留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

固井水泥环界面滤饼力学性能评价方法及其影响规律

刘健 宋伟涛 李进 李早元 刘遥瑶 周勇 毛久熊

刘健,宋伟涛,李进,等. 固井水泥环界面滤饼力学性能评价方法及其影响规律[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2025,42(5):646-655 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.05.011
引用本文: 刘健,宋伟涛,李进,等. 固井水泥环界面滤饼力学性能评价方法及其影响规律[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2025,42(5):646-655 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.05.011
LIU Jian, SONG Weitao, LI Jin, et al.Mechanical properties of filter cake on well cement sheath: an evaluation method and how they are affected[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2025, 42(5):646-655 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.05.011
Citation: LIU Jian, SONG Weitao, LI Jin, et al.Mechanical properties of filter cake on well cement sheath: an evaluation method and how they are affected[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2025, 42(5):646-655 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.05.011

固井水泥环界面滤饼力学性能评价方法及其影响规律

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.05.011
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目“固井水泥环界面密封损伤机理与改善机制研究”(52274010);中国石油青年科技专项“川渝高压气井水泥环全生命周期密封失效机理及控制机制研究”(2024DQ03072);西南石油大学课外开放实验校级重点项目“固井水泥环界面滤饼力学性能及失效机理研究”(2022KSZ01015)。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘健,博士,高级实验师,现在主要从事油气井固井与完井方面研究。E-mail:swpiljian@126.com

  • 中图分类号: TE 256.9

Mechanical Properties of Filter Cake on Well Cement Sheath: An Evaluation Method and How They Are Affected

  • 摘要: 页岩气井常采用多级分段压裂技术,环空带压问题将严重影响其长期稳定安全高效开发,井筒水泥环力学状态及水泥环界面承载能力是保证井筒长期密封性能的关键。水泥环界面滤饼层作为井筒最为薄弱区,其力学性能直接关系到水泥环界面承载能力。当前直接测量固井二界面滤饼层力学性能非常困难,构建了滤饼力学性能测试评价方法,开展了界面滤饼力学性能影响规律分析。研究结果表明,钻井液滤饼物相主要包括重晶石、有机土、碳酸钙,滤饼颗粒粒径主要集中在60~80 μm,滤饼孔隙度主要集中在10%~20%,滤饼渗透率主要集中在0.05~0.15 mD。滤失压差增加、有机土含量增加、滤饼孔隙度降低、滤饼含水率降低均一定程度有助于提高水泥环界面滤饼力学性能。研究成果对于认识井筒水泥环界面载荷分布,优化现场固井施工工艺方案奠定了重要的理论技术支撑。

     

  • 图  1  滤饼形成装置及形成机理示意图

    图  2  实验所需仪器设备(a:滤饼压缩固结试验设备;b:滤饼直接剪切试验设备;c:滤饼无侧限抗压强度试验设备;d:滤饼三轴压缩试验设备)

    图  3  滤饼颗粒粒径、成分含量随滤失压差的影响

    图  4  滤饼孔隙度和渗透率随滤失压差的影响

    图  5  滤失压差对滤饼力学性能的影响

    图  6  滤饼物相含量对滤饼力学性能的影响

    图  7  滤饼孔隙度对滤饼力学性能的影响

    图  8  滤饼物相含量对滤饼力学性能的影响

  • [1] 刘奎, 丁士东, 初永涛, 等. 页岩气井压裂交变载荷水泥环密封能力研究[J]. 石油机械, 2023, 51(11): 79-86.

    LIU Kui, DING Shidong, CHU Yongtao, et al. Study on sealing ability of cement sheath under cyclic loading in shale gas well fracturing[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2023, 51(11): 79-86.
    [2] 顾军, 李士超, 田亚芳, 等. 水平井固井一界面泥膜分布规律及其特性[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(8): 88-95.

    GU Jun, LI Shichao, TIAN Yafang, et al. Distribution laws and characteristics of mud films at casing-cement interfaces in horizontal wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(8): 88-95.
    [3] 孟凡荣. 页岩气超长水平井固井难点及对策分析[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2023, 35(6): 18-20.

    MENG Fanrong. Difficulties and countermeasures analysis of shale gas ultra-long horizontal well cementing[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2023, 35(6): 18-20.
    [4] 刘硕琼, 李德旗, 袁进平, 等. 页岩气井水泥环完整性研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(7): 76-82.

