留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

海陆过渡相页岩储层液岩作用机理及钻井液体系构建

王维 王金堂 辛江 曹振义 林伟 刘磊 孙金声

王维,王金堂,辛江,等. 海陆过渡相页岩储层液岩作用机理及钻井液体系构建[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2024,41(4):427-436 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.04.002
引用本文: 王维,王金堂,辛江,等. 海陆过渡相页岩储层液岩作用机理及钻井液体系构建[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2024,41(4):427-436 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.04.002
WANG Wei, WANG Jintang, XIN Jiang, et al.Mechanism of fluid shale interaction and construction of drilling fluid system in marine land transitional shale reservoirs[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2024, 41(4):427-436 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.04.002
Citation: WANG Wei, WANG Jintang, XIN Jiang, et al.Mechanism of fluid shale interaction and construction of drilling fluid system in marine land transitional shale reservoirs[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2024, 41(4):427-436 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.04.002

海陆过渡相页岩储层液岩作用机理及钻井液体系构建

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.04.002
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王维,1989年生,硕士,工程师,现在主要从事非常规油气钻完井液方面的研究工作。E-mail:527880533@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    王金堂,博士,中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院副教授,主要研究方向为地下难动用油气资源钻井液理论技术研究与工程实践。 E-mail:wangjintang163@126.com

  • 中图分类号: TE254

Mechanism of Fluid Shale Interaction and Construction of Drilling Fluid System in Marine Land Transitional Shale Reservoirs

More Information
  • 摘要: 我国海陆过渡相页岩地质储量大、资源丰度高,开发前景广阔。但钻井过程中井壁极易发生掉块、坍塌,导致井壁失稳影响钻井安全。本文通过钻井岩心观察、电镜和CT扫描、X射线衍射分析等相关实验,得到储层岩样矿物组分及微观结构等特征,结果表明:页岩气储层全岩主要含石英和黏土矿物,地层黏土矿物含量高达45.7%,且黏土矿物中不含蒙脱石,高岭石含量为35%,伊/蒙混层含量为26%;岩样表面纳微米孔隙和微裂缝发育,裂缝宽度在微米级并连通多条窄裂缝;通过岩液作用后晶层间距、表面张力、线性膨胀率和裂缝扩展变化分析,海陆过渡相页岩仅发生表面水化,揭示了海陆过渡相页岩气储层岩液作用机理。优选了水基钻井液抑制剂、封堵剂与润滑剂,构建了一套海陆过渡相页岩气储层的高性能水基钻井液体系,并对其展开了室内评价。钻井液常规性能、抑制性、封堵性、润滑性评价实验结果表明,该钻井液体系抗温100 ℃,高温高压失水6 mL,泥页岩膨胀率为1.03%,钻井液润滑系数整体小于0.15,体系30 min的API滤失量较基浆降低40%,可对地层微裂缝实现有效封堵,且生物毒性EC50值为37 260 mg/L,属于无毒级别,能够满足海陆过渡相页岩气钻井作业施工对钻井液性能的要求并进行了现场应用,封堵防塌效果良好,可有效解决海陆过渡相泥页岩井壁失稳的技术难题。

     

  • 图  1  山西组海陆过渡相页岩岩样扫描电镜图片

    图  2  山西组海陆过渡相页岩岩样微裂缝三维模型图

    图  3  岩样浸泡前后晶层间距实测数据

    图  4  岩样在不同抑制剂溶液中的线性膨胀率

    图  5  岩样在不同抑制剂复配体系中的线性膨胀率

    图  6  钻井液体系的线性膨胀率

    图  7  老化前后极压润滑系数(80 ℃/16 h)

    表  1  大吉3-4山西组海陆过渡相页岩全岩矿物组成及黏土矿物组成表

    矿物组成/%黏土矿物/%
    石 英钾长石斜长石菱铁矿黄铁矿铁白云石黏土矿物伊蒙混层伊利石高岭石绿泥石
    43.00.41.23.32.04.445.726293510
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  山西组海陆过渡相页岩岩心粉溶解水样的水质组成

