留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

侏罗系井壁失稳机理分析及封堵防塌钻井液技术

付燈煌 万明庆 罗敬兵 柯琎 邹俊 王波

付燈煌,万明庆,罗敬兵,等. 侏罗系井壁失稳机理分析及封堵防塌钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2026,43(4):479-488 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.006
引用本文: 付燈煌,万明庆,罗敬兵,等. 侏罗系井壁失稳机理分析及封堵防塌钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2026,43(4):479-488 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.006
Fu Denghuang, Wan Mingqing, Luo Jingbing, et al.Analysis on wellbore instability mechanism of jurassic formation and plugging anti-collapse drilling fluid technology[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(4):479-488 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.006
Citation: Fu Denghuang, Wan Mingqing, Luo Jingbing, et al.Analysis on wellbore instability mechanism of jurassic formation and plugging anti-collapse drilling fluid technology[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(4):479-488 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.006

侏罗系井壁失稳机理分析及封堵防塌钻井液技术

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.04.006
详细信息
    作者简介:

    付燈煌,1999年生,助理工程师,2024年毕业于西南石油大学石油与天然气工程,现在从事钻井工艺技术研究工作。电话13908293418;E-mail:2993110870@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: TE254.3

Analysis on Wellbore Instability Mechanism of Jurassic Formation and Plugging Anti-collapse Drilling Fluid Technology

  • 摘要: 潜探1井是位于柴达木盆地牛东构造的一口风险探井,在钻井过程中侏罗系地层出现井壁失稳问题,严重制约了钻井施工进度。为了解决该问题,综合运用岩心观察、扫描电镜、X射线衍射、岩石力学测试、数值模拟及现场试验等方法,系统开展了地质特征表征、失稳机理分析、封堵防塌钻井液研发及现场应用研究。结果表明:侏罗系地层井壁失稳以“高陡裂缝力学滑动+硬脆性岩石剥落”为主导机理,钻井液热稳定性差、对裂缝封堵不彻底、抑制性不足对裂缝封堵不彻底、抑制性不足是诱发井壁失稳的关键因素;基于失稳机理,研发出“抗温-封堵-抑制”协同型钻井液体系,通过优选抗温材料、复配多层级封堵剂、强化抑制体系,实现180 ℃高温高压下滤失量≤12 mL、泥饼厚度≤2 mm,岩样滚动回收率≥98%的优异性能;现场应用结果显示,该钻井液体系使潜探1井五开井段井壁垮塌发生率降低80%,机械钻速提升52%,井径扩大率控制在8%以内,显著提升了钻井施工效率与井筒质量。研究建立的高陡裂缝硬脆性地层失稳判据与防控技术,为同类复杂地层的安全高效钻井提供了重要理论依据与工程范例,具有重要现场指导价值。

     

  • 图  1  潜探4988~4991 m段不同岩性电镜扫描情况

    图  2  泥岩掉块在蒸馏水和钻井液中的膨胀率

    图  3  湖西山组成像测井结果数据统计

    图  4  地层倾角0°时潜探1井应力状态

    图  5  地层倾角30°时潜探1井应力状态

    图  6  地层倾角70°时潜探1井应力状态

    图  7  潜探1井五开钻时分布图

    表  1  潜探1井五开井浆性能检测表

    实验
    条件
    FL/mL 泥饼/mm φ600/φ300/φ200/φ100/φ6/φ3
    API HTHP API HTHP
    条件一 0.6 4.2 0.5 1.5 / /245/147/24/17
    条件二 0.5 25.0 0.5 5.0 201/119/87/52/8/6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  潜探1井五开井浆调整实验降滤失性能、泥饼厚度及流变性能

