留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

昭通页岩气示范区井漏防治技术与实践

张志磊,  胡百中,  卞维坤,  冯杰,  郝惠军,  杨峥

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 钻井液与完井液  > 2020 >  37(1): 38-45
张志磊, 胡百中, 卞维坤, 冯杰, 郝惠军, 杨峥. 昭通页岩气示范区井漏防治技术与实践[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2020, 37(1): 38-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.01.006
引用本文: 张志磊, 胡百中, 卞维坤, 冯杰, 郝惠军, 杨峥. 昭通页岩气示范区井漏防治技术与实践[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2020, 37(1): 38-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.01.006
shu
ZHANG Zhilei, HU Baizhong, BIAN Weikun, FENG Jie, HAO Huijun, YANG Zheng. Mud Loss Control Techniques and Practices in Zhaotong Demonstration Zone of Shale Gas Drilling[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2020, 37(1): 38-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.01.006
Citation: ZHANG Zhilei, HU Baizhong, BIAN Weikun, FENG Jie, HAO Huijun, YANG Zheng. Mud Loss Control Techniques and Practices in Zhaotong Demonstration Zone of Shale Gas Drilling[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2020, 37(1): 38-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.01.006
shu

昭通页岩气示范区井漏防治技术与实践

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2020.01.006

  • 1. 中国石油集团工程技术研究院有限公司, 北京 102206;

  • 2. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司浙江油田分公司, 杭州 310023;

  • 3. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司浙江油田分公司天然气勘探开发事业部, 四川泸州 646400

基金项目: 

国家科技重大专项课题“山地页岩气井优快钻完井技术现场试验与应用”（2017ZX05063-003）；中国石油集团公司科技项目专题“裂缝性恶性漏失新型堵漏材料研发及工艺技术研究”（2018D-5009-05）；浙江油田科技项目“昭通页岩气钻井防漏堵漏机理研究及新型堵漏剂现场先导试验”（2018-428）

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张志磊,高级工程师,博士,1982年生,毕业于中国地质大学(北京)岩石矿物材料学专业,现在从事钻井液技术研究工作。电话 (010)80162083;E-mail:zhangzhidr@cnpc.com.cn

    通讯作者:

    杨峥,电话 (010)80162089

  • 中图分类号: TE282

Mud Loss Control Techniques and Practices in Zhaotong Demonstration Zone of Shale Gas Drilling

  • 1. CNPC Engineering Technology R&D Company Limited, Beijing 102206;

  • 2. PetroChina Zhejiang Oilfield Company, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310023;

  • 3. Zhejiang Oilfield Company Exploration&Development Department, Luzhou Sichuan 646400

    摘要
  • 摘要: 昭通页岩气示范区是我国页岩气勘探开发的重要有利区。受地面和地下条件的综合影响，作业区施工过程中存在着较为普遍的井漏情况，总体呈现了浅表层漏失、中深部直井段漏失和水平段漏失的“三段式”井漏特征。针对井漏风险预测难度大、高密度钻井液漏失严重等问题，浙江油田公司开展了孔隙压力和天然裂缝稳定性预测、水平段低密度钻井液防漏、可变形凝胶复合堵漏等技术措施的攻关。通过不同平台实钻情况的观察，验证了三维地质力学模型对于中深部裂缝性地层可能发生的井漏风险具有良好的预测能力。低密度防漏措施和可变形凝胶复合堵漏技术在YS112、YS131等多个井区进行了试验，通过合理降低钻井液密度、提升堵漏材料对微裂缝的可变形封堵能力，对水平段井漏起到了良好的预防和堵漏效果。结合昭通页岩气示范区地质条件特征，在井漏情况统计分析的基础上，对当前主要的井漏防治技术措施及相关工程实践进行了梳理和分析讨论，为示范区井漏防治技术的一体化发展提供了参考借鉴。

     

