留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

自修复油井水泥石力学性能与微观结构

刘仍光

刘仍光. 自修复油井水泥石力学性能与微观结构[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2021,38(4):486-491 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2021.04.014
引用本文: 刘仍光. 自修复油井水泥石力学性能与微观结构[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2021,38(4):486-491 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2021.04.014
LIU Rengguang.Mechanical properties and microstructure of self-healing oil well cement[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2021, 38(4):486-491 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2021.04.014
Citation: LIU Rengguang.Mechanical properties and microstructure of self-healing oil well cement[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2021, 38(4):486-491 doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2021.04.014

自修复油井水泥石力学性能与微观结构

doi: 10.12358/j.issn.1001-5620.2021.04.014
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金项目"海相深层高温高压钻完井工程基础理论及控制方法"(U19B6003-05)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘仍光,副研究员,博士,现从事固井水泥浆性能研究。电话 (010)56606220;E-mail:jiangonglrg@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TE256.6

Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Self-healing Oil Well Cement

  • 摘要: 关于自修复剂掺入水泥浆后对水泥石力学性能及微观结构的影响研究较少。自修复乳液掺量分别为0%、5%、10%、15%和20%,液固比均为0.44,各水泥浆试样在90 ℃水浴中养护3 d。结果表明,自修复乳液的掺入,降低了水泥石的弹性模量,随掺量的增加,水泥石的弹性模量降低较显著;自修复水泥石的强度高于普通水泥石,掺量较小时抗压强度更高,掺量较大时,抗折强度增幅更大。自修复乳液改变了水泥水化产物Ca(OH)2晶体的微观形貌,使其不再呈叠片状堆积,而是乱向、松散分布且晶体形貌不规则,自修复胶粒沉淀分布于水化产物凝胶网络结构之间。自修复乳液降低了水泥石的孔隙率,增加了水泥石的平均孔径和最可几孔径。

     

  • 图  1  自修复乳液不同掺量下水泥石的弹性模量

    图  2  自修复乳液不同掺量下水泥石的抗折强度

    图  3  自修复乳液不同掺量下水泥石的抗压强度

    图  4  普通水泥石的微观形貌

    图  5  自修复水泥石C5试样微观形貌

    图  6  自修复水泥石C10试样微观形貌

    图  7  自修复水泥石C15试样的微观形貌

    图  8  自修复水泥石C20试样的微观形貌

    图  9  自修复水泥石孔隙率和平均孔径

    图  10  自修复水泥石孔隙分布

    表  1  自修复乳液水泥浆配方的配比

    编号油井水泥/%水/%自修复乳液/%消泡剂/%液固比/%
    C01004400.144
    C51003950.244
    C1010034100.344
    C1510029150.444
    C2010024200.544
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 张林海,刘仍光,周仕明,等. 模拟压裂作用对水泥环密封性破坏及改善研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2017,17(13):168-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.13.031

    ZHANG Linhai, LIURengguang, ZHOU Shiming, et al. Investigation on sealing failure and improving of cement sheath under simulated staged fracturing[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(13):168-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2017.13.031
    [2] ZHOU Shiming, LIU Rengguang, ZENG Hao, et al. Mechanical characteristics of well cement under cyclic loading and its influence on the integrity of shale gas wellbores[J]. Fuel, 2019, 250:132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.131
    [3] 范明涛,李社坤,李军,陈晓欣. 多级压裂水泥环界面密封失效数值模拟[J]. 科学技术与工程,2019,19(24):107-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.24.017

    FAN Mingtao, LI Shekun, LI Jun, et al. Numerical simulation of interface seal failure of cement sheath during multi-stage[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(24):107-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2019.24.017
    [4] 周浪,曾青松,汪传磊,等. 地下储气库注采井不同井段水泥环密封性能实验[J]. 天然气工业,2020,40(5):104-108.

    ZHOU Lang, ZENG Qingsong, WANG Chuanlei, et al. An experimental study on the sealing performance of cement sheath in different sections of injection production wells of an underground gas storage[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(5):104-108.
    [5] 唐毅. 储气库注采载荷对储层段水泥环完整性的影响研究[D]. 西南石油大学, 2017.

    TANG Yi. Study on the effect of loading pressure on the integrity of cement sheath in gas storage[D]. Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
    [6] 武治强,刘书杰,耿亚楠,等. 高温高压高含硫气井固井水泥环封隔能力评价技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2016,38(6):787-790.

    WU Zhiqiang, LIU Shujie, GENGYanan, et al. Evaluation technology for isolation capacity of cement sheath in HTHP high-sulfur gas wells[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2016, 38(6):787-790.
    [7] 郑友志,佘朝毅,姚坤全,等. 川渝地区含硫气井固井水泥环界面腐蚀机理分析[J]. 天然气工业,2011,31(12):85-131. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.12.015

    ZHENG Youzhi, SHE Chaoyi, YAO Kunquan, et al. Corrosion mechanism analysis of cement sheath interfaces of sour gas wells in Sichuan and Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(12):85-131. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.12.015
    [8] 辛海鹏,吴达华,张明辉,等. 固井用防水窜自愈合剂的探索[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2020,37(2):221-225. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.02.015

    XINHaipeng, WU Dahua, ZHANG Minghui, et al. Explore and Study on Well Cementing Anti-Water-Channeling Self-Healing Agent[J]. Drilling Fluid and Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(2):221-225. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.02.015
    [9] 孙晓杰,余纲,瞿志浩,等. 自愈合水泥在塔里木油田碎屑岩固井中的应用[J]. 天然气与石油,2017,35(4):63-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5539.2017.04.011

    SUN Xiaojie, YU Gang, QQ Zhihao, et al. The Application of self-Healing cement in Tarim clastic rock well[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 35(4):63-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5539.2017.04.011
    [10] 万浩东,杨远光,邓天安,等. 适用于储气库固井自愈合水泥浆体系[J]. 油田化学,2019,36(1):53-57, 89.

    WAN Haodong, YANG Zhiguang, DENG Tianan, et al. A selfhealing cement slurry system for gas storage cementing[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2019, 36(1):53-57, 89.
    [11] 郭丽梅,耿国伟,霍丙夏. 新型自愈合水泥研制[J]. 钻井液与完井液,2014,31(6):55-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2014.06.015

    GUO Limei, GENG Guowei, HUO Bingxia. Development of New Self-Healing Cement[J]. Drilling Fluid and Completion Fluid, 2014, 31(6):55-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2014.06.015
    [12] LU Zicheng, KONG Xiangming, YANG Ruifang, et al. Oil swellable polymer modified cement paste: Expansion and crack healing upon oil absorption[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 114:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.163
    [13] IRENE K, EVANGELIAK K, ANNA K, et al. Effect of submicron admixtures on mechanical and self-healing properties of cement-based composites[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2019, 42(7):1494-1509.
    [14] METHA P K, MONTEIRO P J M. Concrete: microstructure, properties and materials[M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 2005.
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  517
  • HTML全文浏览量:  250
  • PDF下载量:  31
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-04-15
  • 刊出日期:  2021-07-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回