留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

满深区块深井强封堵钻井液技术

喻化民,  薛莉,  吴红玲,  李海彪,  冯丹,  杨冀平,  鲁娜

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 钻井液与完井液  > 2022 >  39(2): 171-179
喻化民，薛莉，吴红玲，等. 满深区块深井强封堵钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液，2022，39（2）：171-179 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.02.007
引用本文: 喻化民，薛莉，吴红玲，等. 满深区块深井强封堵钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液，2022，39（2）：171-179 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.02.007
shu
YU Huamin, XUE Li, WU Hongling, et al.Drilling fluid with superior plugging performance used in deep well drilling in manshen block[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid，2022, 39（2）：171-179 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.02.007
Citation: YU Huamin, XUE Li, WU Hongling, et al.Drilling fluid with superior plugging performance used in deep well drilling in manshen block[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid，2022, 39（2）：171-179 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.02.007
shu

满深区块深井强封堵钻井液技术

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2022.02.007
  • 1.

    中国石油集团渤海钻探工程技术研究院, 河北任丘 062550

  • 2.

    中国石油集团华北油田分公司第三采油厂, 河北河间062450

基金项目: 中石油渤海钻探工程技术研究院科技项目“塔河地区深井强封堵钻井液技术研究与应用”（2021Y21K）
详细信息
    作者简介:

    喻化民，高级工程师，1981年生，2005年毕业于长江大学应用化学专业，现在从事钻井液技术研究与应用工作。E-mail：93331573@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: TE254.4

Drilling Fluid with Superior Plugging Performance Used in Deep Well Drilling in Manshen Block

  • 1.

    Engineering Technology Research Institute, CNPC Bohai Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Renqiu, Hebei 062550

  • 2.

    The Third Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Hejian , Hebei 062450

    摘要
  • 摘要: 满深区块中深部地层断裂破碎，微裂缝发育，且黏土矿物含量高，组分差异大，硬脆性和水敏性泥页岩相互共存，钻井过程中易发生水力劈裂和水化不等速膨胀而导致的井壁失稳。为此，提出了“物理支撑+化学抑制封堵”防塌技术对策，并构建了多元协同防塌强封堵钻井液。室内评价表明：强封堵钻井液抗温达180 ℃；抗10%饱和盐水污染；T层和S层岩样滚动回收率高达89.36%和91.33%、膨胀率低至7.3%和4.2%；能有效封堵20～120目不同粒径石英砂间微孔隙。该钻井液在ManS5-H4井现场应用中性能稳定，流变性好，滤失量低，具有较好的抑制和防塌性能，解决了中深部地层阻卡、坍塌掉块和扩径等井壁失稳问题，井眼通畅规则，二、三开井段平均井径扩大率分别为4.28%和6.75%，返出岩屑代表性好，无钻井液事故发生，能满足复杂地层复杂工艺钻进需要，提高了钻井综合效益。

     

    Abstract: The deep formations drilled in the Manshen block are broken and full of microfractures. They have high clay contents with large differences in clay composition. Hard and brittle shales and water-sensitive shales are coexisting in the formations drilled. These formations easily lose their stability during drilling because of hydraulic splitting and difference in the speed of hydration. A technical measure named “physical support plus chemical inhibition and plugging” was presented and an anti-collapse drilling fluid with superior plugging capacity formulated to deal with the borehole wall instability problem. Laboratory study showed that the drilling fluid functioned normally at 180 ℃ and was able to resist contamination by 10% saltwater. Shale samples taken from the T layer and S layer were tested in the drilling fluid formulated. Hot rolling test gave percent cuttings recovery of 89.36% and 91.33% respectively, and expansion test gave rate of expansion of 7.3% and 4.2% respectively. This drilling fluid can plug the pores in cores made with quartz particles from 20 mesh to 120 mesh. In drilling the well ManS5-H4, the drilling fluid showed stable properties and had low filtration rate. It had good inhibitive capacity and collapse prevention performance. Tripping was smooth with no overpulls and resistance, the second and the third interval found average hole enlargement of 4.28% and 6.75% respectively. The cuttings returned to the shake shakers kept their original shakes and no downhole troubles were ever encountered. This drilling fluid has satisfied the needs of drilling the complex formations and saved the total cost of drilling.

