留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一种单步解除有机沉积及无机垢的单相酸体系

崔波 荣新明 冯浦涌 姚二冬 周福建 王顺

崔波,荣新明,冯浦涌,等. 一种单步解除有机沉积及无机垢的单相酸体系[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2025,42(1):134-142 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.01.015
引用本文: 崔波,荣新明,冯浦涌,等. 一种单步解除有机沉积及无机垢的单相酸体系[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2025,42(1):134-142 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.01.015
CUI Bo, RONG Xinming, FENG Puyong, et al.A single phase acid for one step removal of organic deposition and inorganic scale[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2025, 42(1):134-142 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.01.015
Citation: CUI Bo, RONG Xinming, FENG Puyong, et al.A single phase acid for one step removal of organic deposition and inorganic scale[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2025, 42(1):134-142 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.01.015

一种单步解除有机沉积及无机垢的单相酸体系

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.01.015
基金项目: 国家科技重大专项“中亚和中东地区复杂碳酸盐岩油气藏采油采气关键技术研究与应用”(2017ZX05030005);国家重大科技专项“超深裂缝性气藏井筒失稳机理及转向工艺优化研究”(2016ZX05051003)。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    崔波,硕士,高级工程师,1986年生,从事储层改造技术研究。E-mail:cuibo2@cosl.com.cn

    通讯作者:

    姚二冬,博士,高级工程师,1985年生,从事油气田开发技术研究。E-mail:yaoed@cup.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TE357.12

A Single Phase Acid for One Step Removal of Organic Deposition and Inorganic Scale

  • 摘要: 近井地带有机垢和无机垢的沉积严重影响了油气正常生产,常规解堵体系无法同时解除有机、无机及其混合垢。针对上述问题,开发了一种新型多功能解堵体系—单相酸体系,该体系由2种不相溶的液体(溶有机垢的芳烃溶剂和溶无机垢的酸液)、表面活性剂、助表面活性剂及功能型添加剂组成。采用电导率仪、粒度分析仪、旋转岩盘仪、界面张力仪、润湿角测定仪、摩阻仪、岩心流动仪、CT扫描等实验仪器对单相酸体系的性能进行了系统分析评价。实验结果表明,单相酸体系是一种外相为油、内相为酸的纳米均相分散体系,粒径分布为7~50 nm;界面张力为0;具有解除储层乳化(破乳率大于90%)、水锁、润湿改性的性能(油湿改性为水湿);可同时溶解有机垢、无机垢及其混合垢(溶解率100%),岩心伤害渗透率恢复率大于100%;具有低摩阻性能(降阻率大于80%),可实现大排量解堵作业;具有高缓速率性能(缓速率大于99%),可实现储层深部解堵。单相酸体系利用油、酸互溶原理,实现了有机垢、无机垢及其混合垢单步同时溶解,对油气井及转注井近井地带混合垢污染物的高效解除具有重要意义。单相酸体系在伊拉克米桑油田进行了现场试验,增产效果显著。

     

  • 图  1  单相酸的三相图

    图  2  单相酸粒径分布图

    图  3  不同破乳剂加量下原油破乳曲线

    图  4  单相酸对油湿碳酸岩心的润湿改性

    图  5  不同液体自吸增重曲线

    图  6  不同酸液传质系数对比图

    图  7  不同酸液体系摩阻测试

    图  8  混合垢制作流程图

    图  9  单相酸溶有机垢和无机垢过程

    图  10  砂岩混合垢伤害前后图

    图  11  混合垢伤害示意图

    图  12  砂岩混合垢伤害前后图

    图  13  砂岩解堵前后CT扫描数据及堵塞密度范围分布曲线

    图  14  B-1井为米桑油田Mishrif储层的酸化施工曲线

    表  1  不同酸液体系的界面张力

    酸液类型 残酸界面张力(25℃)/(mN·m−1)
    盐酸 31.1
    胶凝酸 30.2
    单相酸 0
    转向酸 1.8
    乳化酸 0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  溶解有机垢、无机垢及其混合垢数据

