留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

顺北碳酸盐岩储层长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力预测方法

李春月 李沁 李德明 吴霞

李春月,李沁,李德明,等. 顺北碳酸盐岩储层长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力预测方法[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2022,39(5):646-653 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.05.017
引用本文: 李春月,李沁,李德明,等. 顺北碳酸盐岩储层长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力预测方法[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2022,39(5):646-653 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.05.017
LI Chunyue, LI Qin, LI Deming, et al.Method of predicting flow conductivity of long-term acid-etched fractures in carbonate reservoirs in shunbei oilfield [J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2022, 39(5):646-653 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.05.017
Citation: LI Chunyue, LI Qin, LI Deming, et al.Method of predicting flow conductivity of long-term acid-etched fractures in carbonate reservoirs in shunbei oilfield [J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2022, 39(5):646-653 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.05.017

顺北碳酸盐岩储层长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力预测方法

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.05.017
基金项目: 中石化科研项目“顺北超深断溶体油藏高效酸压技术研究”(P20064-3)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李春月,工程师,1979年生,硕士,研究方向为油气田开发工程。电话18999831653;E-mail:lichy.xbsj@sinopec.com

    通讯作者:

    李德明,电话 17761200147; E-mail: 2232130321@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: TE357

Method of Predicting Flow Conductivity of Long-Term Acid-Etched Fractures in Carbonate Reservoirs in Shunbei Oilfield

  • 摘要: 顺北碳酸盐岩油气藏温度压力高,储层酸压改造难度大。为解决在闭合应力长期作用下,酸蚀裂缝导流能力损失,导致酸压效果大幅降低的问题。通过酸蚀裂缝导流能力评价实验,研究不同酸液质量分数、温度和闭合时间条件下的酸蚀裂缝导流能力变化规律。综合各条件下酸蚀裂缝导流能力关系式,建立并验证了顺北碳酸盐岩储层长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力预测方法,模拟计算了不同时间和排量下的酸蚀裂缝导流能力变化规律。结果表明:低闭合应力下,酸液反应速率是酸蚀裂缝导流能力主控因素。高闭合应力下,闭合应力、岩石特征和岩面非均匀性是酸蚀裂缝导流能力主控因素。闭合应力是影响岩石表面变形的主控因素,是长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力的决定因素。闭合应力长期作用时裂缝深部导流能力下降幅度比缝口大。人工裂缝中长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力分布规律受酸岩反应速率控制。

     

  • 图  1  不同浓度冻胶酸酸蚀裂缝导流能力

    图  2  不同温度冻胶酸酸蚀裂缝导流能力

    图  3  10 MPa下长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力

    图  4  60 MPa下长期酸蚀裂缝导流能力

    图  5  不同浓度下酸蚀裂缝导流能力与闭合应力关系拟合

    图  6  酸蚀裂缝导流能力拟合参数a与浓度关系

    图  7  酸蚀裂缝导流能力保持率与闭合压力关系

    图  8  不同时间后酸蚀裂缝导流能力对比

    图  9  50 h后酸蚀裂缝长度上导流能力下降幅度

    图  10  不同排量下酸蚀裂缝导流能力对比

    图  11  反应速度常数对酸蚀裂缝导流能力影响规律

    图  12  反应级数对酸蚀裂缝导流能力影响规律

    图  13  A井酸压施工曲线图

    图  14  A井生产曲线图

    表  1  不同浓度酸蚀裂缝导流能力与 闭合压力指数关系式统计表

    酸液浓
    度/%
    不同酸液质量分数下
    酸蚀裂缝导流能力与
    闭合压力指数关系式
    指数关系式ab
    a b
    5 y=186.52e−0.089x 186.52 −0.089
    10 y=237.83e−0.053x 237.83 −0.053
    15 y=614.18e−0.074x 614.18 −0.074
    20 y=984.64e−0.078x 984.64 −0.078
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  酸蚀裂缝导流能力预测值与实验值对比表

    酸液质量
    分数/%
    T/
    闭合压力/
    MPa
    闭合时
    间/h
    酸蚀裂缝导流
    能力/μm2∙cm
    误差率/
    %
    预测值 实验值
    20 130 60 50 13.568 14.736 7.93
    5 130 60 50 0.986 0.895 10.17
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] BEG M S, KUNAK A O, GONG M, et al. A systematic experimental study of acid fracture conductivity[J]. SPE Production & Facilities, 3109:8.1996.
    [2] RUFFET C S, FERY J J, ONAISI A. Acid-fracturing treatment: a surface-topography analysis of acid-etched fractures to determine residual conductivity[J]. SPE Journal, 3817:5.1997.
    [3] MALAGON C, POURNIK M, HILL A D. The texture of acidized fracture surfaces: implications for acid fracture conductivity[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2008, 23(3): 343-352.
    [4] MELENDEZ M G, POURNIK M, ZHU D, et al. The effects of acid contact time and the resulting weakening of the rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity[C]//European Formation Damage Conference. OnePetro, 2007.
    [5] NINO-PENALOZA A, AL-MOMIN A, ZHU D, et al. New insights about acid fracture conductivity at laboratory scale[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro, 2015.
    [6] 陈星宇,杨兆中,李小刚,等. 酸蚀裂缝导流能力实验及预测模型研究综述[J]. 断块油气田,2012,19(5):618-621. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt201205018