     

    • HTML全文

  • 图  1  强封堵钻井液抑制性评价实验结果对比图

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  2  ManS5-H4实钻钻井液性能

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图  3  ManS5-H4井井径扩大率

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    表  1  满深区块各层段黏土矿物组分平均相对含量

    层
    位    		样品数
    （个）    		黏土矿物组份相对含量/%混层比/%
    IKCI/SC/SI/S混层C/S混层
    J815.6065.9011.407.10　25　
    T77.806.307.3078.60　75～100　
    P上413.8013.0014.0059.20　65～85　
    P下513.607.806.2061.401150～65　
    C上638.805.709.7045.80　50～80　
    C下516.6054.408.8020.20　15～25　
    D上1922.167.268.4262.16　20～70　
    D下818.257.6253.7520.38　15～30　
    S上1240.756.5815.2537.42　20　
    S中627.6710.5014.3020.2027.332020～30
    S下1420.282.5745.7131.44　20　
    O2344.489.2622.5223.74　20　
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  KCl加量对钻井液性能的影响

    KCl/
    %    		实验条件回收率/
    %    		ρ/
    g·cm−3    		PV/
    mPa∙s    		YP/
    Pa    		Gel/
    Pa/Pa    		FLAPI/
    mL
    0常温80.601.302018.56.0/9.56.8
    80 ℃×16 h1.302221.06.5/11.56.0
    1常温87.601.321519.05.5/6.58.0
    80 ℃×16 h1.321821.05.5/6.56.8
    3常温89.061.321517.04.5/5.58.3
    80 ℃×16 h1.321817.54.5/5.57.4
    5常温94.061.321517.04.0/5.08.6
    80 ℃×16 h1.321717.53.5/4.57.8
    7常温95.801.321516.03.5/5.09.0
    80 ℃×16 h1.321717.03.0/4.58.2
    10常温93.841.321516.03.5/4.510.4
    80 ℃×16 h1.321816.03.0/4.59.6
    　注：配方：3%膨润土+0.3%Na2CO3+0.1%NaOH+0.6%
    IND30+0.5%NH4-HPAN-2+0.5%THJN+加重剂；pH值为9
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  在基浆中加入不同防塌剂的性能（150 ℃、16 h）

    防塌剂PV/
    mPa·s    		YP/
    Pa    		Gel/
    Pa/Pa    		FLAPI/
    mL    		FLHTHP/mL
    120 ℃150 ℃
    051.51.0/3.012.020.025.0
    2%SY-A0163.02.0/4.07.014.818.5
    2%FT34281.50.5/1.57.816.421.0
    3% DYFT-285.01.5/5.04.413.617.0
    2%FT10361.00.5/2.57.617.626.0
    3%FT-160.50.5/2.08.918.019.2
    3%FT-1A103.51.5/3.54.814.217.6
    3%RLQ-282.00.5/3.07.215.519.0
    2%YX52.01.5/4.010.816.824.2
    　注：基浆为：5%膨润土浆+5%SMP-3+5%SPNH+7%KCl+
    0.2%NaOH
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  封堵防塌剂优选复配性能评价实验（150 ℃、16 h）

    防塌剂PV/mPa·sYP/PaGel/(Pa/Pa)FLAPI/mLFLHTHP/mL
    051.51.0/3.012.025.0
    2%DYFT-2+2%FT-1A92.52.5/5.06.817.2
    2%DYFT-2+2%FT-1A +2%SYA01102.52.5/6.55.515.6
    2%DYFT-2+2%FT-1A +2%YX94.52.5/6.54.014.8
    2%DYFT-2+2%FT-1A+2%YX+2%SQD-98(细)125.03.0/8.03.213.2
    2%DYFT-2+2%FT-1A+2%YX+2%DF-195.03.0/7.03.614.2
    　注：FLHTHP在150 ℃测定
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  降滤失剂优选性能评价实验（150 ℃、16 h）

    降滤失剂PV/mPa·sYP/PaGel/(Pa/Pa)FLAPI/mLFLHTHP/mL
    094.02.0/6.04.515.2
    0.3%CMC-LV156.01.5/7.02.814.6
    0.5%XCD-LV153.54.5/7.512.422.0
    0.3%PAC-LV217.01.5/9.02.213.8
    0.5%Redul185.01.0/8.52.314.0
    0.3%PAC-LV+0.5%Redul3116.02.0/11.01.88.6
    0.3%PAC-LV+2%KJAN2212.02.5/10.03.010.4
    0.3%PAC-LV+0.5%NH4-HPAN-2268.51.5/10.52.812.4
    0.3%PAC-LV+2%JNF-3185.01.5/8.52.09.2
    0.3%PAC-LV+2%TYJS-1165.01.5/6.52.49.8
    　注：基浆配方：5%膨润土浆+0.4%NaOH +3%SMP-3+3%SPNH +7%KCl +2% DYFT-2 +2%FT-1A +2%YX+2%润滑剂；钻井液密度为1.36 g/cm3；FLHTHP在150 ℃测定
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  强封堵钻井液抗温性能评价实验