    解堵液溶解有机垢
    效率/%
    溶解无机垢
    效率/%
    溶解混合垢
    效率/%
    单相酸100100100.00
    盐酸010056.88
    芳烃溶剂100025.69
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  砂岩混合垢伤害模拟

    岩心K0/mDKd/mD伤害率/%
    2-11680.018699.99
    2-21630.003999.99
    2-31800.010299.99
    2-41770.008299.99
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  砂岩混合垢解除实验

    岩心酸液
    体系
    K0/
    mD
    Kd/
    mD
    K解除后/
    mD
    PV伤害
    解除率/%
    2-1单相酸
    (土酸)
    1680.0186258.9435154.13
    2-2单相酸
    (氟硼酸)
    1630.0039198.1875121.59
    2-3土酸1800.0102128.021571.12
    2-4芳烃溶剂1770.008290.496551.13
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 吴文明, 侯吉瑞. 新疆某油田油井堵塞物成分及成因分析[J]. 油田化学,2022,39(2):349-354.

    WU Wenming, HOU Jirui. Analysis on components and origin of the well blockage in one Xinjiang oilfield[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2022, 39(2):349-354.
    [2] 吴宝成, 熊启勇, 熊瑞颖, 等. 南缘高温高压油井堵塞成因及防治[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(6):112-119.

    WU Baocheng, XIONG Qiyong, XIONG Ruiying, et al. Cause of plugging and prevention technology of high temperature and high pressure oil well in Nanyuan[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2021, 45(6):112-119.
    [3] 刘盈, 陈安胜, 王建海, 等. 聚合物驱油藏油井堵塞机制与防治[J]. 油田化学,2022,39(3):431-437.

    LIU Ying, CHEN Ansheng, WANG Jianhai, et al. Plugging mechanism and prevention of oil well in polymer flooding reservoir[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2022, 39(3):431-437.
    [4] 李燕, 豆宁辉, 姚二冬. 哈萨克K油田油井堵塞物分析及解堵技术研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2019,36(3):391-396.

    LI Yan, DOU Ninghui, YAO Erdong. Analysis of oil well blockage in K oilfield in Kazakhstan and blockage removal techniques[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(3):391-396.
    [5] 董长银, 刘洪刚, 韩耀图, 等. 疏松砂岩稠油油藏防砂介质的原油-地层砂协同复合堵塞机制与规律[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,48(1):133-141.

    DONG Changyin, LIU Honggang, HAN Yaotu, et al. Mechanisms of crude oil-sand synergistic plugging of sand control media in heavy oil and unconsolidated sand stone reservoirs[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2024, 48(1):133-141.
    [6] 苏延辉, 王巧智, 易飞, 等. 钻井过程储层无机垢损害的时空尺度数值模拟及应用[J]. 科学技术与工程,2024,24(3):1014-1020.

    SU Yanhui, WANG Qiaozhi, YI Fei, et al. Numerical simulation and application of time-space scale of reservoir inorganic scale damage during drilling[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(3):1014-1020.
    [7] 姜维东, 罗少锋, 张伟, 等. 渤海稠油油田热化学复合吞吐增效技术研究与应用[J]. 中国海上油气,2024,36(2):141-148.

    JIANG Weidong, LUO Shaofeng, ZHANG Wei, et al. Research and application of thermochemical huff and puff efficiency increasing technology for heavy oil in Bohai heavy oilfield[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2024, 36(2):141-148.
    [8] 李善建, 何浩轩, 王泽坤, 等. 气井井筒堵塞原因分析及解堵工艺研究进展[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,39(1):56-65.

    LI Shanjian, HE Haoxuan, WANG Zekun, et al. Analysis of reasons for wellbore blockage in gas wells and research progress in blockage removal technology[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science), 2024, 39(1):56-65.
    [9] 陈林, 吕亚博, 欧家强, 等. 高磨台缘带灯影组气藏气井堵塞机理及治理对策[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2023,45(6):113-124.

    CHEN Lin, LYU Yabo, OU Jiaqiang, et al. Plugging mechanism and treatment measures of dengying formation gas reservoir in Gaoshi-Moxi platform margin belt[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2023, 45(6):113-124.
    [10] 彭志刚, 钟明镜, 冯茜, 等. W/O型微乳酸前置冲洗液的制备及其性能研究[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(2):83-89.

