留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

甲酸钾完井液储层损害评价中的盐结晶特性研究

徐安国 张新宇 张宇飞 孙昊 赵欣

徐安国,张新宇,张宇飞,等. 甲酸钾完井液储层损害评价中的盐结晶特性研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2026,43(3):427-434 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.017
引用本文: 徐安国,张新宇,张宇飞,等. 甲酸钾完井液储层损害评价中的盐结晶特性研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2026,43(3):427-434 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.017
XU Anguo, ZHANG Xinyu, ZHANG Yufei, et al.Study on salt crystallization characteristics in evaluating reservoir damage by potassium formate completion fluids[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(3):427-434 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.017
Citation: XU Anguo, ZHANG Xinyu, ZHANG Yufei, et al.Study on salt crystallization characteristics in evaluating reservoir damage by potassium formate completion fluids[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(3):427-434 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.017

甲酸钾完井液储层损害评价中的盐结晶特性研究

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.017
基金项目: 新型油气勘探开发国家科技重大专项“深水安全高效钻完井关键工程技术及装备”(2025ZD1403200)。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    徐安国,高级工程师,主要从事钻井液与完井液研究工作。电话 13821094527;E-mail:xuang@cosl.com.cn

    通讯作者:

    赵欣,博士,教授,主要从事钻井液与完井液研究工作。E-mail:zhaoxin@upc.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TE258

Study on Salt Crystallization Characteristics in Evaluating Reservoir Damage by Potassium Formate Completion Fluids

  • 摘要: 针对常规岩心流动实验无法准确反映高密度无固相盐水完井液在井下作业条件中的盐结晶特征的问题,提出一种融合气体驱替岩心实验与动态可视化分析的评价实验方法,通过氮气驱替模拟实际返排环境,结合显微可视化技术原位观测盐析行为,探究了温度(80~120 ℃)、压力骤变(3.5 MPa→常压)及气体返排对盐结晶的影响,优化出适合分析甲酸钾完井液在储层环境下结晶特性的实验方法。实验结果表明:温度压力骤变是甲酸钾完井液发生盐析出损害的主要原因,其中气体返排引发的闪蒸效应是盐析出的核心诱因,120 ℃下析盐量可达8~9 g/L;温度、压力单一条件变化时岩心渗透率恢复值约为65%,降温降压同时作用进一步加剧损害,渗透率恢复值降至62.33%;多孔介质盐析出损害机制主要为晶体在孔喉狭窄处架桥生长以及在孔隙壁面堆积。优化实验方法后,维持恒温恒压条件(120 ℃,1 MPa)可抑制盐析,渗透率恢复值提升至75.37%,较非稳态条件提高10%~21%。优化的研究方法为准确评价井下盐析损害特征及优化完井液提供了理论和方法指导。

     

  • 图  1  钻完井液驱替污染可视化实验设备

    图  2  岩心污染及气体返排实验流程

    图  3  不同温度压力下甲酸钾在水中的溶解度变化

    图  4  120 ℃、3.5 MPa下恒压降温前后石英砂多孔介质显微观察照片

    图  5  不同温度下驱替浸泡2 h降温前后甲酸钾溶液的密度变化率

    图  6  120 ℃、3.5 MPa下恒温降压前后石英砂多孔介质显微观察照片

    图  7  不同温度下驱替浸泡2 h降压前后甲酸钾溶液的密度变化率

    图  8  120 ℃/3.5 MPa条件下气体反排前后石英砂多孔介质显微观察照片

    图  9  不同温度下驱替浸泡2 h气体返排前后甲酸钾溶液的密度变化率

    表  1  甲酸钾在不同温度水中的溶解度(常压下)[21]

    T/ ℃ 溶解度/(g/100 g水) 质量百分比/%
    0 5 75.0
    20 337 77.1
    25 347 77.6
    40 400 80.0
    60 510 83.6
    80 20 85.7
    100 700 87.5
    120 850 89.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  污染前后岩心的渗透率及其恢复值

    实验条件K0/mDK1/mDK1/K0/%
    恒温降压114.3278.6368.78
    恒压降温118.3976.3064.45
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] KHAN R A, TARIQ Z, MURTAZA M, et al. Ionic liquids as completion fluids to mitigate formation damage[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 214: 110564. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110564
    [2] WANG X C, LIU H, WANG C, et al. Big data method for evaluating reservoir damage degree of fuzzy ball drilling fluid[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 605-612.
    [3] 谢仁军, 吴怡, 袁俊亮, 等. 南海超高温高压气田开发钻完井技术可行性评估与关键技术研究[J]. 中国海上油气, 2021, 33(5): 122-129 doi: 10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2021.05.015