    阳离子 矿化度/(mg·L−1 阴离子 矿化度/ (mg·L−1
    Na+ 529.233 F 1.191
    K+ 543.693 Cl 363.666
    Ca+ 111.285 Br 0.924
    Mg2+ 10.590 NO32− 0.594
    Sr2+ 5.280 SO42− 1594.386
    Ba2+ 0.393 NO2− 0.843
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  岩样在不同抑制剂溶液中的毛管力

    抑制剂 接触
    角/°
    表面张力/
    mN·m−1
    0.1 μm微裂缝
    毛管力/MPa
    0.5 μm微裂缝
    毛管力/MPa
    去离子水 9.20 72.75 1.44 0.29
    1%聚胺 14.70 58.03 1.12 0.22
    1%KCl 14.20 72.30 1.40 0.28
    1%甲酸钾 14.40 71.11 1.38 0.28
    1%疏水抑制剂 35.50 36.64 0.60 0.12
    1%甲酸钠 14.40 71.73 1.39 0.28
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  山西组海陆过渡相页岩浸泡后裂缝扩展情况

    浸泡时间/d 去离子水 1%甲酸钾 1%KCl 1%聚胺 1%疏水抑制剂
    0
    3
    13
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  不同浓度KCl和甲酸钾水活度

    序号样品水分活度
    11%甲酸钾0.968
    23%甲酸钾0.961
    35%甲酸钾0.958
    43% KCl0.965
    55% KCl0.953
    67% KCl0.943
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  白沥青加量优选

    编号膨润土浆/%白沥青/%FLAPI/mL
    12040
    221.030
    321.526
    422.024
    522.523
    623.022
    723.520
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  超细碳酸钙加量优选

    编号CMJ-2/
    %
    白沥青/
    %
    乳化石蜡/
    %
    超细碳酸/
    %
    微孔滤膜
    滤失量/mL
    17.8
    212117.2
    312127.0
    412126.4
    512136.0
    612146.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  8  CMJ-2加量优选

    编号CMJ-2/
    %
    白沥青/
    %
    乳化石蜡/
    %
    超细碳
    酸钙/%
    微孔滤膜
    滤失量/mL
    10.52136.6
    21.02136.0
    31.52135.6
    42.02135.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  9  乳化石蜡加量优选

    编号CMJ-2/
    %
    白沥青/
    %
    乳化石蜡/
    %
    超细碳
    酸钙/%
    微孔滤膜
    滤失量/mL
    11.521.035.6
    21.521.535.4
    31.522.034.8
    41.522.535.2
    51.523.035.4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  10  不同润滑剂极压润滑系数

    样品老化前/后润滑系数
    基浆0.486/0.527
    2.0%高密度钻井液润滑剂+2%基浆0.150/0.151
    2.0%甘油单油酸酯+2%基浆0.112/0.126
    2.0% LUBE +2%基浆0.144/0.162
    2.0%油酸甲酯+2%基浆0.142/0.145
    注:实验条件,80 ℃条件下热滚16 h后常温条件下测定。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  11  水基钻井液老化前后性能

    条件AV/
    mPa·s
    PV/
    mPa·s
    YP/
    Pa
    Gel/
    Pa/Pa
    FLAPI/
    mL
    FLHTHP/
    mL
    EP
    老化前35.02782/164.48.80.0850
    80 ℃老化后41.03293/183.46.00.1147
    100 ℃老化后41.5329.52/172.66.00.1225
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  12  不同污染条件下钻井液老化前后性能

    污染源实验
    条件
    AV/
    mPa·s
    PV/
    mPa·s
    YP/
    Pa
    Gel/
    Pa/Pa
    FLAPI /
    mL
    10%NaCl热滚前39.528.511.01/125.2
    热滚后36.529.07.52/114.0
    1%CaCl2热滚前42.030.012.03.5/276.4
    热滚后49.033.016.015/345.2
    8%膨润土热滚前43.533.010.53/254.4
    热滚后46.035.011.04/354.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  13  不同污染条件下钻井液老化前后性能

    t/min基浆滤失量/mL水基钻井液体系滤失量/mL
    000
    104.52.4
    207.83.2
    3010.24.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  14  JY-P03-1H井水平段钻井液性能

