留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

缝洞型油藏雾化酸深部酸化机理研究

苏徐航 齐宁 王一伟 潘林 徐志鹏

苏徐航, 齐宁, 王一伟, 潘林, 徐志鹏. 缝洞型油藏雾化酸深部酸化机理研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(6): 771-776. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.06.020
引用本文: 苏徐航, 齐宁, 王一伟, 潘林, 徐志鹏. 缝洞型油藏雾化酸深部酸化机理研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(6): 771-776. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.06.020
SU Xuhang, QI Ning, WANG Yiwei, PAN Lin, XU Zhipeng. Study on the Mechanisms of In-depth Acid Job of Atomized Acids in Fractured and Vuggy Reservoirs[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2019, 36(6): 771-776. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.06.020
Citation: SU Xuhang, QI Ning, WANG Yiwei, PAN Lin, XU Zhipeng. Study on the Mechanisms of In-depth Acid Job of Atomized Acids in Fractured and Vuggy Reservoirs[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2019, 36(6): 771-776. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.06.020

缝洞型油藏雾化酸深部酸化机理研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.06.020
基金项目: 

国家“十三五”科技重大专项“中亚和中东地区复杂碳酸盐岩油气藏采油采气关键技术研究与应用”(2017ZX005030005);山东省自然科学基金“基于蚓孔竞争机制的自转向酸酸蚀蚓孔描述及动态酸化模拟研究”(ZR2017ME003);2019年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“碳酸盐岩酸化酸蚀蚓孔竞争机制基础研究”(19CX02067A)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    苏徐航,在读硕士研究生;电话17806237741;E-mail:suxuhang@163.com

    通讯作者:

    齐宁,副教授/硕士生导师,2007年获中国石油大学(华东)油气田开发工程专业工学博士,现在中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院任教,主要从事采油工程领域的教学与科研工作。电话15898855079

  • 中图分类号: TE357.12

Study on the Mechanisms of In-depth Acid Job of Atomized Acids in Fractured and Vuggy Reservoirs

  • 摘要: 缝洞型油藏发育大量溶洞和裂缝、非均质性强,酸化施工时酸液会优先进入并扩大溶洞,影响蚓孔延伸。针对注气开发的缝洞型油藏,提出雾化酸酸化工艺,雾化酸可有效沟通不连续的缝洞储集体,形成有利的油气渗流通道。为明确雾化酸井筒稳定流动界限,采用雾状流井筒流动模拟实验,发现在20℃、标准大气压、60 m3/h的气体注入速度、20mL/min的液体注入速度、0.5%的十二烷基苯磺酸钠雾化稳定剂浓度下,雾状流最为稳定。通过酸岩反应动力学实验,发现在130℃、转速为110 r/min、初始酸浓度为15%时,常规酸酸岩反应速度为20.12×10-6 mol/(cm2·s),而雾化酸为1.87×10-6mol/(cm2 · s),比常规酸小一个数量级,雾化酸具有优良的缓速效果。未添加缓蚀剂时,常规酸对N80钢的腐蚀速率为572.16 mm/a,而雾化酸为40.08 mm/a,不及常规酸的十分之一,雾化酸对管柱缓蚀效果显著。

     

  • [1] 王敬,刘慧卿,徐杰,等. 缝洞型油藏剩余油形成机制及分布规律[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(5):585-590.

    WANG Jing,LIU Huiqing,XU Jie,et al. Formation mechanism and distribution law of remaining oil in fracture-cavity reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(5):585-590.
    [2] 段毅,于文修,郑朝阳,等. 塔里木盆地塔河油田原油与源岩对比研究[J]. 沉积学报,2009,27(1):164-171.

    DUAN Yi,YU Wenxiu,ZHENG Zhaoyang,et al. Study of oil-source correlation for Tahe oilfield of Tarim basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2009,27(1):164-171.
    [3] 戴彩丽,方吉超,焦保雷,等. 中国碳酸盐岩缝洞型油藏提高采收率研究进展[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(6):67-78. DAI Caili,FANG Jichao,JIAO Baolei,et al. Development of the research on EOR for carbonate fractured-vuggy reservoirs in China[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2018,42(6):67-78.
    [4] 肖长久,曾庆恒. 低孔低渗碳酸盐岩储层酸化改造技术研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版),2010, 12(6):28-30,40. XIAO Changjiu,ZENG Qingheng. Acidizing treatment of carbonate reservoir with low porosity and low permeability[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences Edition), 2010,12(6):28-30,40.
    [5] 缑新俊,赵立强,刘平礼. 基质酸化发展现状[J]. 钻采工艺,2002,25(2):40-44.