    XIE Renjun, WU Yi, YUAN Junliang, et al. Technical feasibility evaluation and key technologies study of drilling and completion for development of UHTHP gas fields in South China Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2021, 33(5): 122-129. doi: 10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2021.05.015
    [4] ZHAO X, ZHANG H, WANG S, et al. Characterization and performance evaluation of modified apatite ore as a new Acid-Soluble weighting agent for drilling fluids[J]. SPE Journal, 2024, 29(1): 55-63. doi: 10.2118/217473-PA
    [5] WANG J, SUN J S, HUANG X B, et al. A salt-responsive amphoteric viscosifier for high-density solid-free completion fluids with high temperature resistance, strong solubility, and high viscosity enhancement[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, 243: 213303. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213303
    [6] JINHUA H, XING Z, YUANJUN C, et al. Preparation, characterization and application of environment-friendly high density and low damage solid free completion fluids for completing HTHP oil and gas wells[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2023, 221: 211351. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2022.211351
    [7] XU L, XU M B, WEI Y S, et al. An autonomously self-gel-breaking, highly reservoir protective completion fluid tailored for gel-free processing in multi-lateral well construction[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 211: 110136. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110136
    [8] 陈娟, 刘友权, 向超, 等. 高密度甲酸钾完井液在酸液中的析出机理及配方优化[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2023, 52(5): 74-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2023.05.010

    CHEN Juan, LIU Youquan, XIANG Chao, et al. Precipitation mechanism and formulation optimization of high-density Potassium formate completion fluid in acid solution[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2023, 52(5): 74-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2023.05.010
    [9] SINGH R, SHARMA R, RAO G R. A deep sea completion fluid technology- novel high density brine- based completion fluid for applications in high pressure and high temperature petroleum reservoirs[C]//OCEANS 2022 - Chennai. Chennai, India: IEEE, 2022: 1-5.
    [10] JIA H, NIU C C, HU Y X. The potential study of ultra-high density heteropolysate solid free brine as well completion fluid for deep reservoir development[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 84: 103638. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103638
    [11] ZHANG L S, YANG Q C, JIANG M G, et al. A new salt-precipitation-based self-remediation model for CO2 leakage along fault during geological CO2 storage[J]. Energy, 2024, 305: 132286. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132286
    [12] YANG J Y, LEI T M, WANG G, et al. Lattice boltzmann modelling of salt precipitation during brine evaporation[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2023, 180: 104542. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104542
    [13] HE Y W, QIAO Y, XIE Y X, et al. Evaluation of underground gas storage capacity in the depleted gas reservoir with water evaporation and salt precipitation[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, 238: 212895. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.212895
    [14] JIANG G C, SUN J S, HE Y B, et al. Novel Water-Based drilling and completion fluid technology to improve wellbore quality during drilling and protect unconventional reservoirs[J]. Engineering, 2022, 18: 129-142. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.11.014
    [15] 孙文化, 卢爱婷. 一种基于长效储层保护的新型有机胺完井液[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 81-88. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.11.11.01

    SUN Wenhua, LU Aiting. A new organic amine completion fluid for long-term reservoir protection[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science& Technology Edition), 2023, 45(3): 81-88. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.11.11.01
    [16] SUN J S, XU C Y, KANG Y L, et al. Formation damage mechanism and control strategy of the compound function of drilling fluid and fracturing fluid in shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(2): 430-439. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(24)60034-0
    [17] ZHAO X, QIU Z S, SUN B J, et al. Formation damage mechanisms associated with drilling and completion fluids for deepwater reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 173: 112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.098
    [18] 赵欣, 苏文治, 单锴, 等. 基于压力衰减法的低渗透储层高温敏感性评价实验[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(3): 164-171.

    ZHAO Xin, SU Wenzhi, SHAN Kai, et al. High-temperature sensitivity evaluation of low-permeability reservoir formations based on pressure pulse decay method[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(3): 164-171.
    [19] 邓建明, 马英文. 渤海中深层天然气田钻完井关键技术现状及展望[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(6): 677-683. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2018.06.001

    DENG Jianming, MA Yingwen. Status and prospect of key drilling and completion technologies used in middle-deep natural gas fields of the Bohai Sea[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 40(6): 677-683. doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2018.06.001
    [20] 解习农, 叶茂松, 徐长贵, 等. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷混积岩优质储层特征及成因机理[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(10): 3526-3539.

    XIE Xinong, YE Maosong, XU Changgui, et al. High quality reservoirs characteristics and forming mechanisms of mixed Siliciclastic-Carbonate sediments in the Bozhong sag, Bohai bay basin[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(10): 3526-3539.
    [21] AYYAGARI V, HWANG Y, KIM J. Design and development of Potassium formate based atmospheric water harvester[J]. Energy, 2021, 221: 119726. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119726
    [22] 袁学芳, 汤勇, 刘举, 等. 克深气藏加重压裂液返排密度降低原因研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2017, 40(4): 101-102,105.

    YUAN Xuefang, TANG Yong, LIU Ju, et al. Study on causes of backflow liquid density decrease when weighted Frac fluid used at keshed gas reservoir[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2017, 40(4): 101-102,105.
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  10
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-05
  • 修回日期:  2026-02-13
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-06-12
  • 刊出日期:  2026-06-12

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    尊敬的作者、读者:

    您好!

    为更好地服务于广大作者和读者,提升期刊编辑部的办公效率和服务质量,本刊编辑部办公地点及联系电话已进行变更。

    新办公地址:天津经济技术开发区第二大街83号中国石油天津大厦A517房间

    新联系电话:022-65278734

                         022-25275527

    我们衷心希望广大作者和读者能够继续支持我们的工作,共同推动期刊的发展和进步。

    再次感谢您对期刊的关注和支持!