Volume 34 Issue 1
Jan.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Weiguo, XU Mingbiao, YOU Fuchang. Analysis of Reservoir Protection Mechanism by Direct Drilling Fluid Flowback[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2017, 34(1): 87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.01.016
Citation: ZHANG Weiguo, XU Mingbiao, YOU Fuchang. Analysis of Reservoir Protection Mechanism by Direct Drilling Fluid Flowback[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2017, 34(1): 87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.01.016

Analysis of Reservoir Protection Mechanism by Direct Drilling Fluid Flowback

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.01.016
  • Received Date: 2016-11-03
  • Publish Date: 2017-01-31
  • Horizontal well open hole completion is a way of well completion to maximize well production rate. In offshore drilling, well completion is generally done with solids-free drill-in fluid, supplemented with gel-breaking well completion. Direct flowback of drill-in fluid is a technology developed on the basis of this way of well completion. In this paper, parameter design, additive selection and well completion technique were systematically analyzed and evaluated, and the mechanism of reservoir protection of this technology was also analyzed. The composition of the drill-in fluid is as follows:seawater+soda ash/caustic soda+rheology modifier VIS+starch filter loss reducer STARFLO+soluble salt (shale inhibition and mud weight)+high purity sized calcium carbonate MBA. The three functional additives of the formulation can all be liquefied by 0.3% HTA (a chelating agent) solution. The liquefaction of the additives left no residue and the mud cakes in the wellbore and near the borehole wall were all converted to clear saltwater. MBA is a mixture of calcium carbonate powders with five particle sizes. The particles of MBA can be "inter-inserted" with starch to form a mud cake that is much denser. Laboratory experiment has shown that the drill-in fluid had low-shear-rate viscosity of around 30,000 mPa·s, optimum contamination-resistance and flowback ability, and the highest permeability return. After contaminated with 15% drill cuttings, the drill-in fluid still had permeability return of more than 80%. This drill-in fluid was used in twelve wells in three oil fields and one gas field in the east of South China Sea. The maximum temperature at the hole bottom was 60-130℃, and the highest mud density was 1.20 g/cm3. Three of the twelve wells penetrated low porosity low permeability reservoirs and the rest nine wells penetrated reservoirs with medium to high porosity and permeability. The drilling operation was successful. The use of this technology simplified the process of well completion, saved operational time and cost, and protected the reservoirs from being damaged.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    马美娜,许明标. 一种PRD钻井液性能评价[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2006,29(2):53-55.

    MA Meina,XU Mingbiao. Property evaluation of PRD drilling fluid[J].Natural Gas Exploration & Development, 2006,29(2):53-55.
    [2]
    马美娜, 许明标, 唐海雄, 等. 有效降解PRD钻井液的低温破胶剂JPC室内研究[J]. 油田化学,2005,22(4):289-291.

    MA Meina,XU Mingbiao,TANG Haixiong, et al. Low temperature gel breaker JPC for breakdown of gelled PRD polymer drilling-in fluid in borehole bottom[J].Oilfield Chemistry, 2005,22(4):289-291.
    [3]
    程鑫桥, 舒福昌, 李蔚萍,等.一种用于PRD钻井液的缓释破胶剂[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2010, 27(1):33-35.

    CHENG Xinqiao,SHU Fuchang,LI Weiping,et al.A controlled release of gel breaker used in the PRD drilling fluid[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2010, 27(1):33-35.
    [4]
    卢淑芹, 姜薇, 陈金霞,等. 南堡潜山油气层钻井完井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2015, 32(6):18-21.

    LU Shuqin, JIANG Wei, CHEN Jinxia, et al. Drilling fluid technology for drilling Nanpu buried hill oil reservoir[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2015, 32(6):18-21.
    [5]
    韦红术,张俊斌,张伟国,等. 泥饼可液化处理的UltraFLO钻井完井液[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2015,32(4):37-39.

    WEI Hongshu, ZHANG Junbin,ZHANG Weiguo, et al.UltraFlo drill-in fluid[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2015, 32(4):37-39.
    [6]
    赵峰,唐洪明,张俊斌,等. LF13-1油田PRD钻完井液体系储层保护效果优化研究[J]. 特种油气藏,2010, 17(6):88-90.

    ZHAO Feng, TANG Hongming, et al. Optimization of reservoir protection effect of PRD drilling and completion fluid system for LF13-1 oilfield[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2010,17(6):88-90.
    [7]
    ABRAMS A. Mud design to minimize rock impairment due to particle invasion[J]. JPT, 1977, 29(3):585-592.
    [8]
    王建华,鄢捷年,郑曼,等. 理想充填暂堵钻井液室内研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2008,35(2):230-233.

    WANG Jianhua, Yan Jienian,Zheng Man, et al. Laboratory study of ideal packing approach applying to high permeability sandstones[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008,35(2):230-233.
    [9]
    邱正松, 张世锋, 黄维安, 等. "多级孔隙最优充填暂堵方法"与现场试验[J].石油钻探技术, 2012, 40(5):17-21.

    QIU Zhengsong,ZHANG Shifeng, HUANG Weian,et al. Temporary plugging and field testing with "optimum filling for multi-stage pores" method[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012,40(5):17-21.
    [10]
    魏裕森,韦红术,张俊斌,等. 碳酸钙粒径匹配对储层保护效果的影响研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2015, 12(2):51-54. WEI Yusen, WEI Hongshu, ZHANG Junbin,et al.The effect of calcium carbonate particle size matching on formation protection[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 12(2):51-54.
    [11]
    田荣剑, 罗健生, 王楠,等.钻井完井液储层损害室内评价关键技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2010, 27(6):16-19.

    TIAN Rongjian,LUO Jiansheng,WANG Nan,et al.Key technology of lab evaluation on reservoir damage of drilling and completion fluid[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2010, 27(6):16-19.
    [12]
    丰全会, 储书平, 薛芸. MTZ油田保护油气层钻井液完井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2002, 19(3):27-29.

    FENG Quanhui, CHU Shuping, XUE Yun. Drilling fluid and completion fluid technology for formation protection in MTZ oilfield[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2002, 19(3):27-29.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (755) PDF downloads(307) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return