碳酸盐岩储层压井液漏失影响因素研究

朱方辉; 李明星; 贺炳成; 刘伟; 李琼玮

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.023

碳酸盐岩储层压井液漏失影响因素研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.023

朱方辉^1,2,
李明星^1,2,
贺炳成³,
刘伟^1,2,
李琼玮^1,2

1. 低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室, 西安 710018;
2. 中国石油长庆油田分公司油气工艺研究院, 西安 710018;
3. 中国石油长庆油田分公司第十采油厂, 甘肃庆阳 745100

基金项目:

中国石油天然气股份有限公司长庆油田5000万吨持续高效稳产关键技术研究与应用课题11（2016E-0511）

详细信息

作者简介:
朱方辉,1982年生,高级工程师,主要从事油气田化学剂研究及腐蚀防护方面工作。电话(029)86593149;E-mail:zfh_cq@petrochina.com.cn

中图分类号: TE37
计量
- 文章访问数: 545
- HTML全文浏览量: 178
- PDF下载量: 220
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-04-05
- 刊出日期: 2019-08-30

Factors Affecting Loss of Kill Mud Used in Carbonate Rock Reservoirs

1. National Engineering Laboratory of Low Permeability Oil and Gas Field Exploration and Development, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018;
2. Research Institute of Oil and Gas Technology, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018;
3. Oil Production Plant No. 10, Changqing Oilfield Company, Qingyang, 745100

摘要

摘要: 长庆碳酸盐岩气藏裂缝及孔洞较为发育，层间差异明显，非均质程度较严重，压裂改造后的储层裂缝更为复杂，此类气藏处于开发后期的气井在开展压井修井作业时，常规压井液漏失量大，漏失主要影响因素不清楚。围绕典型井的地质参数、生产数据，采用沃伦-茹特双渗模型，通过拟合产水量、产气量和地层平均压力修正模型，5种因素的数值模拟结果表明，井筒液柱正压差、压井液黏度和裂缝渗透率是影响压井液漏失最敏感的因素，但可控因素为液柱正压差和裂缝渗透率。适当增加压井液黏度和降低液柱正压差可较好控制漏失，但采取高黏度压井液会造成泵送困难，且易产生吸附滞留损害，增加黏度的另一个极端就是增加黏弹性（弹性），一方面可增加压井液往地层的渗流阻力，此外也可以有效承压。根据研究结果，提出了以弹性凝胶为方向的长庆碳酸盐岩暂堵压井液研究思路。
- 碳酸盐岩 /
- 气藏 /
- 压井液漏失 /
- 数值模拟 /
- 暂堵
Abstract: The carbonate gas reservoir in Changqing oilfield isfull of fractures and vugs, different zones have quite different characteristics, andsevere inhomogeneity exists in the formations. Fracturing stimulation only makes the fractures in the reservoir much more complex. In the late period of development, workover operation performed on a well killed with a kill mud has always been facing with high volume of mud losses and factors of the mud losses are not well defined. To find out the affecting factors of the mud losses, numerical simulation of 5 factors has been conducted using the Warren-Root dual-permeability model by analyzing the geological data and production data of the typical wells and by fitting the water production rate, the gas production rate and the average formation pressure. The results of the numerical simulation show that the most important factors affecting mud losses are the positive differential pressure of the fluid column inside the well, the viscosity of the kill mud and the permeability of the fractures, of which only the differential pressure and the permeability are controllable. By moderately increasing the viscosity of the kill mud and decreasing the positive differential pressure of the fluid column inside a well, mud losses can be well controlled.The problem is that the high viscosity will result in difficulties in pumping the kill mud and formation damage from adsorption and detention of the kill mud. Viscosity increase of a kill mud can be achieved by increasing its viscoelasticity; this not only increases the resistance to the flow of kill mud into formations, it also renders the kill mud pressure bearing capacity. An idea of using elastic gel as the kill mud with temporary plugging capacity in Changqing is presented in this paper based on the research achievements.
- Carbonate rock /
- Gas reservoir /
- Loss of kill mud /
- Numerical simulation /
- Temporary plugging

