009)/
    nm
    2θ(003)/
    (°)
    pH T/℃ t/h
    3.5 130 8 0.77 0.39 0.26 11.39
    140 7 0.78 0.39 0.26 11.29
    150 6 0.78 0.39 0.26 12.86
    4.0 130 8 0.89 0.44 0.25 9.80
    140 7 0.92 0.46 0.27 9.81
    150 6 0.90 0.45 0.26 9.75
    4.5 130 8 1.24 0.62 0.41 7.08
    140 7 1.20 0.60 0.40 7.34
    150 6 1.18 0.59 0.39 7.43
    Mg/Al-CO3-LDH 0.76 0.38 0.26 11.56
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH对油井水泥流动度及密度的影响

    试样ρ/(g·cm−3流动度/cm
    C001.9124.5
    H031.9024.0
    H051.9024.0
    H071.9124.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH对水泥浆流变性的影响

    Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH/
    %
    φ3/φ6/φ100/φ200/φ300/φ600 n K/
    (Pa·sn
    0 16/20/55/87/106/194 0.596 1.316
    0.5 16/22/60/92/115/204 0.573 1.649
    0.7 18/24/64/95/120/209 0.554 1.937
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  Mg/Al-CO3-LDH以及Mg/Al-TA-LDH对水泥浆稠化时间的影响

    配方 Mg/Al-CO3-LDH/% Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH/% T/
    p/
    MPa
    稠化
    时间/min
    C00 0 0 90 45 140
    H03 0 0.3 90 45 381
    H05 0 0.5 90 45 251
    H07 0 0.7 90 45 >600
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  不同配方水泥石抗压强度

    配方 养护
    温度/℃
    不同养护时间(d)的抗压强度/MPa
    1 3 7 14
    C00 90 17.76 20.04 25.98 27.50
    P03 90 0 16.40 18.29 22.46
    P05 90 0 16.86 16.83 19.70
    P07 90 0 17.47 22.20 28.34
    P10 90 0 9.42 12.33 15.20
    H03 90 28.92 40.81 39.42 32.36
    H05 90 32.84 38.66 34.82 35.16
    H07 90 34.66 36.04 34.26 31.68
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  8  Mg/Al-HEDP-LDH对不同顶底温差条件养护不同时间水泥石抗压强度的影响

    预制
    温度/℃
    p/MPa(60 ℃) p/MPa(90 ℃)
    24 h 48 h 72 h 24 h 48 h 72 h
    120 10.86 14.35 16.48 13.54 17.04 17.42
    140 7.95 11.66 16.35 12.12 15.26 17.20
    160 7.90 10.60 15.86 10.16 14.28 17.08
    180 6.24 10.36 15.48 8.24 12.38 16.98
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  9  90 ℃不同配方水泥石养护3 d的EDS能谱元素分析

    元素 区域A 区域B
    原子分数/% 质量分数/% 原子分数/% 质量分数/%
    C 8.47 15.94 9.03 15.78
    O 40.98 22.10 30.29 15.16
    Al 5.60 5.09 6.72 5.67
    Si 9.50 8.99 11.39 10.01
    Ca 47.88 35.45 43.57 53.38
    元素 区域C 区域D
    原子分数/% 质量分数/% 原子分数/% 质量分数/%
    C 1.54 3.48 2.02 0.85
    O 57.85 37.32 62.16 42.01
    Al 1.90 2.06 1.36 1.55
    Si 11.15 12.63 11.62 13.78
    Ca 27.55 44.52 24.00 40.64
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Wu X Z, Wan F L, Chen Z, et al. Drilling and completion technologies for deep carbonate rocks in the Sichuan basin: practices and prospects[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2020, 7(5): 547-556. doi: 10.1016/j.ngib.2020.09.012
    [2] 郑明贵, 李期. 中国2020-2030年石油资源需求情景预测[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(3): 286-296.

