留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

固井水泥浆传压效率与其静液柱压力变化规律

李成全 刘波 余兆才 邓天安 李尚东 张春梅 程小伟

李成全,刘波,余兆才,等. 固井水泥浆传压效率与其静液柱压力变化规律[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2026,43(3):402-409 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.014
引用本文: 李成全,刘波,余兆才,等. 固井水泥浆传压效率与其静液柱压力变化规律[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2026,43(3):402-409 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.014
LI Chengquan, LIU Bo, YU Zhaocai, et al.Pressure transmission efficiency and changing pattern of hydrostatic pressure of cement slurries[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(3):402-409 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.014
Citation: LI Chengquan, LIU Bo, YU Zhaocai, et al.Pressure transmission efficiency and changing pattern of hydrostatic pressure of cement slurries[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2026, 43(3):402-409 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.014

固井水泥浆传压效率与其静液柱压力变化规律

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2026.03.014
基金项目: 油气重大专项“四川盆地深层超深层碳酸盐岩气藏勘探开发技术与集成示范”(编号:2025ZD1402500)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李成全,高级工程师,1978年生,2019年毕业于西南石油大学,现在从事钻井工程方面的工作。电话 (028)86012494;E-mail:lichengq@petrochina.com.cn。

    通讯作者:

    程小伟,教授,博士生导师。长期从事固井材料与固井工程研究工作。E-mail:chengxw@swpu.edu.cn。

  • 中图分类号: TE256

Pressure Transmission Efficiency and Changing Pattern of Hydrostatic Pressure of Cement Slurries

  • 摘要: 固井水泥浆静液柱压力下降被认为是造成早期环空气窜的主要诱因之一,而环空气窜是阻碍油气井正常开采的关键原因,然而当前研究对于加压条件下的静液柱压力变化规律研究较少。因此利用自研仪器开展了固井水泥浆在间隔30 min在4.5 MPa下持续憋压5 min的分段憋压条件下的静液柱压力实验,同时针对现场油气井难以完成静液柱压力测试实验的现状,完成了现场水泥浆体系不同温度下的静液柱压力和静胶凝强度实验,并结合测井结果,针对浆体性能进行了改进。结果表明,候凝过程中水泥浆体的传压效率与静液柱压力变化规律类似,均为先保持平稳,至快速失重点后快速下降,完全失重后,传压效率降为0。在中高温情况下,现场水泥浆静液柱压力与静胶凝强度的差异较小,可利用静胶凝强度来参考失重时间。低温条件下出现了水泥浆失重时间随温度升高而降低的现象,对照测井结果显示,先失重的浆柱的传压效率降低至0,井口憋压数值无法有效传递至下部,使得固井质量降低。通过调整配方,延长缓凝水泥浆体系的失重时间,成功提高了固井质量。

     

  • 图  1  水泥浆静液柱压力测试装置图

    图  2  憋压状态下水泥浆静液柱压力变化曲线

    图  3  水泥浆传压效率与静液柱压力随时间的变化曲线

    图  4  A水泥浆体系75~90 ℃静液柱压力实验结果

    图  5  A水泥浆体系95~140 ℃静液柱压力实验结果

    图  6  A水泥浆体系快速失重时间点与静胶凝强度时间点

    图  7  A水泥浆体系静液柱压力拟合结果

    图  8  应用A水泥浆体系天然气井的测井结果

    图  9  调整配方后的水泥浆静液柱压力实验结果

    表  1  水泥浆柱静液柱压力与传压效率

    时间段
    $ {t}_{n} $
    时间段/
    min
    憋压
    $ {p}_{0} $/
    MPa
    静液柱压力/MPa $\varPhi \left({t}_{n}\right) $/
    %
    最小值$ {p}_{1}\left({t}_{n}\right) $ 平均值$ {p}_{2}\left({t}_{n}\right) $
    1 45~50 4.5 0.338 4.549 93.57
    2 80~85 4.5 0.359 4.297 87.51
    3 105~110 4.5 0.348 4.401 90.06
    4 145~150 4.5 0.342 4.303 88.02
    5 185~190 4.5 0.388 4.240 85.60
    6 225~230 4.5 0.362 3.565 71.17
    7 280~285 4.5 0.398 2.839 54.24
    8 305~310 4.5 0.326 1.645 29.31
    9 350~355 4.5 0 0 0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  A水泥浆体系75~140 ℃的快速失重时间点