    井深/
    m
    ρ/
    g·cm−3
    FV/
    s
    PV/
    mPa·s
    YP/
    Pa
    PV/YP/
    mPa·s/Pa
    FLAPI/
    mL
    滤饼厚度/
    mm
    pH
    2657 1.40 60 39 11.0 0.28 2.6 0.3 9
    2796 1.41 65 40 12.5 0.31 2.6 0.3 9
    2908 1.43 68 41 13.5 0.33 2.2 0.3 9
    2993 1.45 70 39 11.5 0.29 2.6 0.3 9
    3146 1.45 72 38 13.5 0.36 2.5 0.3 9
    3232 1.45 71 37 13.5 0.36 2.6 0.3 9
    3490 1.45 75 40 14.0 0.35 2.4 0.3 9
    3603 1.45 75 40 13.5 0.34 2.4 0.3 9
    3711 1.45 82 38 16.5 0.43 2.4 0.3 9
    3865 1.45 87 37 17.5 0.47 2.4 0.3 9
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 曹涛涛, 邓模, 肖娟宜, 等. 海陆过渡相页岩储层特征及含气赋存机理——基于与海相页岩储层对比的认识[J]. 天然气地球科学,2023,34(1):122-139.

    CAO Taotao, DENG Mo, XIAO Juanyi, et al. Reservoir characteristics of marine-continental transitional shale and gas-bearing mechanism: understanding based on comparison with marine shale reservoir[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(1):122-139.
    [2] HE Q B, CHEN S J, LI S X, et al. Organic geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation mechanism of marine-continental transitional organic-rich shale: a case study from the Shanxi formation in the eastern margin of the Ordos basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 219:111116. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111116
    [3] 李萧, 孙寅森. 鄂尔多斯盆地山西组海陆过渡相泥页岩孔隙结构特征[J]. 中国石油大学胜利学院学报,2021,35(3):17-21.

    LI Xiao, SUN Yinsen. Pore structure characteristics of marine continental transitional mud shale in the Shanxi formation of the Ordos basin[J]. Journal of Shandong Institute of Petroleum and Chemical Technology, 2021, 35(3):17-21.
    [4] ZHANG L, ZHAO Q, PENG S, et al. Paleoenvironment and organic matter accumulation mechanism of Marine–continental transitional shales: outcrop characterizations of the carboniferous–permian strata, Ordos basin, North China[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(21):7445. doi: 10.3390/en14217445
    [5] 郭为, 高金亮, 李海, 等. 中国海陆过渡相页岩气地质开发特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘山西组和四川盆地龙潭组页岩气为例[J]. 矿产勘查,2023,14(3):448-458.

    GUO Wei, GAO Jinliang, LI Hai, et al. The geological and production characteristics of marine-continental transitional shale gas in China: taking the example of shale gas from Shanxi Formation in Ordos basin and Longtan formation in Sichuan basin[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2023, 14(3):448-458.
    [6] 李琪琪, 徐尚. 海陆过渡相页岩储层研究现状与展望[J]. 地质通报,2022,41(8):1417-1429.

    LI Qiqi, XU Shang. Research status and prospects of marine-continental transitional shale reservoirs[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2022, 41(8):1417-1429.
    [7] 康圆, 孙金声, 吕开河, 等. 一种页岩气疏水强封堵水基钻井液[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2021,38(4):442-448.

    KANG Yuan, SUN Jinsheng, LYU Kaihe, et al. Research on a water-based drilling fluid for shale gas drainage and strong blocking[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2021, 38(4):442-448.
    [8] MUHAMMED N S, OLAYIWOLA T, ELKATATNY S. A review on clay chemistry, characterization and shale inhibitors for water-based drilling fluids[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 206:109043. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109043
    [9] 王维, 韩金良, 亓宗凯, 等. 临汾区块煤系地层泥页岩防塌钻井液技术研究[J]. 非常规油气,2023,10(2):107-114.

