Volume 40 Issue 1
Jan.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SUN Lin, MENG Xiangli, WU Shenqu, et al.Reservoir damage diagnosis and acidizing extended effect technology of massive sewage reinjection wells with thousands of cubic meters[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2023, 40(1):125-131 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2023.01.017
Citation: SUN Lin, MENG Xiangli, WU Shenqu, et al.Reservoir damage diagnosis and acidizing extended effect technology of massive sewage reinjection wells with thousands of cubic meters[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2023, 40(1):125-131 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2023.01.017

Reservoir Damage Diagnosis and Acidizing Extended Effect Technology of Massive Sewage Reinjection Wells with Thousands of Cubic Meters

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2023.01.017
  • Received Date: 2022-09-05
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-11-16
  • Publish Date: 2023-01-31
  • The sewage reinjection wells in Bohai C oilfield group with a daily injection volume of thousands of cubic meters which are facing the problems of sharp decline in injection volume and low efficiency of acidification. Using the integration methods of reservoir characteristics and rock physical property analysis, water quality survey and analysis, scaling prediction, software simulation, it is found that the main cause of damage of the well type is particle migration, and the damage radius is 0.3 m~0.5 m. The secondary cause of damage is scaling, solid plugging. The scaling type is calcium carbonate. The scaling amounts of the two kinds of injected water are 287.6 mg/L and 357.1 mg/L respectively. The solid plugging is mainly dolomite minerals, and the damage radius is 0.2 m. At the same time, it is analyzed that the reason for the low efficiency of acidification in the past is the use of online acidification process, which leads to the water injection volume of massive sewage reinjection well far exceeding the acid injection volume, the acid concentration dilution ratio is too large, and the acid can not effectively remove the compound damage. HLCHEM-Y acidification system was developed by using hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, fluorosilicic acid, HEDP main acid, citric acid, quaternary ammonium salt, SDBS and other additives can be used to solve problem of compound injur. The 3 m3/min~4.8 m3/min large displacement tug acid injection process is adopted to solve the problem of poor effect of low displacement acid injection process in massive sewage reinjection well under the limited space of offshore platform. The supporting technology has been applied in 16 wells of C Oilfield Group which has achieved significant results in extending the average injection rate increase from 116,000 m3 to 399,000 m3 after acidification, and the average validity period extend from 44 days to 152 days.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    易飞,徐建平,蒋官澄,等. 基于水动力不稳定性的油水乳化储层伤害数值模拟[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2017,34(6):122-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.06.023

    YI Fei, XU Jianping, JIANG Guancheng, et al. Numerical simulation of reservoir damage by oil/water emulsification based on hydrodynamic instability[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2017, 34(6):122-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.06.023
    [2]
    黄波,徐建平,蒋官澄,等. 黏土膨胀储层伤害数值模拟研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2018,35(4):126-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2018.04.023

    HUANG Bo, XU Jianping, JIANG Guancheng, et al. Numerical simulation of formation damage by clay swelling[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2018, 35(4):126-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2018.04.023
    [3]
    SY/T 0600—2009, 油田水结垢趋势预测 [S].

    SY/T 0600-2009, rediction of scaling tendency in oil-field water[S].
    [4]
    王琪,刘江红,韩露,等. 油田主要结垢机理及结垢预测模型研究进展[J]. 长春理工大学学报(自然科学版),2016,39(1):129-133+138.

    WANG Qi, LIU Jianghong, HAN Lu, et al. Research progress of the main fouling mechanism and fouling prediction model in Oilfield[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 39(1):129-133+138.
    [5]
    刘倩,彭素芹,高建瑞,等. 油田水结垢预测技术研究进展[J]. 石油管材与仪器,2020,6(3):1-5. doi: 10.19459/j.cnki.61-1500/te.2020.03.001

    LIU Qian, PENG Suqin, GAO Jianrui, et al. Progress on prediction model of Oil field water scaling[J]. Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments, 2020, 6(3):1-5. doi: 10.19459/j.cnki.61-1500/te.2020.03.001
    [6]
    ODDO J E, TOMSON M B. Why scale forms and how to predict[J]. SPE Production & Facilities, 1997, 9(1):47-54.
    [7]
    ODDO J E, TOMSON M B. Simplified calculation of CaCO3 saturation at high temperatures and pressures in brine solutions[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1982, 34(7):1583-1590. doi: 10.2118/10352-PA
    [8]
    张伟康,唐洪明,邓家胜,等. 加酸压裂油井结垢机理研究-以玛131井区为例[J]. 石化技术,2022,29(4):151-152.

    ZHANG Weikang, TANG Hongming, DENG Jiasheng, et al. Study on scaling mechanism of acid fracturing oil Wells :A case study of Mahu 131 well area[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2022, 29(4):151-152.
    [9]
    刘平礼,张璐,潘亿勇,等. 海上油田注水井单步法在线酸化技术[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(5):148-154.

    LIU Pingli, ZHANG Lu, PAN Yiyong, et al. Single step online acidizing technology for offshore water injection wells[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science& TechnologyEdition), 2014, 36(5):148-154.
    [10]
    孙林, 孟向丽, 蒋林宏, 等. 渤海油田注水井酸化低效对策研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(3): 144-147.

    SUN Lin, MENG Xiangli, JIANG Linhong, et al. Countermeasures of inefficient acidification in water injection wells of Bohai Oilfield [J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 23(3): 144-147.
    [11]
    张彩虹,杨乾隆,李发旺,等. 砂岩油藏注水井脉冲式在线注入酸化增注技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2019,36(2):261-264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.02.023

    ZHANG Caihong, YANG Qian, LI Fawang, et al. Pulsed online acidizing augmented injection to sandstone reservoirs[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(2):261-264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.02.023
    [12]
    孙林,李旭光,黄利平,等. 渤海油田注水井延效酸化技术研究与应用[J]. 石油钻探技术,2021,49(2):90-95. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2021029

    SUN Lin, LI Xuguang, HUANG Liping, et al. Research and application of prolonged-effect acidizing technology for water injection wells in the Bohai Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(2):90-95. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2021029
    [13]
    李年银,赵立强,刘平礼,等. 多氢酸酸化技术及其应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(6):131-134+216-217.

    LI Nianyin, ZHAO Liqiang, LIU pingli, et al. The acidizing technology and application of multi-hydrogen acid[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science& TechnologyEdition), 2009, 31(6):131-134+216-217.
    [14]
    高嘉珮,彭冲,牛梦龙,等. 多氢酸酸化反应特征及动力学[J]. 石油学报,2019,40(2):207-214. doi: 10.7623/syxb201902009

    GAO Jiapei, PENG Chong, LIU Menglong, et al. Acidification characteristics and kinetics of multi-hydrogen ancd[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(2):207-214. doi: 10.7623/syxb201902009
    [15]
    樊世忠. 保护油气层技术讲座 第八讲 油气层敏感性评价试验(Ⅱ)(特殊岩心分析)[J]. 钻井液与完井液,1990,7(1):32-39.

    FAN Shizhong. Workshop for technology of protecting oil and gas bearing zonge lecture(Ⅷ) reservoir sensitivity evaluation(special core analysis)[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 1990, 7(1):32-39.
    [16]
    曾德智,陶冶,郭锋,等. 高温高酸性回注井环空保护液复配实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏,2020,27(2):152-156.

    ZENG Dezhi, TAO Ye, GUO Feng, et al. Annular protection fluid compounding experiment for high temperature-acid reinjection well[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(2):152-156.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (590) PDF downloads(42) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return