    Zheng Minggui, Li Qi. Scenario prediction of China's oil resource demand in 2020-2030[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2020, 35(3): 286-296.
    [3] Zhang D W. Development prospect of natural gas industry in the Sichuan basin in the next decade[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2022, 9(2): 119-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ngib.2021.08.025
    [4] 黄福喜, 汪少勇, 李明鹏, 等. 中国石油深层、超深层油气勘探进展与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(1): 86-96. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.01.008

    Huang Fuxi, Wang Shaoyong, Li Mingpeng, et al. Progress and implications of deep and ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in PetroChina[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(1): 86-96. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.01.008
    [5] 张超鹏, 陈立超, 张典坤, 等. 深层非常规油气固井材料发展现状及趋势浅析[J]. 世界石油工业, 2023, 30(6): 96-105. doi: 10.20114/j.issn.1006-0030.20231024001

    Zhang Chaopeng, Chen Lichao, Zhang Diankun, et al. Analysis on development status and trend of new cementing materials for deep unconventional oil and gas[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2023, 30(6): 96-105. doi: 10.20114/j.issn.1006-0030.20231024001
    [6] 贾承造, 王祖纲, 姜林, 等. 中国页岩油勘探开发研究进展与科学技术问题[J]. 世界石油工业, 2024, 31(4): 1-11.

    Jia Chengzhao, Wang Zugang, Jiang Lin, et al. Progress and key scientific and technological problems of shale oil exploration and development in China[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2024, 31(4): 1-11
    [7] Wang X R, Sun B J, Liu S J, et al. A coupled model of temperature and pressure based on hydration kinetics during well cementing in deep water[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4): 867-876. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60102-1
    [8] Qin J K, Pang X Y, Santra A, et al. Various admixtures to mitigate the long-term strength retrogression of Portland cement cured under high pressure and high temperature conditions[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 15(1): 191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.005
    [9] Guo S L, Bu Y H, Liu H J, et al. The abnormal phenomenon of class G oil well cement endangering the cementing security in the presence of retarder[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 54: 118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.057
    [10] 孙欣, 曾林. AMPS聚合物类油井水泥缓凝剂研究进展[J]. 青岛科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 36(S2): 1-3.

    Sun Xin, Zeng Lin. Research progress on AMPS polymer oil well cement retarder[J]. Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 36(S2): 1-3.
    [11] 谢云媚, 张晔, 马勇, 等. 基于AMPS的早强型缓凝剂的合成及性能[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2025, 42(3): 379-385. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.03.014

    Xie Yunmei, Zhang Ye, Ma Yong, et al. Synthesis and properties of an early-strength retarder based on AMPS[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2025, 42(3): 379-385. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.03.014
    [12] 邹亦玮, 代丹, 王义昕, 等. 有机膦酸盐缓凝剂异常增稠油井水泥浆作用机理[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2025, 42(1): 110-116. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.01.012

    Zou Yiwei, Dai Dan, Wang Yixin, et al. Mechanisms of organic phosphonate retarders to abnormally thicken oil well cement[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2025, 42(1): 110-116. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.01.012
    [13] 林鑫, 刘硕琼, 夏修建, 等. 环氧磷酸缓凝剂研发及抗220 ℃常规密度水泥浆综合性能[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2024, 41(2): 215-219. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.02.011

    Lin Xin, Liu Shuoqiong, Xia Xiujian, et al. Development of an epoxy phosphate retarder and a high temperature cement slurry resistant to 220 ℃[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2024, 41(2): 215-219. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.02.011
    [14] 凌勇, 于倩倩, 马如然, 等. 固井用高温缓凝剂的研究与应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2023, 40(2): 209-215.