    WANG Wei, HAN Jinliang, QI Zongkai, et al. Study on anti sloughing drilling fluid technology of shale in coal measure strata in Linfen block[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(2):107-114.
    [10] MONTILVA J, VAN OORT E, BRAHIM R, et al. Improved drilling performance in lake maracaibo using a low-salinity, high-performance water-based drilling fluid[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Anaheim, California, U. S. A. : SPE, 2007: SPE-110366-MS.
    [11] GOMEZ S, HE W. Fighting wellbore instability: customizing drilling fluids based on laboratory studies of shale-fluid interactions[C]//The IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition. Tianjin, China: SPE, 2012: SPE-155536-MS.
    [12] DEVILLE J P, FRITZ B, JARRETT M. Development of water-based drilling fluids customized for shale reservoirs[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2011, 26(4):484-491.
    [13] WITTHAYAPANYANON A, LELEUX J, VUILLEMET J, et al. High performance water-based drilling fluids-an environmentally friendly fluid system achieving superior shale stabilization while meeting discharge requirement offshore Cameroon[C]//SPE/IADC Drilling Conference. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SPE, 2013: SPE-163502-MS.
    [14] 刘敬平, 孙金声. 川滇页岩气水平井水基钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2017,34(2):9-14.

    LIU Jingping, SUN Jinsheng. Water base drilling fluid technology for horizontal shale gas drilling in Sichuan and Yunnan[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2017, 34(2):9-14.
    [15] 赵素娟, 游云武, 刘浩冰, 等. 涪陵焦页18-10HF井水平段高性能水基钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2019,36(5):564-569.

    ZHAO Sujuan, YOU Yunwu, LIU Haobing, et al. High performance drilling fluid for horizontal drilling in the well Jiaoyel8-10HF in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(5):564-569.
    [16] 吕方, 张古彬, 袁青松, 等. 河南海陆过渡相页岩气水基钻井液室内评价[J]. 辽宁化工,2017,46(9):903-904,914.

    LYU Fang, ZHANG Gubin, YUAN Qingsong, et al. Evaluation on water-based drilling fluid system for Henan sea-land transition phase shale gas reservoir[J]. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2017, 46(9):903-904,914.
    [17] 李成, 李伟, 张文哲, 等. 延长油田陆相页岩气复杂地层水基钻井液优化及应用[J]. 非常规油气,2023,10(1):130-138.

    LI Cheng, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenzhe, et al. Optimization and application of water-based drilling fluid for complex formation of continental shale gas in Yanchang oilfield[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(1):130-138.
    [18] 谢晓永, 王怡, 颜帮川, 等. 环保型烷基糖苷季铵盐抑制剂制备及作用机制[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2020,44(4):128-134.

    XIE Xiaoyong, WANG Yi, YAN Bangchuan, et al. Synthesis of shale inhibitor of alkyl glycoside quaternary ammonium salt and its action mechanism[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2020, 44(4):128-134.
    [19] LIAO B, WANG J T, SUN J S, et al. Microscopic insights into synergism effect of different hydrate inhibitors on methane hydrate formation: experiments and molecular dynamics simulations[J], Fuel, 340: 127488.
    [20] WANG J T, LIAO B, LIU L, et al. The effect of multi-component Inhibitor systems on hydrate formation[J]. Gas Science and Engineering, 2024, 122:205214. doi: 10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205214
    [21] 卢震, 黄贤斌, 孙金声, 等. 水基钻井液用耐高温纳米聚合物封堵剂的研制[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2020,42(5):587-591.

    LU Zhen, HUANG Xianbin, SUN Jinsheng, et al. Development of the nano-polymer plugging agent with high temperature tolerance for water-based drilling fluid[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(5):587-591.
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(14)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  260
  • HTML全文浏览量:  100
  • PDF下载量:  143
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-04-15
  • 修回日期:  2024-05-20
  • 录用日期:  2024-05-31
  • 刊出日期:  2024-09-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回