    GOU Xinjun,ZHAO Liqiang,LIU Pingli. Development status of matrix acidizing[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2002,25(2):40-44.
    [6] 董军,李建波,邱海燕,等. 酸化技术研究现状[J]. 科协论坛(下半月),2007,(3):18-19. DONG Jun,LI Jianbo,QIU Haiyan,et al. Research status of acidification technology[J].Science & Technology Association Forum,2007,(3):18-19.
    [7] 李志. 碳酸盐岩储层非常规酸化改造[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2016. LI Zhi. An Unconventional Way of Carbonate Reservoir Acidizing Treatment[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2016.
    [8] CHANG FRANK,QU QI,FRENIER WAYNE. A novel self-diverting-acid developed for matrix stimulation of carbonate reservoirs[J]. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry,2001:1-9.
    [9] 演春. 酸液滤失对酸化施工的影响研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2005,28(4):55-56

    ,60. YAN Chun. Research on the acid leak-off influence during acidizing operation in carbonate formation[J]. Drilling & Production Technology,2005,28(4):55-56,60.
    [10] 胡忠前,马喜平,罗宇峰,等. 一种新型酸液胶凝剂的合成与性能评价[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2007,24(2):56-59.

    HU Zhongqian,MA Xiping,LUO Yufeng,et al. The synthesis and performance evaluation of two novel gelling agents[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2007,24(2):56-59.
    [11] 魏星,王永刚,郑淑媛. 碳酸盐岩储层酸化工作液现状研究[J]. 西部探矿工程,2008,20(8):63-65.

    WEI Xing,WANG Yonggang,ZHENG Shuyuan. Current study on acid applying to carbonate reservoir[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering,2008,20(8):63-65.
    [12] 陈冀嵋,赵立强,刘平礼. 固体酸性能评价及与碳酸盐岩反应特性的研究[J]. 西南石油学院学报,2005, 27(2):57-60.

    CHEN Jimei,ZHAO Liqiang,LIU Pingli. Evaluation of performances on powder acid and experimental investigation of reaction characteristics with carbonate[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University,2005,27(2):57-60.
    [13] 曹继虎,路勇,刘明生,等. 氮气泡沫酸化工艺技术在低渗透油藏的现场应用[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量,2014,34(9):166-167.

    CAO Jihu,LU Yong,LIU Mingsheng,et al. Field application of nitrogen foam acidizing technology in low permeability reservoirs[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2014,34(9):166-167.
    [14] 张敏健. 喷嘴研究发展概述[J]. 电站系统工程,2008, 24(1):17-18.

    ZHANG Minjian. Summarize of nozzle investigation development[J]. Power System Engineering,2008,24(1):17-18.
    [15] 张淑荣. 气流式雾化喷嘴的特性研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学,2006. ZHANG Shurong. Character study on air-blast atomizer[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2006.
    [16] 陈姣,袁舒欣,杨刚,等. 一种文丘里雾化喷嘴设计[J]. 机械研究与应用,2015,28(2):114-115

    ,120. CHEN Jiao,YUAN Shuxin,YANG Gang,et al. Design for a spray nozzle based on venturi tube[J]. Mechanical Research & Application,2015,28(2):114-115,120.
    [17] 朱永东. 酸岩反应动力学实验研究方法评述[J]. 内蒙古石油化工,2008,34(10):23-25.

    ZHU Yongdong. Overview of experimental methods of acid rock reaction kinetics[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry,2008,34(10):23-25.
    [18] 齐宁,孙逊,樊家铖,等. 酸岩反应动力学关键问题及其进展[J]. 科学技术与工程,2019,19(7):1-6.

    QI Ning,SUN Xun,FAN Jiacheng,et al. The key problem and progress of acid-rock reaction dynamics[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2019,19(7):1-6.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  573
  • HTML全文浏览量:  212
  • PDF下载量:  129
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-09-05
  • 刊出日期:  2019-12-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回