    T/℃ 水泥浆 快速失重时间点/h 静胶凝强度时间点/h
    75 缓凝 13.50 23.50
    80 缓凝 17.01 21.25
    85 缓凝 16.08 20.80
    90 缓凝 19.63 17.66
    95 缓凝 19.23 14.01
    100 缓凝 14.71 14.17
    105 缓凝 12.65 12.51
    110 快干 6.66 6.51
    120 快干 5.55 4.08
    130 快干 4.25 3.17
    140 快干 3.00 3.08
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] LIU K Q, CHENG X W, GAO X S, et al. Effect of the hydration rate and microstructure of Portland cement slurry on hydrostatic pressure transfer[J]. Powder Technology, 2019, 352: 251-261. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.04.066
    [2] 刘洋, 陈敏, 史芳芳, 等. 水泥浆失重压力评价技术研究与应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(6): 749-753.

    LIU Yang, CHEN Min, SHI Fangfang, et al. Study and application of a technology for evaluating pressure loss of cement plug[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(6): 749-753.
    [3] 张波, 管志川, 张琦, 等. 高压气井环空压力预测与控制措施[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(4): 518-522. doi: 10.11698/PED.2015.04.15

    ZHANG Bo, GUAN Zhichuan, ZHANG Qi, et al. Prediction of sustained annular pressure and the pressure control measures for high pressure gas wells[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(4): 518-522. doi: 10.11698/PED.2015.04.15
    [4] 郭建华, 郑有成, 李维, 等. 窄压力窗口井段精细控压压力平衡法固井设计方法与应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(11): 86-91. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.11.011

    GUO Jianhua, ZHENG Youcheng, LI Wei, et al. Design and application of well cementing technology based on the precise managed pressure balancing method in narrow pressure window hole sections[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(11): 86-91. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.11.011
    [5] LIU K Q, YANG Y, ZHANG X N, et al. Time-varying characteristics and mechanisms of hydrostatic pressure descent of Portland cement slurry[J]. Powder Technology, 2021, 385: 434-443. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.03.016
    [6] 张更, 李军, 柳贡慧, 等. 海上高温高压井环空ECD精细预测模型[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2021, 38(6): 698-704. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2021.06.006

    ZHANG Geng, LI Jun, LIU Gonghui, et al. A precise model for prediction of annular ECD in offshore HTHP wells[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2021, 38(6): 698-704. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2021.06.006
    [7] 李早元, 李进, 郭小阳, 等. 固井早期气窜预测新方法及其应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(10): 75-82. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.10.011

    LI Zaoyuan, LI Jin, GUO Xiaoyang, et al. A new method of predicting gas channeling at the early stage of cementing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(10): 75-82. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.10.011
    [8] 刘开强, 郑友志, 冯予淇, 等. 深井固井水泥浆凝固阶段的传压效率时变规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(8): 125-132.

    LIU Kaiqiang, ZHENG Youzhi, FENG Yuqi, et al. Change laws of pressure transferring efficiency over time in the setting stage of cement slurry in deep wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(8): 125-132.
    [9] LIU K Q, YU J J, XIA Y, et al. Quantitative determination of the hydrostatic pressure of oil-well cement slurry using its hydration kinetics[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 340: 127704. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127704
    [10] LIU K Q, CHENG X W, ZHANG X G, et al. Relationship between the microstructure/pore structure of oil-well cement and hydrostatic pressure[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2018, 124(2): 463-478. doi: 10.1007/s11242-018-1078-2
    [11] 周焱, 蒋宇, 罗健侨, 等. 固井环空逐级憋压候凝方法研究与应用[J]. 石油工业技术监督, 2022, 38(10): 45-50. doi: 10.20029/j.issn.1004-1346.2022.10.010

