留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

浅部地层自由套管外二次置换固井水泥浆体系研究

殷慧 柳华杰 崔洁 张红卫 张洪旭 步玉环 柴德民

殷慧,柳华杰,崔洁,等. 浅部地层自由套管外二次置换固井水泥浆体系研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2023,40(2):216-221 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2023.02.010
引用本文: 殷慧,柳华杰,崔洁,等. 浅部地层自由套管外二次置换固井水泥浆体系研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2023,40(2):216-221 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2023.02.010
YIN Hui, LIU Huajie, CUI Jie, et al.Study on a cement slurry for cementing uncemented shallow section of old casing string by secondary displacement[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2023, 40(2):216-221 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2023.02.010
Citation: YIN Hui, LIU Huajie, CUI Jie, et al.Study on a cement slurry for cementing uncemented shallow section of old casing string by secondary displacement[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2023, 40(2):216-221 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2023.02.010

浅部地层自由套管外二次置换固井水泥浆体系研究

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2023.02.010
基金项目: 国家青年基金“水合物层固井水泥热能存储剂载体研制及承载机理研究”(51804332);国家面上基金“深水油气井固井水泥传质传热过程中浅层水合物稳定机理”(51974355)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    殷慧,在读硕士研究生,2000年生,毕业于中国石油大学(华东)石油工程专业,现就读于中国石油大学(华东)油气井工程专业。电话 13012497313;E-mail:13012497313@139.com

    通讯作者:

    柳华杰,博士,副教授,1986年生,研究方向为油气井固完井工程。E-mail:liuhuajieupc@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TE256.6

Study on a Cement Slurry for Cementing Uncemented Shallow Section of Old Casing String by Secondary Displacement

  • 摘要: 胜利油田经过了二十多年的开发,早期的开发井油层套管水泥面以上的套管腐蚀破坏严重,严重干扰正常生产。为此,拟对浅部地层自由套管段进行二次固井,可在修复套管密封失效的同时防止套管进一步腐蚀。针对环空二次固井注浆施工工艺特点,结合浅部地层松软的特点,在明确浅部地层自由套管外二次固井性能需求的基础上,对水泥浆体系进行开发。通过对胶凝材料体系、低黏触变剂、降失水剂和缓凝剂的研选,构建出一种低密度-低黏度-强触变-长稠化时间的固井水泥浆体系,其配方为:40%G级油井水泥+30%粉煤灰+30%矿渣+(20%~25%)低黏触变剂L-TA+2.5%聚乙烯醇降失水剂+(0.16%~0.32%)氧化锌+1%分散剂+0.5%消泡剂,水固比为0.56,水泥浆密度低至1.5~1.6 g/cm3,黏度小于50 mPa·s,稠化时间大于15 h,平均静切力差值为17.885 N/m2、且触变具有可重复性,满足东部老区浅部地层自由套管外二次固井作业的要求。

     

  • 图  1  球形L-TA外观形貌

    图  2  静切力差值与L-TA加量关系曲线

    图  3  沉降稳定性测试结果

    图  4  稠化性能测试曲线

    表  1  不同加量球形L-TA触变剂水泥浆触变性测试

    L-TA/%φ600φ300φ200φ100φ6φ3φ3'φ3静切力差值/
    N·m−1
    10135109897847394010.511
    151171018375443651157.665
    201098581704133885528.105
    25896156493020553517.885
    30635246432725573216.352
      注:基础配方为40%G级油井水泥+30%矿渣+30%粉煤灰+L-TA,水固比为0.56;φ3'为静置10 min后测得φ3读值
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  降失水剂的降失水性能测试及对水泥浆触变性影响

    降失水剂φ600φ300φ200φ100φ6φ3φ3'静切力差值/
    N·m−1
    FL/
    mL
    0.5% BCG1056546250.5031.53347
    0.5% BXF-200L754129151.0042.04451
    2.5% G60S3718126000049
    2.5% PVA13579563311.0115628.61650
      注:配方为40%G级油井水泥+30%矿渣+30%粉煤灰+20%L-TA,水固比为0.56;φ3'为静置10 min后测得φ3读值
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  缓凝剂的缓凝性能测试及对水泥浆触变性影响

    降失水剂φ600φ300φ200φ100φ6φ3φ3'静切力差值/
    N·m−1
    t稠化/
    h
    2.0%GH-935.017126.01131.533
    1.5% GH-948.0342823.022217538.3257
    0.16%氧化锌76.5595548.035297538.32516
    0.32%氧化锌65.0494538.526236935.259>20
      注:配方为40%G级油井水泥+30%矿渣+30%粉煤灰+20%L-TA+2.5%聚乙烯醇降失水剂,水固比为0.56;φ3'为静置10 min后测得φ3读值
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 付丽霞,马立军,王威,等. 油水井套损原因、检测方法及修复措施[J]. 石油钻探技术,2002,30(4):53-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2002.04.020

    FU Lixia, MA Lijun, WANG Wei, et al. Causes, detection methods and repair measures of oil-water well casing[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2002, 30(4):53-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2002.04.020
    [2] 余雷,薄岷. 辽河油田热采井套损防治新技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2005,32(1):116-118. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2005.01.032

    YU Lei, BO Min. New technology for casing loss prevention and control of thermal wells in Liaohe Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(1):116-118. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2005.01.032
    [3] 李雪. 油水井套损原因分析及预防措施[J]. 化学工程与装备,2017,5:95-96.