    配方 ρ/(g·cm−3 FLAPI/mL 泥饼API/mm FLHTHP/mL 泥饼HTHP/mm φ600/φ300/φ200/φ100/φ6/φ3 高温高压泥饼描述
    1# 1.85 0.3 0.5 8.4 4 282/164/119/70/10/8 虚、厚、脆
    2# 1.85 0.3 0.5 6.2 2 270/156/114/67/10/7 薄、韧、脆
    3# 1.85 0.1 0.5 8.4 4 262/151/110/64/8/6 虚、厚、脆
    4# 1.85 0.1 0.5 8.0 4 306/189/145/84/13/9 虚、厚、脆
    5# 1.85 0.1 0.5 7.0 2 271/161/119/70/10/8 薄、滑、韧
    6# 1.85 0.3 0.5 23.0 5 202/119/87/51/8/6 厚、不致密
    7# 1.85 0.3 0.5 23.0 5 201/119/88/53/9/7 厚、脆
    8# 1.85 1.6 0.5 43.0 10 205/124/93/58/22/8 硬、厚
    9# 1.85 2.0 0.5 19.0 4 292/173/127/75/12/9 厚、脆
    10# 1.85 3.4 0.5 78.0 16 109/62/45/27/5/4 硬、厚
    11# 1.85 0.6 0.5 10.0 2 273/162/119/70/10/8 薄、滑、韧
    12# 1.85 4.4 0.5 80.0 17 97/56/41/24/5/4 硬、厚
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 周军, 边会媛, 陈文安, 等. 牛东地区砂砾岩储层测井层内非均质性评价[J]. 物探与化探, 2024, 48(1): 142-150.

    Zhou Jun, Bian Huiyuan, Chen Wenan, et al. Log-based evaluation of intralayer heterogeneity of glutenite reservoirs in the Niudong area[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2024, 48(1): 142-150.
    [2] 马明, 范桥辉. 常规天然气伴生氦气成藏条件—以柴达木盆地北缘地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(4): 587-600.

    Ma Ming, Fan Qiaohui. Accumulation conditions of helium in natural conventional gas reservoirs: case study of the northern margin of Qaidam Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(4): 587-600.
    [3] 龚良钢. 牛东砂砾岩储层测井评价研究[D]. 抚州: 东华理工大学, 2021.

    Gong Lianggang. Study on logging evaluation of Niudong glutenite reservoir[D]. Fuzhou: East China University of Technology, 2021.
    [4] 边会媛, 韩博华, 王飞, 等. 柴北缘牛东地区砂砾岩储层特征及分类评价[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2020, 40(5): 894-901. doi: 10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2020.0519

    Bian Huiyuan, Han Bohua, WanG Fei, et al. Characteristics and classification of glutenite reservoirs in Niudong area, North margin of Qaidam basin[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2020, 40(5): 894-901. doi: 10.13800/j.cnki.xakjdxxb.2020.0519
    [5] 金俊超, 景来红, 杨风威, 等. 基于Mohr-Coulomb准则的岩石弹塑性损伤模型应力更新算法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2025, 42(5): 9-20. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.01.0016

    Jin Junchao, Jing Laihong, Yang Fengwei, et al. A numerical algorithm of elastoplastic damage constitutive model of rock based on Mohr-Coulomb criterion[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2025, 42(5): 9-20. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.01.0016
    [6] 曹艺辉, 李铀. Mohr-Coulomb准则的试验验证与修正[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 51(2): 399-410. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2020.02.014

    Cao Yihui, LI You. Test verification and modification of Mohr-Coulomb criterion[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2020, 51(2): 399-410. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2020.02.014
    [7] 周靖人, 魏炯, 王青元, 等. 基于修正莫尔-库仑准则的围岩瞬态卸荷塑性变形分析[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 38(2): 275-279. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3026.2017.02.025

    Zhou Jingren, Wei Jiong, Wang Qingyuan, et al. Research on transient unloading-induced plastic Zone in surrounding rock based on modified Mohr-Coulomb criterion[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2017, 38(2): 275-279. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3026.2017.02.025
    [8] Ebneali Heydari K, Baghbanan A, Hashemolhosseini H, et al. Drilling-based rock strength estimation: a validated model for Mohr-Coulomb and a new theoretical-empirical approach for Hoek-Brown parameters[J]. Results in Engineering, 2025, 28: 107388. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107388
    [9] 刘锋报, 孙金声, 尹达, 等. 塔里木万米科探井垮塌机理研究及技术对策[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2024, 41(6): 709-718.

    Liu Fengbao, Sun Jinsheng, Yin Da, et al. Mechanisms of and technical measures for solving borehole wall instability in ten-thousand-meter scientific exploration wells in Tarim basin[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2024, 41(6): 709-718.
    [10] 刘向君, 罗平亚. 岩石力学与石油工程[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004.

    Liu Xiangjun, Luo Pingya. Rock mechanics and petroleum engineering[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2004.
    [11] 高书阳, 薄克浩, 张亚云, 等. 川东北陆相页岩储层井壁失稳机理研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2025, 42(2): 217-224.

