射孔相位及地应力对薄互层起裂压力及裂缝扩展影响的实验研究

俞然刚; 张尹; 郑彬涛; 杨文东; 田勇; 刘冰莹

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.01.018

射孔相位及地应力对薄互层起裂压力及裂缝扩展影响的实验研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.01.018

1. 中国石油大学(华东) 储运与建筑工程学院, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 胜利油田石油工程技术研究院, 山东东营 257000;
3. 中国石油化工股份有限公司天然气榆济管道分公司, 济南 250000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（51309238）；山东省自然科学基金（ZR2018MEE050）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（18CX02079A、17CX02028A）

详细信息

作者简介:
俞然刚,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为油气工程力学及岩土工程。E-mail:yrangang@upc.edu.cn

中图分类号: TE357.12
计量
- 文章访问数: 509
- HTML全文浏览量: 152
- PDF下载量: 162
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-10-15
- 刊出日期: 2020-02-28

Experimental Study on the Effects of Perforation Phasing on Fracturing Pressure and Fracture Propagation of Thin Interbeds

1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering in China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580;
2. Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering of Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying, Shandong 257000;
3. SINOPEC Yulin to Jinan Gas Pipeline Company, Jinan, Shandong 250000

摘要

摘要: 为了深入研究射孔相位、地应力对薄互层起裂压力及裂缝扩展的影响，采用大尺寸真三轴模拟实验系统进行水力压裂实验，通过扫描裂缝断面描述了水力裂缝扩展和分布状态，分析了射孔相位及地应力对薄互层起裂压力及裂缝扩展的影响，并进行初步的机理分析，为压裂设计和施工提供支持。实验结果表明：①岩心在射孔末端沿射孔方向开裂，随后裂缝转向，沿垂直于最小水平主应力方向扩展；相同地应力下，射孔相位60°时岩心起裂压力最小，初次开裂及压裂过程用时最短，且裂缝扩展或产生新缝数量多、形式复杂。②当垂向主应力与最大水平主应力差较大且水平主应力差较小时，岩心起裂压力较小，裂缝扩展过程平稳，受岩石断裂韧性影响微弱；当垂向主应力与最大水平主应力差较小时，水平主应力差越大，则起裂压力越大，裂缝扩展次数越少，压裂过程用时越短。③当水平主应力差较大时，裂缝沿垂向扩展明显，断裂面平直且垂直于最小水平主应力方向；当水平主应力差较小时，裂缝扩展方向难控制，易产生偏转或横向裂缝。④水力裂缝与结构面相遇时产生支裂缝，以及出现分叉、转向、穿层等现象是形成复杂裂缝网络的必要条件。层理影响裂缝穿层，微裂隙与微空隙对起裂压力和裂缝扩展均有影响。
- 射孔相位 /
- 地应力 /
- 薄互层 /
- 水力压裂 /
- 物模实验 /
- 起裂压力 /
- 裂缝扩展
Abstract: Hydraulic fracturing experiment was performed using a large-scale real tri-axial simulation experiment system to extensively investigate the effects of perforation phasing and geo-stress on the fracture-initiation pressure and fracture propagation of thin interbeds. By scanning the fracture section, the hydraulic fracture propagation and distribution status were described, the effects of perforation phasing and geo-stress on the fracture-initiation pressure and fracture propagation as well as the basic mechanisms were analyzed. These researches can be used to provide support to fracturing design and operations. Experimental results showed that, ① rock samples in the test fractured at the end of perforation section, and the fracture diverted to propagate along the direction perpendicular to the direction of the minimum horizontal principal stress. A minimum fracture-initiation pressure existed under the same geo-stress and at 60° perforation phase, and the time spent in initial fracturing and in fracturing process was the shortest. Also under the same conditions, the fractures propagated most extensively, the number of fractures was the highest and the forms of the fractures were complex. ② when the difference between the vertical principal stress and the maximum horizontal principal stress was high, and the differential horizontal principal stresses was low, the fracture-initiation pressure was then low. The process of fracture propagation was steady, and was only weakly affected by rock breakdown. When the difference between the vertical principal stress and the maximum horizontal principal stress was low, the higher the differential horizontal principal stresses, the higher the fracture-initiation pressure, times for the fractures to propagate became less and time spent for fracturing was short. ③ When the differential horizontal principal stresses was high, the propagation of the fractures was evidently along the vertical direction. The fracturing section was flat and perpendicular to the minimum horizontal principal stress. When the differential horizontal principal stresses was low, the direction of the propagation of the fractures was difficult to control; it was easy for the fractures to deflect or to propagate along transverse direction. 4) When the hydraulic fracture met with structural plane, sub-fractures as well as bifurcation, deflection and cross-layer were generated. These were the necessary conditions for a complex fracture network to form. Formation bedding affects cross-layer of fractures, and micro-fissures and micro-pores all affects fracture-initiation pressure and fracture propagation.
- Perforation phasing /
- Geo-stress /
- Thin interbed /
- Hydraulic fracturing /
- Physical model experiment /
- Fracture-initiation pressure /
- Fracture propagation