    LI Xue. Analysis of causes of casing damage in oil-water wells and preventive measures[J]. Chemical Engineering and Equipment, 2017, 5:95-96.
    [4] 吕建海,滕腾,项绍亮,等. 一种油水井生产套管外冲洗加固用旋转密封井口: 中国, CN208441797U[P]. 2019-01-29.

    LYU Jianhai, TENG Teng, XIANG Shaoliang, et al. Rotary sealing wellhead for external flushing and reinforcement of casing for oil-water well production: CN208441797U[P]. 2019-01-29.
    [5] 邓初首. 粉煤灰在大流动性混凝土中的应用[J]. 粉煤灰,2004,16(3):16-17.

    DENG Chushou. Application of fly ash in high-fluidity concrete[J]. Fly Ash, 2004, 16(3):16-17.
    [6] 高小建,孙博超,叶焕,等. 矿物掺合料对自密实混凝土流变性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版,2016,46(2):439-444.

    GAO Xiaojian, SUN Bochao, YE Huan, et al. Effect of mineral admixtures on rheological properties of self-compacting concrete[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Engineering Science, 2016, 46(2):439-444.
    [7] SY/T 6455—2017, 中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准[S]. 北京: 国家能源局, 2017.

    SY/T 6455—2017, Oil and gas industry standard of the People's Republic of China[S]. Beijing: National Energy Administration, 2017.
    [8] 卢海川,燕平,刘刚,等. 新型油井水泥触变剂的研究与应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2018,35(1):89-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2018.01.017

    LU Haichuan, YAN Ping, LIU Gang, et al. Research and application of new cement thixotropic agent for oil well[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2018, 35(1):89-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2018.01.017
    [9] 黄浩. 粉煤灰混凝土流变性能研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2011.

    HUANG Hao. Study on rheological properties of fly ash concrete[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2011.
    [10] 于永金,刘硕琼,刘丽雯,等. 高温水泥浆降失水剂DRF-120L的制备及评价[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2011,33(3):31-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2011.03.009

    YU Yongjin, LIU Shuoqiong, LIU Liwen, et al. Preparation and evaluation of DRF-120L of high temperature cement slurry water loss reducing agent[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(3):31-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2011.03.009
    [11] 齐志刚,王瑞和,徐依吉,等. 衣康酸/AMPS共聚物作为油井水泥缓凝剂的研究[J]. 北京化工大学学报(自然科学版),2007,34(S2):32-35. doi: 10.13543/j.cnki.bhxbzr.2007.s2.021

    QI Zhigang, WANG Ruihe, XU Yiji, et al. Study on Itaconic acid/AMPS copolymer as a retarder for oil well cement[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2007, 34(S2):32-35. doi: 10.13543/j.cnki.bhxbzr.2007.s2.021
    [12] 陈大钧,余志勇,张颖,等. 适合长封固段的宽温带缓凝剂的研制[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2012,29(1):63-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2012.01.018

    CHEN Dajun, YU Zhiyong, ZHANG Ying, et al. Development of wide temperate band retarder suitable for long sealing and fixing section[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2012, 29(1):63-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2012.01.018
    [13] 郭胜来,步玉环,步万荣,等. 硅酸钠对固井施工安全的影响[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(1):110.

    GUO Shenglai, BU Yuhuan, BU Wanrong, et al. Effect of sodium silicate on cementing construction safety[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 38(1):110.
    [14] 杨惠先,金德银. 高掺量缓凝剂对水泥凝结硬化性能的影响[J]. 石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版),1997,10(1):11-16. doi: 10.13319/j.cnki.sjztddxxbzrb.1997.01.003

    YANG Huixian, JIN Deyin. Effect of high content retarder on coagulation hardening properties of cement[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (Natural Science Edition), 1997, 10(1):11-16. doi: 10.13319/j.cnki.sjztddxxbzrb.1997.01.003
  • 加载中
图(4) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  594
  • HTML全文浏览量:  220
  • PDF下载量:  56
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-18
  • 修回日期:  2202-12-26
  • 刊出日期:  2023-03-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回