    测试
    条件    		PV/
    mPa·s    		YP/
    Pa    		Gel/
    Pa/Pa    		FLAPI/
    mL    		FLHTHP/
    mL    		pH
    老化前206.02.5/11.03.29
    150 ℃、16 h185.03.0/9.02.89.69
    150 ℃、24 h185.02.5/9.02.89.89
    150 ℃、48 h174.02.0/7.03.010.69
    180 ℃、16 h162.51.5/5.54.514.29
    　注：钻井液密度为1.36 g/cm3；FLHTHP在150 ℃测定
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  强封堵钻井液钻井液砂床封堵性评价实验

    砂床粒径/目砂床高度/cmP/MPat/min侵入深度/cm
    20～40 30 0.7 480 4.9
    40～80 30 0.7 480 4.2
    80～100 30 0.7 480 3.4
    100～120 30 0.7 480 2.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  8  在强封堵钻井液中加入饱和盐水的抗盐水污染性能

    饱和盐水/
    %    		ρ/
    g·cm−3    		PV/
    mPa·s    		YP/
    Pa    		Gel/
    Pa/Pa    		FLAPI/
    mL    		FLHTHP/
    mL    		pH
    01.36185.03.0/9.02.89.59.0
    51.35175.03.0/8.03.011.89.0
    101.33143.52.0/5.53.814.68.5
    151.28123.01.0/3.05.219.88.0
    201.25111.00.5/1.05.822.48.0
    下载: 导出CSV
    • 参考文献(18)
  • [1] 杨海军,邓兴梁,张银涛,等. 塔里木盆地满深1井奥陶系超深断控碳酸盐岩油气藏勘探重大发现及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探,2020,25(3):13-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.03.002

    YANG Haijun, DENG Xingliang, ZHANG Yintao, et al. Great discovery and its significance of exploration for ordovician ultra-deep fault-controlled carbonate reservoirs of well Manshen 1 in Tarim basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3):13-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.03.002
    [2] 袁国栋, 王鸿远, 陈宗琦, 等. 塔里木盆地满深1井超深井钻井关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2020, 48(4): 21-27.

    YUAN Guodong, WANG Hongyuan, CHEN Zongqi, et al. Key drilling technologies for the ultra-deep well Manshen 1 in the Tarim basin[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(4): 21-27.
    [3] 吴柏志, 张怀兵. 满深1井碳酸盐岩地层自愈合水泥浆固井技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(1): 67-73

    WU Bozhi, ZHANG Huaibing.Self-healing cementing technology in carbonate formation of Manshen 1 well[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(1): 67-73
    [4] 翟科军,于洋,刘景涛,等. 顺北油气田火成岩侵入体覆盖区超深井优快钻井技术[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(2):1-5. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020004

    ZHAI Kejun, YU Yang, LIU Jingtao, et al. Ultra-deep well drilling technology in the igneous invasion coverage area of the Shunbei oil and gas field[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(2):1-5. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020004
    [5] 林永学, 王伟吉, 金军斌. 顺北油气田鹰1井超深井段钻井液关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2019, 47(3): 113-120.

    LIN Yongxue, WANG Weiji, JIN Junbin. Key drilling fluid technology in the ultra deep section of well Ying-1 in the Shunbei oil and gas field[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2019, 47(3): 113-120.
    [6] 董小虎,李银婷. 塔里木盆地顺北区块二叠系井漏复杂的分析及对策[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程),2020,47(2):59-62.

    DONG Xiaohu, LI Yinting. Analysis and countermeasures for complex Permian well leakage in the Shunbei block of Tarim basin[J]. Exploration Engineering ( Rock & Soil Drilling and Tunneling), 2020, 47(2):59-62.
    [7] 于得水,徐泓,吴俢振,等. 满深1井奥陶系桑塔木组高性能防塌水基钻井液技术[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(5):49-54. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020070

    YU Deshui, XU Hong, WU Xiuzhen, et al. High performance anti-collapse water-base drilling fluid technology of ordovician Santamu formation in well Manshen1[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(5):49-54. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020070
    [8] 邱春阳,张翔宇,赵红香,等. 顺北区块深层井壁稳定钻井液技术[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2021,44(2):81-86.

