Volume 36 Issue 3
Jun.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Yan, DOU Ninghui, YAO Erdong. Analysis of Oil Well Blockage in K Oilfield in Kazakhstan and Blockage Removal Techniques[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2019, 36(3): 391-396. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.03.022
Citation: LI Yan, DOU Ninghui, YAO Erdong. Analysis of Oil Well Blockage in K Oilfield in Kazakhstan and Blockage Removal Techniques[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2019, 36(3): 391-396. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.03.022

Analysis of Oil Well Blockage in K Oilfield in Kazakhstan and Blockage Removal Techniques

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.03.022
  • Received Date: 2019-02-05
  • Publish Date: 2019-06-30
  • Blockage of tubing and casing was found in thedown hole of K oilfield, which seriously affected the production job. The type of the blockage was identified and a high efficiency chelating blockage removing agent was developed to addressthe problem. After identifying the composition of the blockage, the reservoir characteristics of the K oilfield were first analyzed toascertain the potential reasons of well blocking. It was found that scales and the peeling iron rust by CO2 corrosion were the possiblereasons of well blocking. Then, using XRF and XRD instrument, the main components of the blockage was determined, and they are ferricoxide and small amount of rock salts. Finally, by dissolving the blockage in various acid solutions, the type of the blockage wasfurther confirmed. A blockage removing fluid, made up of an optimized chelating agent, hydrofluoric acid and a corrosion inhibitorfluid, were then developed. It was found that theblockage removing fluid works well at 120℃ and has no harm to the N80 coupon. The dissolved ratio of the blockageis 82% in 2 h.This blockage fluid cannot only protect tubing/casing strings but also dissolve the blockage, and it show excellent blockage removing abilities. After adding a corrosion inhibitor KMS-Z, its corrosion rate reduces to 8.91 g/(m2·s), which exceeding the Class 1 of corrosionindustrial standard requirement. On the other hand, although mud acid have good dissolving ability to the blockage, it is unable to control corrosion rate. Failure of corrosion protection in mud acid maybe come from the strong oxidizing ability of the ferric ions.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    赵记臣. KKM油田开发潜力综合分析[J]. 石化技术, 2016,23(5):60-62.

    ZHAO Jichen. Analysis on potential development of KKM oilfield[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2016,23(5):60-62.
    [2]
    陈慧芳. 天然气水合物形成条件的预测[J]. 西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),1994,(1):65-68. CHEN Huifang. Prediction of the conditions for the forming of natural gas hydrate[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),1994,(1):65-68.
    [3]
    康志江,黄咏梅,易斌,等. 塔河奥陶系油藏沥青质沉淀形成机理研究[J]. 特种油气藏,2008,15(6):34-37.

    KANG Zhijiang,HUANG Yongmei,YI Bin,et al. A studying on the formation mechanism of heavy hydrocarbon stemming in ordovician reservoir of Tahe oilfield[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2008,15(6):34-37.
    [4]
    丁黎. JOS凝析气藏蜡沉积实验及防蜡剂研究[D]. 西南石油大学,2015. DING Li. Wax deposition experiments in JOS condensate gas reservoir and study on wax preventers[D]. Southwest Petroleum University,2015.
    [5]
    黄海,陈博,刘易非,等. 西峰油田长8储层无机垢结垢规律及解堵措施效果[J]. 地下水,2012,34(6):198-200.

    HUANG Hai, CHEN Bo, LIU Yifei, et al. Research on scaling law and removing block effect of chang 8 layer in Xifeng Oilfield[J]. Ground Water,2012,34(6):198-200.
    [6]
    李连江,张子玉,熊敏,等. 高泥质含量疏松砂岩油层解堵防砂技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2003,(6):69-72,87

    -88. LI Lianjiang,ZHANG Ziyu,XIONG Min,et al. Plugging removing and sand control technology for reservoirs of shaly and loose sandstone[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2003,(6):69-72,87-88.
    [7]
    胡德芬,陈华勇,张艳玲,等. 气井油管堵塞原因及应对措施[J]. 钻采工艺,2007,30(6):127-129.

    HU Defen,CHEN Huayong,ZHANG Yanling,et al. Causes and countermeasures of tubing blockage in gas wells[J]. Drilling & Production Technology,2007,30(6):127-129.
    [8]
    文守成,何顺利,陈正凯,等. 气田地层结盐机理实验研究与防治措施探讨[J]. 钻采工艺,2010,33(1):86-89

    ,127-128. WEN Shoucheng,HE Shunli,CHEN Zhengkai,et al. Experimental research on the mechanism of salt precipitation and its influential factors analysis in gas field[J]. Drilling & Production Technology,2010,33(1):86-89,127-128.
    [9]
    SY 5886-2012,砂岩缓速酸性能评价方法[S]. SY 5886-2012,Evaluation method of retarded acid performance for sandstone[S].
    [10]
    SY T5405-1996,酸化用缓蚀剂性能的试验方法及评价指标[S]. SY T5405-1996,Test method and evaluation index of corrosion inhibitor performance for acidification[S].
    [11]
    张丽平,张璐兰,夕堂,等. 非酸解堵技术在渤海油田的应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2018,35(2):116-121.

    ZHANG Liping,ZHANG Lulan,LAN Xitang,et al. Application of non-acid block removing technology in Bohai oilfield[J].Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid, 2018,35(2):116-121.
    [12]
    张明,刘光泽,程飞,等.SZ36-1油田稠油储层解堵酸化技术研究[J]. 非常规油气,2017,4(2):85-90.

    ZHANG Ming,LIU Guangze,CHENG Fei,et al.The Heavy oil reservoir of SZ36-1 oilfield acidification technology research and application[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2017,4(2):85-90.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (633) PDF downloads(236) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return