留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

CO2腐蚀-应力耦合下固井水泥环密封完整性

武治强 武广瑷 幸雪松

武治强,武广瑷,幸雪松. CO2腐蚀-应力耦合下固井水泥环密封完整性[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2024,41(2):220-230 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.02.012
引用本文: 武治强,武广瑷,幸雪松. CO2腐蚀-应力耦合下固井水泥环密封完整性[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2024,41(2):220-230 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.02.012
WU Zhiqiang, WU Guang’ai, XING Xuesong.Sealing integrity of cement sheath under the condition of CO2 corrosion–stress coupling[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2024, 41(2):220-230 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.02.012
Citation: WU Zhiqiang, WU Guang’ai, XING Xuesong.Sealing integrity of cement sheath under the condition of CO2 corrosion–stress coupling[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2024, 41(2):220-230 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.02.012

CO2腐蚀-应力耦合下固井水泥环密封完整性

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2024.02.012
基金项目: 中海油科技项目“CO2封存与利用钻采关键技术研究”(KJGG-2022-12-CCUS-0104)。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    武治强,博士,主要从事海上钻完井设计、固井与井筒完整性研究。E-mail:wuzhq2@cnooc.com.cn。

  • 中图分类号: TE256

Sealing Integrity of Cement Sheath under the Condition of CO2 Corrosion–Stress Coupling

  • 摘要: CO2地质封存过程中,与地层围岩中的水反应后腐蚀着固井水泥环,腐蚀损伤和套管内压(应力)耦合作用极大地影响着水泥环的密封完整性。基于CO2腐蚀实验,获得不同腐蚀程度水泥石材料力学性能参数,采用混凝土损伤塑性(CDP)本构模型和Mohor-Coulomb准则描述腐蚀前后水泥环的应力-应变行为,利用ABAQUS软件建立考虑CO2腐蚀与应力耦合作用的井筒组合体(套管-水泥环-地层围岩)有限元分析模型,分析和探讨了套管内压和腐蚀时间对水泥环完整性的影响。结果表明,较高套管内压下,井筒水泥环发生弹塑性变形,出现结构损伤,套管与水泥环界面易形成微间隙;受腐蚀和套管内压的耦合作用,水泥环更易于出现完整性失效问题,相比较于未腐蚀水泥环,腐蚀水泥环受压后径向应力、等效塑性应变、微间隙以及拉伸和压缩损伤均较大,与之相反,塑性半径是减小的;微间隙与拉伸和压缩损伤受腐蚀时间的影响不明显。

     

  • 图  1  水泥石单轴拉伸和压缩应力-应变曲线

    图  2  腐蚀水泥石的三轴压缩应力-应变曲线

    图  3  CCUS井井筒的结构组成示意

    图  4  井筒组合体的网格模型

    图  5  不同套管内压下水泥环的应力和等效塑性应变云图

    图  6  不同套管内压下水泥环的径向应力

    图  7  不同套管内压下水泥环的等效塑性应变

    图  8  不同套管内压下水泥环第一界面微间隙

    图  9  不同套管内压下水泥环的拉伸和压缩损伤

    图  10  不同套管内压下腐蚀水泥环等效塑性应变

    图  11  不同套管内压下腐蚀60 d水泥环的径向应力

    图  12  不同套管内压下腐蚀60 d水泥环的等效塑性应变

    图  13  不同套管内压下腐蚀水泥环微间隙的变化

    图  14  不同套管内压下腐蚀水泥环的拉伸和压缩损伤

    表  1  井筒各部分材料的主要特征参数

    材料ρ/
    g·cm−3
    弹性模量/
    MPa
    泊松比C/
    MPa
    $\varphi $/(°)
    套管7.852.1000×1050.290
    地层围岩2.402.6133×1040.2241636
    水泥环(未腐蚀)1.905.8256×1030.159
    腐蚀水
    泥环
    15 d1.901.2851×1040.23610.08015.874
    30 d1.901.1400×1040.2617.63120.200
    60 d1.909.2487×1030.16712.3904.270
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] WASCH L J, KOENEN M, WOLLENWEBER J, et al. Sensitivity of chemical cement alteration- modeling the effect of parameter uncertainty and varying subsurface conditions[J]. Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology, 2015, 5(3):323-338. doi: 10.1002/ghg.1515
    [2] WISEN J, CHESNAUX R, WENDLING G, et al. Assessing the potential of cross-contamination from oil and gas hydraulic fracturing: A case study in northeastern British Columbia, Canada[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 246:275-282.
    [3] WATSON T L, BACHU S. Evaluation of the potential for gas and CO2 leakage along wellbores[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2009, 24(1):115-126.
    [4] WRONA P, RÓŻAŃSKI Z, PACH G, et al. Closed coal mine shaft as a source of carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(15):1139. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-5977-7
    [5] CHOINSKA M, KHELIDJ A, CHATZIGEORGIOU G, et al. Effects and interactions of temperature and stress-level related damage on permeability of concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(1):79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.09.015
    [6] D'ANIELLO A, TÓMASDÓTTIR S, SIGFÚSSON B, et al. Modeling gaseous co2 flow behavior in layered basalts: dimensional analysis and aquifer response[J]. Groundwater, 2021, 59(5):677-693. doi: 10.1111/gwat.13090
    [7] KUTCHKO B G, STRAZISAR B R, DZOMBAK D A, et al. Degradation of well cement by CO2 under geologic sequestration conditions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(13):4787-4792.
    [8] 辜涛. 二氧化碳地质封存条件下固井水泥石腐蚀损伤与防护研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2017.