    QIU Chunyang, ZHANG Xiangyu, ZHAO Hongxiang, et al. Drilling-fluid system for deep borehole stability in Shunbei block, Tarim basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44(2):81-86.
    [9] 李成,白杨,于洋,等. 顺北油田破碎地层井壁稳定钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2020,37(1):15-22.

    LI Cheng, BAI Yang, YU Yang, et al. Study and application of drilling fluid technology for stabilizing fractured formations in Shunbei oilfield[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(1):15-22.
    [10] 陈修平,李双贵,于洋,等. 顺北油气田碳酸盐岩破碎性地层防塌钻井液技术[J]. 石油钻探技术,2020,48(2):12-16. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020005

    CHEN Xiuping,LI Shuanggui,YU Yang, et al. Anti-collapse drilling fluid technology for broken carbonate formation in Shunbei oil and gas field[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(2):12-16. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2020005
    [11] 金军斌. 塔里木盆地顺北区块超深井火成岩钻井液技术[J]. 石油钻探技术,2016,44(6):17-23.

    JIN Junbin. Drilling fluid technology for igneous rocks in ultra-deep wells in the Shunbei area, Tarim basin[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(6):17-23.
    [12] 谢俊, 司西强, 赵虎, 等. 顺北深井磺化钻井液起泡原因及解决思路[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2019, 20(6): 1-6.

    XIE Jun, SI Xiqiang, ZHAO Hu, et al. Discussion on causes of sulfonated drilling fluid foaming and solution to this problem in deep wells of Shunbei oilfield[J]. Advances in Fine Petrochemicals, 2019, 20(6): 1-6.
    [13] 吴雄军,林永学,宋碧涛,等. 顺北油气田奥陶系破碎性地层油基钻井液技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2020,37(6):701-708. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.06.004

    WU Xiongjun, LIN Yongxue, SONG Bitao, et al. Oil base drilling fluid technology for drilling broken ordovician formation in Shunbei block[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(6):701-708. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.06.004
    [14] 黄维安,牛晓,沈青云,等. 塔河油田深侧钻井防塌钻井液技术[J]. 石油钻探技术,2016,44(2):51-57. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201602009

    HUANG Weian, NIU Xiao, SHEN Qingyun, et al. Anti-sloughing dring fluid technology for deep sidetracking wells in the Tahe oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(2):51-57. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201602009
    [15] 胡广强,白彬珍,柯珂. 顺北区块辉绿岩井段井壁稳定性分析[J]. 中国海上油气,2017,29(5):119-125.

    HU Guangqiang, BAI Binzhen, KE Ke. Analysis on borehole instability mechanism of diabase in Shunbei block[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(5):119-125.
    [16] 程善平,鄢家宇,曹鹏,等. 塔里木泛哈拉哈塘桑塔木组硬脆性泥岩井壁失稳机理及对策[J]. 钻采工艺,2018,41(5):23-25. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2018.05.07

    CHENG Shanping, YAN Jiayu, CAO Peng, et al. study on instability mechanism of hardbrittle mudstone borehole wall at sangtamu group in halahatang block of tarim oilfield and countermeasures[J]. drilling & production technology, 2018, 41(5):23-25. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2018.05.07
    [17] 刘锋报,邵海波,周志世,等. 哈拉哈塘油田硬脆性泥页岩井壁失稳机理及对策[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2015,32(1):38-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2015.01.10

    LIU Fengbao, SHAO Haibo, ZHOU Zhishi, et al. Mechanism and strategy to deal with borehole instability of hard and brittle shales in Halahatang oilfield.[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2015, 32(1):38-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2015.01.10
    [18] 范胜,宋碧涛,陈曾伟,等. 顺北5-8井志留系破裂性地层提高承压能力技术[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2019,36(4):431-436. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.006

    FAN Sheng, SONG Bitao, CHEN Zengwei, et al. Technology for enhancing pressure bearing capacity of fractured silurian system in well Shunbei 5-8[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(4):431-436. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.006
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
图(3) / 表(8)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  944
  • HTML全文浏览量:  384
  • PDF下载量:  106
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-10-26
  • 修回日期:  2021-11-21
  • 录用日期:  2021-10-21
  • 刊出日期:  2022-06-23

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    网站版权所有 《钻井液与完井液》津ICP备13002319号-1

    地址：河北省任丘市燕山南道渤海钻探工程院《钻井液与完井液》编辑部邮政编码：062552

    电话：（0317）2725487　2722354Email：zjyywjy@126.com

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计