    Ling Yong, Yu Qianqian, Ma Ruran, et al. Study and application of a high temperature retarding agent for well cementing[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2023, 40(2): 209-215.
    [15] Wu W C, Yu X R, Hu A B, et al. Amphoteric retarder for long-standing cementing: preparation, properties and working mechanism[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2023, 223: 211524. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211524
    [16] Ma L, Qiang Y J, Zhao W J. Designing novel organic inhibitor loaded MgAl-LDHs nanocontainer for enhanced corrosion resistance[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 408: 127367. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127367
    [17] Kubissa W, Jaskulski R, Grzelak M. Torrent air permeability and sorptivity of concrete made with the use of air entraining agent and citric acid as setting retardant[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 268: 121703. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121703
    [18] Pan Y N, Du J L, Chen J, et al. Interlayer intercalation of Li/Al-LDHs responsible for high-efficiency Boron extraction[J]. Desalination, 2022, 539: 115966. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2022.115966
    [19] Lin Y J, Li D Q, Evans D G, et al. Modulating effect of Mg–Al–CO3 layered double hydroxides on the thermal stability of PVC resin[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2005, 88(2): 286-293. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.11.007
    [20] Costa R, Cardoso T, Degen M, et al. Influence of retarder admixtures on the hydration, rheology, and compressive strength of white portland cements under different temperatures[J]. Cement, 2023, 11: 100057. doi: 10.1016/j.cement.2023.100057
    [21] Jagtap A, Wagle P G, Jagtiani E, et al. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) for coating applications[J]. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 2022, 19(4): 1009-1032. doi: 10.1007/s11998-022-00624-y
    [22] Shu X, Ran Q P, Liu J P, et al. Tailoring the solution conformation of polycarboxylate superplasticizer toward the improvement of dispersing performance in cement paste[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 116: 289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.127
    [23] Kumar S, Bera A, Shah S N. Potential applications of nanomaterials in oil and gas well cementing: current status, challenges and prospects[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 213: 110395. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110395
    [24] Cao L, Guo J T, Tian J H, et al. Preparation of Ca/Al-layered double hydroxide and the influence of their structure on early strength of cement[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 184: 203-214. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.186
    [25] 王萌. 水滑石及蒙脱土基超分子双电层纳米材料的制备、表征及应用研究[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2017.

    Wang Meng. Preparation, characterization, and application of supramolecular double layer nanomaterials based on hydrotalcite and montmorillonite[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2017.
    [26] 罗润泽. 水滑石/碳纳米管对水泥砂浆性能影响研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2021.

    Luo Runze. Study on the influence of hydrotalcite/carbon nanotubes on the properties of cement mortar[D]. Hengyang: University of South China, 2021.
    [27] 贾慧, 金鑫, 魏浩光, 等. 碳纳米管羧基功能化及其对水泥石的影响[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2024, 41(5): 640-645. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.05.011

    Jia Hui, Jin Xin, Wei Haoguang, et al. Carboxyl functionalized carbon nanotube and its effects on set cement[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2024, 41(5): 640-645. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.05.011
    [28] Fakoya M F, Shah S N. Emergence of nanotechnology in the oil and gas industry: emphasis on the application of silica nanoparticles[J]. Petroleum, 2017, 3(4): 391-405. doi: 10.1016/j.petlm.2017.03.001
    [29] Liu Y, Liu M Y, Li H, et al. Hydration kinetics of portland cement shifting from silicate to aluminate dominance based on multi-mineral reactions and interactions[J]. Materials & Design, 2023, 233: 112228. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112228
    [30] Li P P, Hu M M, Liu M, et al. Thixotropic and hydration effects of Mg/Al-layered double hydroxide and sodium montmorillonite composite dispersion on oil well cement paste[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 134: 104785. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104785
    [31] 张春龙, 王铎, 郝亮亮, 等. 改性纳米SiO2@AEPM聚合物耐温缓凝剂制备及性能评价[J]. 化学工程师, 2023, 37(6): 104-108, 103.

    Zhang Chunlong, Wang Duo, Hao Liangliang, et al. Preparation and performance evaluation of modified nano-SiO2@AEPM polymeric temperature-resistant retarder[J]. Chemical Engineer, 2023, 37(6): 104-108,103.
    [32] Xu S L, Chen Z R, Zhang B W, et al. Facile preparation of pure CaAl-layered double hydroxides and their application as a hardening accelerator in concrete[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 155(3): 881-885. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.08.003
    [33] Li H Y, Liu Y, Yang K, et al. Effects of synthetic CSH-tartaric acid nanocomposites on the properties of ordinary Portland cement[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 129: 104466. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104466
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(9)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  25
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-01-28
  • 修回日期:  2026-03-01
  • 刊出日期:  2026-07-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    尊敬的作者、读者:

    您好!

    为更好地服务于广大作者和读者,提升期刊编辑部的办公效率和服务质量,本刊编辑部办公地点及联系电话已进行变更。

    新办公地址:天津经济技术开发区第二大街83号中国石油天津大厦A517房间

    新联系电话:022-65278734

                         022-25275527

    我们衷心希望广大作者和读者能够继续支持我们的工作,共同推动期刊的发展和进步。

    再次感谢您对期刊的关注和支持!