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	衡帅,杨春和,曾义金,等.页岩水力压裂裂缝形态的实验研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(7):1243-1251. HENG Shuai, YANG Chunhe, ZENG Yijin, et al. Experimental study on hydraulic fracture geometry of shale[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(7):1243-1251.
[2]	郭印同,杨春和,贾长贵,等.页岩水力压裂物理模拟与裂缝表征方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(1):52-59. GUO Yintong, YANG Chunhe, JIA Changgui, et al. Research on hydraulic fracturing physical simulation of shale and fracture characterization methods[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(1):52-59.
[3]	解经宇,蒋国胜,王荣璟,等.射孔对页岩水力裂缝形态形象的物理模拟实验[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(3):776-783. XIE Jingyu, JIANG Guosheng, WANG Rongjing, et al. Experimental investigation on the influence of perforation of the hydraulic fracture geometry in shale[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(3):776-783.
[4]	蔺海晓,杜春志.煤岩拟三轴水力压裂实验研究[J].煤炭学报, 2014, 36(11):1801-1805. LIN Haixiao, DU Chunzhi. Experimental research on the quasi three-axis hydraulic fracturing of coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 36(11):1801-1805.
[5]	张帆,马耕,刘晓,等.大尺寸真三轴煤岩水力压裂模拟实验与裂缝扩展分析[J].岩土力学, 2019, 40(5):1-8. ZHANG Fan, MA Geng, LIU Xiao, et al. Analysis of hydraulic fracture propagation in coal rock by large-scale true triaxial hydraulic fracturing simulation experiment[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5):1-8.
[6]	FALLAHZADEH S H, RASOULI V, et al. An investigation of hydraulic fracturing initiation and nearwellbore propagation from perforated boreholes in tight formations[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(2):573-584
[7]	DEHGHAN AN, GOSHTASBI K, AHANGARI K, et al. Mechanism of fracture initiation and propagation using a tri-axial hydraulic fracturing test system in naturally fractured reservoirs[J].European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2016, 20(5):560-585.
[8]	陈勉,庞飞,金衍.大尺寸真三轴水力压裂模拟与分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2000, 19(增刊):868-872. CHEN Mian, PANG Fei, JIN Yan. Experiments and analysis on hydraulic fracturing by a large-size triaxial simulator[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2000 , 19(Suppl):868-872.
[9]	刘玉章,付海峰,丁云宏,等.层间应力差对水力裂缝扩展影响的大尺度实验模拟与分析[J].石油钻采工艺, 2014, 36(4):88-92. LIU Yuzhang, FU Haifeng, DING Yunhong, et al. Large scale experimental simulation and analysis of interlayer stress difference effect on hydraulic fracture extension[J]. Oil Drilling&Production Technology,2014,36(4):88-92.
[10]	肖晖,郭建春,卢聪,等.F142区块大型压裂技术研究与应用[J].石油钻探技术, 2012, 40(6):90-95. XIAO Hui, GUO Jianchun, LU Cong, et al. Research and application of large-scale fracturing in Block F142[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2012, 40(6):90-95.
[11]	廖林,田多文,车璐飞,等.薄互层泥云岩储层裂缝预测方法研究[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2016, 45(2):347-356. LIAO Lin, TIAN Duowen, CHE Lufei, et al. Fracture prediction in thin interbed mud-dolomite reservoir[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology, 2016, 45(2):347-356.
[12]	YAN Tie, LI Wei, BI Xueliang. An experimental study of fracture initiation mechanisms during hydraulic fracturing[J]. Petroleum Science, 2011, 8(1):87-92.
[13]	高英.薄互层低渗透油藏压裂开发裂缝扩展规律及产能预测研究[D].北京:北京科技大学, 2015. GAO Ying. Productivity prediction of fractured well and propagation law of hydraulic fractures in thin inter-bedded low permeability reservoirs[D]. Beijing:University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2015.
[14]	HOSSIAN M M, RAHMAN M K, RAHMAN S S. Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation:roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regimes[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2000, 27(3/4):129-149.
[15]	YEW C HM LI Y. Fracturing of a deviated well[J]. SPE Production Engineering, 1988, 3(4):429-437.
[16]	姜浒,陈勉,张广清,等.定向射孔对水力裂缝起裂与延伸的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(7):1321-1326. JIANG Hu, CHEN Mian, ZHANG Guangqing, et al. Impact of oriented perforation on hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(7):1321-1326.
[17]	ROMERO J, MACK M G, ELBEL J L.Theoretical model and numerical investigation of near-wellbore effects in hydraulic fracturing[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition:Drilling and Completion. Houston, USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1995:569-578.