    GU Tao. Study on degradation of oilwell cement and anticorrosion technology under CO2 geological storage conditions[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
    [9] 杨广国,刘奎,曾夏茂,等. 页岩气井套管内压周期变化对水泥环密封失效的实验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(13):5311-5317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.13.019

    YANG Guangguo, LIU Kui, ZENG Xiamao, et al. Experimental analysis and discussion on cement sheath failure caused by the varied casing internal pressure in shale gas wells[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(13):5311-5317. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.13.019
    [10] 高德利,窦浩宇,董雪林. 二氧化碳注入条件下井筒水泥环完整性若干研究进展[J]. 延安大学学报(自然科学版),2022,41(3):1-9,17.

    GAO Deli, DOU Haoyu, DONG Xuelin. Research progress in wellbore cement sheath integrity under conditions of CO2 injection and storage[J]. Journal of Yanan University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 41(3):1-9,17.
    [11] 陈思宇. 套管内载荷作用下水泥环力学性能分析[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2016.

    CHEN Siyu. Research on cement sheath mechanical properties under the casing internal loading[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2016.
    [12] XI Y, LI J, TAO Q, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of accumulated plastic deformation in cement sheath during multistage fracturing in shale gas wells[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 187:106790. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106790
    [13] 范明涛,李社坤,李军,等. 多级压裂水泥环界面密封失效数值模拟[J]. 科学技术与工程,2019,19(24):107-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.24.017

    FAN Mingtao, LI Shekun, LI Jun, et al. Numerical simulation of interface seal failure of cement sheath during multi-stage fracturing[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(24):107-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.24.017
    [14] 郭辛阳,宋雨媛,步玉环,等. 基于损伤力学变内压条件下水泥环密封完整性模拟[J]. 石油学报,2020,41(11):1425-1433. doi: 10.7623/syxb202011012

    GUO Xinyang, SONG Yuyuan, BU Yuhuan, et al. Simulation of seal integrity of cement sheath under variable internal casing pressure based on damage mechanics[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(11):1425-1433. doi: 10.7623/syxb202011012
    [15] 郭辛阳,步玉环,李强. 变内压条件下膨胀水泥性能对井筒完整性的影响[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2018,35(2):98-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2018.02.016

    GUO Xinyang, BU Yuhuan, LI Qiang. Effects of properties of expansive cement on wellbore integrity under changing casing internal pressure[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2018, 35(2):98-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2018.02.016
    [16] 李早元,郭小阳,韩林,等. 油井水泥石在围压作用下的力学形变行为[J]. 天然气工业,2007,27(9):62-64. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2007.09.019

    LI Zaoyuan, GUO Xiaoyang, HAN Lin, et al. Deformation behavior of oil-well cement stone under confining pressure[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(9):62-64. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2007.09.019
    [17] 韩昌瑞. 有限变形理论及其在岩土工程中的应用[D]. 武汉: 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所, 2009.

    HAN Changrui. The theory of finite deformation and its application in geotechnical engineering[D]. Wuhan: Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2009.
    [18] 张田. 典型混凝土模型在单调和循环荷载下数值模拟应用研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2020.

    ZHANG Tian. Evaluation and application of typical material models used in FE modelling under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2020.
    [19] 曾宇,胡良明. ABAQUS混凝土塑性损伤本构模型参数计算转换及校验[J]. 水电能源科学,2019,37(6):106-109.

    ZENG Yu, HU Liangming. Calculation transformation and calibration of ABAQUS concrete plastic damage constitutive model[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2019, 37(6):106-109.
    [20] 杨同,徐川,王宝学,等. 岩土三轴实验中的粘聚力与内摩擦角[J]. 中国矿业,2007,16(12):104-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2007.12.032

    YANG Tong, XU Chuan, WANG Baoxue, et al. The cohesive strength and the friction angle in rock-soil triaxial rests[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2007, 16(12):104-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2007.12.032
    [21] 刘健. 油气井水泥石力学行为本构方程与完整性评价模型研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2013.

    LIU Jian. Research on constitutive equations and evaluation models of mechanical integrity of cement stone[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University Doctoral Dissertation, 2013.
  • 加载中
图(14) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  275
  • HTML全文浏览量:  86
  • PDF下载量:  42
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-10-14
  • 修回日期:  2023-12-01
  • 刊出日期:  2024-03-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回