    PENG Zhigang, ZHONG Mingjing, FENG Qian, et al. Preparation and properties of W/O microemulsified acid preflush[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(2):83-89.
    [11] 陈明, 蓝强, 贾江鸿, 等. 有机缓释微乳酸解卡剂的制备及其性能影响因素[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2023,40(6):742-748.

    CHEN Ming, LAN Qiang, JIA Jianghong, et al. Preparation and affecting effects of a slow-releasing organic microemulsified acid pipe-freeing agent[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2023, 40(6):742-748.
    [12] 贾江鸿, 蓝强, 黄维安, 等. 有机缓释微乳酸解堵机制[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2023,45(6):690-695.

    JIA Jianghong, LAN Qiang, HUANG Weian, et al. Mechanism of organic slow-release microemulsified acid for blockage removal[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 45(6):690-695.
    [13] 王云金, 周福建, 苏航, 等. 中东碳酸盐岩储集层高效酸压用微乳酸性能评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2023,50(5):1-8.

    WANG Yunjin, ZHOU Fujian, SU Hang, et al. Performance evaluation of microemulsion acid for integrated acid fracturing in Middle Eastern carbonate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(5):1-8.
    [14] 何立成, 蓝强, 黄维安, 等. 有机缓释微乳酸高效解堵剂的制备及性能研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2022,39(2):259-264.

    HE Licheng, LAN Qiang, HUANG Weian, et al. Preparation and properties of slow-release organic acid micro-emulsion with high efficient plugging removal[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2022, 39(2):259-264.
    [15] 王超, 李海, 崔明月, 等. 高温灰岩储层新型微乳盐酸体系的构筑及性能评价[J]. 油田化学,2023,40(1):39-43,50.

    WANG Chao, LI Hai, CUI Mingyue, et al. Preparation and comprehensive evaluation of acid microemulsion for high temperature limestone reservoir[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2023, 40(1):39-43,50.
    [16] QUINTERO L, NEWBERRY M, MORALES R, et al. Organic and inorganic formation damage removal using customized formulations[C]//SPE Western Regional Meeting. Bakersfield, California: SPE, 2017: SPE-185735-MS.
    [17] QUINTERO L, FELIPE M J, MILLER K, et al. Microemulsions increase well productivity by removing organic deposits and inorganic scale in one step[C]//SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control. Lafayette, Louisiana, USA: SPE, 2018: SPE-189514-MS.
    [18] SHARMA P, KOSTARELOS K, XIONG X. Single phase microemulsions applied to oil sands[C]//SPE Western Regional Meeting. Garden Grove, California, USA: SPE, 2018: SPE-190086-MS.
    [19] 何从林, 王伯初. W/O型微乳液相行为的分析[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2020, 26(5): 52-54, 63.

    HE Conglin, WANG Bochu. Phase behavior of W/O microemulsion[J]. Journal of Chongqing University (Natural Science Edition), 2003, 26(5): 52-54, 63.
    [20] 姜桂芹, 王国勇, 胡庆贺. 氧化石墨烯纳米粒子提高乳化酸性能实验研究[J]. 应用化工, 2020, 49(12): 3008-3015.

    JIANG Guiqin, WANG Guoyong, HU Qinghe. Experimental study on improving the performance of emulsified acid by using graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(12): 3008-3010, 3015.
    [21] 蒋建方, 祁生金, 姜杰, 等. 中东孔隙型低渗灰岩储层酸液体系缓速性[J]. 科学技术与工程,2022,22(7):2669-2675.

    JIANG Jianfang, QI Shengjin, JIANG Jie, et al. Retarding property of acid system for Middle East porous type low permeability limestone reservoir[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(7):2669-2675.
  • 加载中
图(14) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  79
  • HTML全文浏览量:  27
  • PDF下载量:  26
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-09-05
  • 修回日期:  2024-10-08
  • 录用日期:  2024-10-08
  • 刊出日期:  2025-02-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回