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	王业众, 康毅力, 游利军, 等. 裂缝性储层漏失机理及控制技术研究进展[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2007, 24(4):74-77. WANG Yezhong, KANG Yili, YOU Lijun, et al. Progresses in mechanism study and control:mud losses to fractured reservoirs[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2007, 24(4):74-77.
[2]	刘大伟, 康毅力, 刘静, 等. 钻井液完井液屏蔽环重复形成的实验模拟[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2005, 22(6):26-29. LIU Dawei, KANG Yili, LIU Jing, et al. Experimental simulation on shield ring formation repeatedly by drill ing fluid & completion fluid[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2005, 22(6):26-29.
[3]	刘静, 康毅力, 陈锐, 等. 碳酸盐岩储层损害机理及保护技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(1):99-101. LIU Jing, KANG Yili, CHEN Rui, et al. Present research situation and developing trend of formation damage mechanism and protection technology for carbonate rocks[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(1):99-101.
[4]	樊世忠, 窦红梅. 保护油气层技术发展趋势[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2001, 28(1):78-84. FAN Shizhong, DOU Hongmei. The development trend of reservoir protection technology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2001, 28(1):78-84.
[5]	J E WARREN, P J ROOT. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1963, 3(3):245-255.
[6]	程林松. 高等渗流力学[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2014:168-176. CHENG Linsong. Advanced seepage mechanics[M].. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2014.
[7]	贾虎, 吴晓虎. 考虑相态变化的凝析气藏压井液漏失机理与产能恢复[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(4):622-629. JIA Hu, WU Xiaohu. Killing fluid loss mechanism and productivity recovery in a gas condensate reservoir considering the phase behavior change[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(4):622-629.
[8]	HASSAN BAHRAMI, REZA REZAEE, BEN CLENNELL. Water blocking damage in hydraulically fractured tight sand gas reservoirs:An example from Perth Basin, Western Australia[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, 88-89:100-106.
[9]	JOSHUA THOMAS ANDREWS, HASSAN BAHRAMI, REZA REZAEE, et al. Effect of liquid invasion and capillary pressure on wireline formation tester measurements in tight gas reservoirs[C]//paper 154649-MS presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, 9-11 July 2012, Tianjin, China. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/154649-MS.
[10]	MITCHEL TSAR, HASSAN BAHRAMI, REZA REZAEE, et al. Effect of drilling fluid (water-based vs oil-based) on phase trap damage in tight sand gas reservoirs[C]//Paper 154652-MS presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference, 4-7 June 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/154652-MS.
[11]	ABDULLAH BIN ZIAD, DMITRⅡ GROMAKOVSKⅡ, ABDULAZIZ AL-SAGR, et al. First successful application of temporary gel plug replacing calcium carbonate chips to isolate depleted reservoir, case study from Saudi Arabia gas field[C]//paper 178986-MS presented at the SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 24-26 February 2016, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/178986-MS
[12]	汪成, 林梅钦, 李明远, 等.LWZ强凝胶压井液的室内评价[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2012, 25(6):39-43. WANG Cheng, LIN Meiqin, LI Mingyuan, et al. Laboratory evaluation of LWZ killing fluid strong gel[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2012, 25(6):39-43.
[13]	谢英, 熊启勇, 孟祥娟, 等. 一种新型低固相油溶性暂堵型修井液的研制[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2016, 45(4):68-72. XIE Ying, XIONG Qiyong, MENG Xiangjuan, et al. Preparation of a new oil-soluble plugging workover liquid with low solid phase[J].Chemical Engineering of Oil&Gas, 2016, 45(4):68-72.
[14]	马喜平, 许帅, 王晓磊, 等. 低压气藏用低密度无固相泡沫修井液的研制及试验[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2015, 43(5):100-104. MA Xiping, XU Shuai, WANG Xiaolei, et al. Development and experiment of low-density and solidfree foam workover fluid for low pressure gas reservoir[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2015, 43(5):100-104.
[15]	董军, 樊松林, 郭元庆, 等. 新型低密度微泡沫防漏修井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2013, 30(1):22-25. DONG Jun, FAN Songlin, GUO Yuanqing, et al. Research on technology of novel low-density micro-foam workover fluid[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2013, 30(1):22-25.
[16]	王洋. 裂缝型储层酸液滤失可视化研究与应用[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(1):107-110 , 117. WANG Yang. Research on the visualization of acidizing fluid filtration in fractured reservoirs and its application[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 40(1):107-110, 117.
[17]	ADAM WILSON. Novel, thermally stable fluid-Loss pill performs better than guar-based gels[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2013, 65(11):134-136.
[18]	PUBUDU GAMAGE, JAY P DEVILLE, BILL SHUMWAY. Performance and formation damage assessment of a novel, thermally stable solids-free fluid loss gel[C]//Paper 165096-MS presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference & Exhibition, 5-7 June 2013, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/165096-MS.