    Gao Shuyang, Bo Kehao, Zhang Yayun, et al. Study on wellbore instability mechanism of continental shale reservoir in northeastern Sichuan basin[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2025, 42(2): 217-224.
    [12] 刘向君, 罗平亚. 石油测井与井壁稳定[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1999.

    Liu Xiangjun, Luo Pingya. Petroleum well logging and borehole wall stability[M]. Beijing: Petroleum industry press, 1999.
    [13] 吕坤鸿, 张辉, 田得粮, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地深部煤层井壁失稳机理及钻井液对策[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2024, 41(5): 564-573.

    Lyu Kunhong, Zhang Hui, Tian Deliang, et al. Mechanisms of borehole wall instability of deep coal seam in Ordos basin and drilling fluid countermeasures[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2024, 41(5): 564-573.
    [14] 高世峰, 屈沅治, 都伟超, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区泥岩段多场耦合井壁失稳机理[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2025, 42(5): 600-608 .

    Gao Shifeng, Qu Yuanzhi, Du Weichao, et al.Mechanism of multi-field coupled wellbore instability in the mudstone section of the southern margin of the Junggar basin[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2025, 42(5): 600-608.
    [15] 赵国晨, 温云杰, 王娟娟, 等. 基于Drucker-Prager屈服准则的岩石损伤断裂分析[J]. 陕西煤炭, 2025, 44(1): 69-73. doi: 10.20120/j.cnki.issn.1671-749x.2025.0114

    Zhao Guochen, Wen Yunjie, Wang Juanjuan, et al. Analysis of rock damage fracture based on Drucker-Prager yield criterion[J]. Shaanxi Meitan, 2025, 44(1): 69-73. doi: 10.20120/j.cnki.issn.1671-749x.2025.0114
    [16] Kabwe E. Confining stress effect on the elastoplastic ground reaction considering the lode angle dependence[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2020, 30(03): 431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.04.002
    [17] 庄妍, 王康宇. 基于Von-Mises屈服准则的结构安定性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(增刊1): 170-174, 191. doi: 10.20174/j.juse.2016.s1.028

    Zhuang Yan, Wang Kangyu. Shakedown analysis of structures obeying Von-Mises criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(S1): 170-174,191. doi: 10.20174/j.juse.2016.s1.028
    [18] 耿立军, 刘峰, 冮鹏, 等. 渤海盆地锦州25-1区块中部泥岩地层井壁失稳机理及钻井液对策[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2025, 42(1): 58-65.

    Geng Lijun, Liu Feng, Gang peng, et al. Mechanisms of borehole wall destabilization in drilling shale formations in thecentral part of block Jinzhou-25-1 in Bohai basin and drilling fluid countermeasures[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2025, 42(1): 58-65.
    [19] Al-Ajmi A M, Zimmerman R W. The mogi-coulomb true-triaxial failure criterion and some implications for rock engineering[C]//the 11th ISRM Congress. Lisbon, Portugal: ISRM, 2007: ISRM-11CONGRESS-2007-107.
    [20] Singh A, Rao K S, Ayothiraman R, et al. An analytical solution to wellbore stability using Mogi-Coulomb failure criterion[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 11(6): 1211-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.03.004
    [21] 史亚红, 夏宏泉, 彭梦, 等. 一种准确预测钻井液安全密度窗口的新方法[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26(2): 248-252.

    Shi Yahong, Xia Hongquan, Peng Meng, et al. New accurate prediction method of safe window of drilling fluid density[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2019, 26(2): 248-252.
    [22] 马勇, 冉航, 汪洋松, 等. 川南茅口组碳酸盐岩井壁裂缝摩擦特性与结构失稳模拟研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2026, 43(1): 9-17.

    Ma Yong, Ran Hang, Wang Yangsong, et al.Simulation research on friction characteristics of borehole wall fracture surfaces and structural instability in maokou carbonate formation in southern Sichuan[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2026, 43(1): 9-17.
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-01-16
  • 修回日期:  2026-04-23
  • 刊出日期:  2026-07-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    尊敬的作者、读者:

    您好!

    为更好地服务于广大作者和读者,提升期刊编辑部的办公效率和服务质量,本刊编辑部办公地点及联系电话已进行变更。

    新办公地址:天津经济技术开发区第二大街83号中国石油天津大厦A517房间

    新联系电话:022-65278734

                         022-25275527

    我们衷心希望广大作者和读者能够继续支持我们的工作,共同推动期刊的发展和进步。

    再次感谢您对期刊的关注和支持!