    CHEN Xingyu, YANG Zhaozhong, LI Xiaogang, et al. Summary of research on conductivity of acid-etched fractures and prediction models[J]. Fault Block Oil & Gas Field, 2012, 19(5):618-621. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt201205018
    [7] 彭 瑀,李勇明,赵金洲,等. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏酸蚀裂缝导流能力模拟与分析[J]. 石油学报,2015,36(5):606-611,640. doi: 10.7623/syxb201505010

    PENG Yu, LI Yongming, ZHAO Jinzhou, et al. Simulation and analysis of acid-etched fracture conductivity of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(5):606-611,640. doi: 10.7623/syxb201505010
    [8] 钟小军,张锐,吴刚,等. 复杂非均质碳酸盐岩储层酸岩反应动力学特征及酸压对策研究[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2020,37(6):798-802. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.06.021

    ZHONG Xiaojun, ZHANG Rui, WU Gang, et al. Study on dynamic characteristics of acid rock reaction and acid fracturing countermeasures in complex heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(6):798-802. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.06.021
    [9] 吴亚红,吴虎,王明星,等. 基于导流能力评价实验的复合酸化压裂技术[J]. 科学技术与工程,2020,20(31):12776-12781. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.31.014

    WU Yahong, WU Hu, WANG Mingxing, et al. Composite acid fracturing technology based on flow conductivity evaluation experiments[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(31):12776-12781. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.31.014
    [10] 张路锋,牟建业,贺雨南,等. 高温高压碳酸盐岩油藏酸蚀裂缝导流能力实验研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,32(4):93-97.

    ZHANG Lufeng, MOU Jianye, HE Yunan, et al. Experimental study on conductivity of acid-etched fractures in high-temperature and high-pressure carbonate reservoirs[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 32(4):93-97.
    [11] 赵立强,高俞佳,袁学芳,等. 高温碳酸盐岩储层酸蚀裂缝导流能力研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2017,7(1):20-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2017.01.004

    ZHAO Liqiang, GAO Yujia, YUAN Xuefang, et al. Study on the conductivity of acid-etched fractures in high-temperature carbonate reservoirs[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2017, 7(1):20-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2017.01.004
    [12] 刘享,伊向艺,吴元琴,李沁. 酸压裂缝中酸液微观流动数值模拟及分析[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2017,34(4):106-111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.04.020

    LIU Xiang, YI Xiangyi, WU Yuanqin, et al. Numerical simulation and analysis of acid flow in acid fractures[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2017, 34(4):106-111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2017.04.020
    [13] 宋巍. ZG8-43井区鹰山组储层酸蚀裂缝导流能力影响因素研究[D]. 西南石油大学, 2016.

    SONG Wei. Research on influencing factors of conductivity of acid-etched fractures of Yingshan Formation reservoir in ZG8-43 well area[D]. Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
    [14] 王玉芳,杜建军,牛新年,等. 碳酸盐岩酸压裂缝导流能力随缝长变化规律研究[J]. 地质力学学报,2015,21(4):546-554. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2015.04.010

    WANG Yufang, DU Jianjun, NIU Xinnian, et al. Study on the variation of conductivity of acid-fractured fractures in carbonate rocks with fracture length[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2015, 21(4):546-554. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2015.04.010
    [15] 岳迎春,郭建春,冯松,等. 酸蚀裂缝导流能力数值模型研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版),2015,12(20):55-59. doi: 10.16772/j.cnki.1673-1409.2015.20.014

    YUE Yingchun, GUO Jianchun, FENG Song, et al. Numerical model research on conductivity of acid-etched fractures[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 12(20):55-59. doi: 10.16772/j.cnki.1673-1409.2015.20.014
    [16] 吴霞,伊向艺,黄文强,等. 酸蚀裂缝差异化刻蚀量化研究及影响因素探讨[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2019,36(198):250-256.

    WU Xia, YI Xiangyi, HUANG Wenqiang, et al. Discussion on the Quantitative Study and lmpact Factors of Differentialized Corrosion in Fractures Generated by Acid Corrosion[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(198):250-256.
    [17] 顾亚鹏,伊向艺,戴亚婷,等. 酸岩反应有效作用距离确定新方法探讨[J]. 科学技术与工程,2015,15(27):34-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.27.006

    GU Yapeng, YI Xiangyi, DAI Yating, et al. Discussion on a new method for determining the effective distance of acid rock reaction[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(27):34-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.27.006
    [18] 李沁. 高黏度酸液酸岩反应动力学行为研究[D]. 成都理工大学, 2013.

    LI Qin. Study on the reaction kinetics of high-viscosity acid liquid and acid rock[D]. Chengdu University of Technology, 2013.
  • 加载中
图(14) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  967
  • HTML全文浏览量:  219
  • PDF下载量:  27
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-04-15
  • 修回日期:  2022-05-11
  • 录用日期:  2022-06-06
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回