    ZHOU Yan, JIANG Yu, LUO Jianqiao, et al. Research and application of step-by-step pressure-holding solidifying in cementing annulus[J]. Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry, 2022, 38(10): 45-50. doi: 10.20029/j.issn.1004-1346.2022.10.010
    [12] 唐凯, 潘宇强, 沈明华. 防水窜水泥浆体系的研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(2): 27-34. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2023.02.05

    TANG Kai, PAN Yuqiang, SHEN Minghua. Application of anti-channeling cement slurry in block TAMBOCOCHA in ecuador[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(2): 27-34. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2023.02.05
    [13] 宋鹤, 杨威, 唐俊峰, 等. 耐高温高压超高密度水泥浆体系的室内研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2021, 38(1): 116-121.

    SONG He, YANG Wei, TANG Junfeng, et al. Laboratory study on an HTHP ultra-high density cement slurry[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2021, 38(1): 116-121.
    [14] 刘华俊. 浅析水泥浆静胶凝强度的测量方法[J]. 石化技术, 2015, 22(8): 101-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0235.2015.08.074

    LIU Huajun. Discussion on determination method of cement paste gelling strength[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2015, 22(8): 101-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0235.2015.08.074
    [15] ZHANG J J, LI G X, YE W T, et al. Effects of ordinary Portland cement on the early properties and hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate cement[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 186: 1144-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.008
    [16] 焦利宾, 汪瑶, 代锋, 等. 页岩气井固井分级式环空憋压技术研究与应用[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2024, 17(3): 253-258. doi: 10.16181/j.cnki.fzyqc.2024.03.001

    JIAO Libin, WANG Yao, DAI Feng, et al. Research and application of staged annular back-pressure technology for shale gas well cementing[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2024, 17(3): 253-258. doi: 10.16181/j.cnki.fzyqc.2024.03.001
    [17] 符豪, 李成全, 何彦兵, 等. “分段逐级憋压”固井工艺技术研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(2): 35-40. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2023.02.06

    FU Hao, LI Chengquan, HE Yanbing, et al. Research and application of cementing technology of "staging and staging pressurization"[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(2): 35-40. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2023.02.06
    [18] 白静静, 王敏, 史才军, 等. 降粘性聚羧酸减水剂的设计合成及在低水胶比水泥-硅灰体系中的作用[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(6): 172-179. doi: 10.11896/cldb.19040139

    BAI Jingjing, WANG Min, SHI Caijun, et al. Design, synthesis of viscosity-reducing polycarboxylate superplasticizer and its influence on cement-silica fume paste with low water-binder ratio[J]. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(6): 172-179. doi: 10.11896/cldb.19040139
    [19] 刘洋, 陈敏, 吴朗, 等. 四川盆地窄密度窗口超深井控压固井工艺[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2020, 37(2): 214-220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.02.014

    LIU Yang, CHEN Min, WU Lang, et al. Managed pressure well cementing techniques for wells with narrow safe drilling Windows in Sichuan basin[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(2): 214-220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.02.014
    [20] YANG R H, HE T S. Influence of liquid accelerators combined with mineral admixtures on early hydration of cement pastes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 295: 123659. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123659
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-05
  • 修回日期:  2026-01-27
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-06-12
  • 刊出日期:  2026-06-12

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    尊敬的作者、读者:

    您好!

    为更好地服务于广大作者和读者,提升期刊编辑部的办公效率和服务质量,本刊编辑部办公地点及联系电话已进行变更。

    新办公地址:天津经济技术开发区第二大街83号中国石油天津大厦A517房间

    新联系电话:022-65278734

                         022-25275527

    我们衷心希望广大作者和读者能够继续支持我们的工作,共同推动期刊的发展和进步。

    再次感谢您对期刊的关注和支持!