    LIU Shuoqiong, LI Deqi, YUAN Jinping, et al. Cement sheath integrity of shale gas wells: A case study from the Sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(7): 76-82.
    [5] 柳洪华. 油基钻井液滤饼对二界面胶结强度的影响研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2016.

    LIU Honghua. Study on the influence of oil-based drilling fluid filter cake on the cementation strength of the second interface[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
    [6] 刘开强, 赵殊勋, 李炜, 等. 提高固井第二界面质量的技术研究与应用[J]. 油田化学, 2018, 35(1): 16-21.

    LIU Kaiqiang, ZHAO Shuxun, LI Wei, et al. Research and application on improving the cementing quality of second-interface[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2018, 35(1): 16-21.
    [7] 杨宝林, 顾军, 郑涛, 等. 泥饼厚度对固井二界面胶结强度的影响[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2009, 26(1): 42-43,46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2009.01.015

    YANG Baolin, GU Jun, ZHENG Tao, et al. The influences of mud cake thickness on bonding strength of the cement-formation interface[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2009, 26(1): 42-43,46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2009.01.015
    [8] 顾军, 何吉标, 谯世均, 等. MTA方法防气窜固井技术在涩北气田的应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(4): 83-89.

    GU Jun, HE Jibiao, QIAO Shijun, et al. Application of the MTA method to gas-channeling prevention in well cementing in the Sebei Gas Field, Qaidam Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(4): 83-89.
    [9] 高元. 长裸眼恶性漏失井双重防漏固井技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2024, 41(3): 390-395. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.03.015

    GAO Yuan. Dual prevention of severe losses of cement slurries in cementing long open holes[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2024, 41(3): 390-395. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.03.015
    [10] 杜建平, 顾军, 张辉, 等. 有效提高页岩气井固井质量的泥饼固化防窜固井技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(9): 89-94. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.09.013

    DU Jianping, GU Jun, ZHANG Hui, et al. Mud cake solidification technology for improving cementing quality of shale gas wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(9): 89-94. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.09.013
    [11] LI J, LIU J, LI Z Y, et al. Influence laws for hydraulic sealing capacity in shale gas well cementing[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2023, 38(1): 120-130.
    [12] HAO H Y, GU J, HUANG J, et al. Comparative study on cementation of cement-mudcake interface with and without mud-cake-solidification-agents application in oil & gas wells[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016, 147: 143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.014
    [13] WANDJI DJOUONKEP L D, XIE B Q, TAO H Z, et al. Enhanced amphoteric polymer filtration reducer with vinyl-functionalized nanosilica for high-salt and ultra-high temperature water-based drilling environments[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, 236: 212743. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.212743
    [14] AMANULLAH M. A novel laboratory method for assessing the erosional characteristics of mudcakes[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2006, 21(2): 245-251.
    [15] CERASI P R, TORSÆTER J, BERNTSEN A N, et al. Scratch testing applied to drilling fluid filter cakes: effect of cutter velocity and comparison of different mud formulations[C]//Paper presented at the SPE Bergen One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, 2015: SPE-173885-MS.
    [16] CERASI P, LARSEN I, STENEBRÅTEN J F, et al. Scratch testing of drilling mud filter cakes[C]//Paper presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 2006: SPE-100130-MS.
    [17] 侯卓识. 水平井固井顶替钻井液滞留模型研究[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2012.

    HOU Zhuoshi. Cementing displace drilling fluid retention model research in the horizontal well[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2012.
    [18] 吴彦先, 赵增新, 巩加芹, 等. 清除井壁滤饼提高固井质量的冲洗液性能影响研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2025, 42(3): 398-405. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.03.017

    WU Yanxian, ZHAO Zengxin, GONG Jiaqin, et al. Study on factors affecting properties of flushing fluids for removing mud cakes to improve well cementing quality[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2025, 42(3): 398-405. doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2025.03.017
    [19] 徐大伟, 汪晓静, 徐春虎, 等. 且深1井盐层尾管超高温高密度固井水泥浆技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2024, 41(5): 622-629. doi: doi:10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.05.009

    XU Dawei, WANG Xiaojing, XU Chunhu, et al. Extra-high temperature high density cement slurry for cementing liners through salt formation in well Qieshen-1[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2024, 41(5): 622-629. doi: doi:10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.05.009
  • 加载中
图(8)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  49
  • HTML全文浏览量:  18
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-04-28
  • 修回日期:  2025-07-21
  • 刊出日期:  2025-09-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回