    Abstract: The Zhaotong Demonstration Zone of shale gas drilling is an important area favorable to shale gas exploration and development. Affected by the surface and underground conditions, mud losses have generally been encountered during drilling operations. Mud losses generally occurred in the shallow section, the medium-deep (vertical)section and the horizontal section. The mud losses were difficult to predict and become more severe with mud density. PetroChina Zhejiang Oilfield Company started studies on several topics such as predict of pore pressure and stability of natural fractures, prevention of low-density mud losses in horizontal section and mud loss control with deformable gel lost circulation materials (LCM). It was found through observation of drilling practice on several drilling platforms that a 3D geo-mechanical model can be used to predict the potential mud losses in medium-deep fractured formations. Technologies for preventing low-density mud losses and the deformable LCM have been tried on the well YS112 and the well YS131. By reducing the mud density to a reasonable level and enhancing the capacity of controlling mud losses with the deformable LCM, mud losses in horizontal drilling were successfully prevented from occurring. This paper, based on the statistical analyses of the mud looses encountered in previous drilling operations, discusses the current technologies for and practice of mud losses control, taking into account the geological characteristics of the Zhaotong demonstration zone of shale gas drilling. The technologies discussed in this paper can be used as references to the prevention of mud loss control in the demonstration zone.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(24)
  • [1] 江青春,胡素云,王泽成,等.四川盆地茅口组风化壳岩溶古地貌及及勘探选区[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(6):949-960.

    JIANG Qingchun, HU Suyun, WANG Zecheng, et al. Paleokarst landform of the weathering crust of middle permian Maokou formation in Sichuan basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(6):949-960.
    [2] 王海真,池英柳,赵宗举,等.四川盆地栖霞组岩溶储层及勘探选区[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(5):833-842.

    WANG Haizhen, CHI Yingliu, ZHAO Zongju, et al. Karst reservoirs developed in the middle permian Qixia formation of Sichuan basin and selection of exploration regions[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(5):833-842.
    [3] British Standards Institution. BS 5930 Code of practice for site investigations[S]. British Standards Institution, 1999.
    [4] ASTMD6429-99 American society for testing and materials. Standard guide for selecting surface geophysical methods[S]. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, 1999.
    [5] 蔡前飞,费利东,张建,等.岩溶勘查技术及评价[J].四川建材, 2011, 37(6):50-51.

    CAI Qianfei, FEI Lidong, ZHANG Jian, et al. Karst exploration technology and evaluation[J]. Sichuan Building Materials, 2011, 37(6):50-51.
    [6] 梁源珠,叶臻,李杨,等.高密度电法在岩溶地区勘察中的应用[J].资源环境与工程, 2018, 32(2):307-309.

    LIANG Yuanzhu, YE Zhen, LI Yang, et al. Application of high density resistivity method in Karst area investigation[J]. Resources Environment&Engineering, 2018, 32(2):307-309.
    [7] XIE JUN, QIU KAIBIN, ZHONG BING, et al. Construction of a 3D geomechanical model for development of a shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan basin[R]. SPE 187828, 2018.
    [8] WANG Gaocheng, ZHAO Chunduan, LIANG Xing, et al. Integrating qualitative and quantitative drilling risk prediction methods for shale gas field in Sichuan basin[R]. IPTC 19487, 2019.
    [9] GLENN L BOWERS. Pore pressure estimation from velocity data:Accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides undercompaction[R]. SPE 27488, 1995.
    [10] MARK WILLIAM ALBERTY, KRISTI FINK. Using connection and total gases quantitatively in the assessment of shale pore pressure[R]. SPE 166188, 2013.
    [11] 李宪飞.川南页岩气示范区气体钻井适用性评价及应用研究[D].黑龙江大庆:东北石油大学, 2017. LI Xianfei. Applicability evaluation and application of gas drilling in the demonstration area of shale gas in southern Sichuan[D]. Heilongjiang Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University, 2017.
    [12] 邓虎,李功玉,肖洲,等.基于充气钻井的川东地区防漏治漏技术研究与应用[J].钻采工艺, 2011, 34(5):22-24.

    DENG Hu, LI Gongyu, XIAO Zhou, et al. Research and application of leak resistance and sealing technology in east Sichuan region based on aerated drilling[J]. Drilling&Production Technology, 2011, 34(5):22-24.
    [13] 赵启于,董红梅,段敏.充气钻井治理恶性井漏技术与应用[J].钻采工艺, 2014, 37(3):107-108.

    ZHAO Qiyu, DONG Hongmei, DUAN Min. Technology and application of aerated drilling to control malignant circulation loss[J]. Drilling&Production Technology, 2014, 37(3):107-108.
    [14] 潘军,李大奇.顺北油田二叠系火成岩防漏堵漏技术[J].钻井液与完井液, 2018, 35(3):42-47.

    PAN Jun, LI Daqi. Technology of preventing and controlling mud losses into the permian igneous rocks in Shunbei oilfield[J]. Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid, 2018, 35(3):42-47.
    [15] 方俊伟,吕忠楷,何仲,等.化学凝胶堵剂承压堵漏技术在顺北3井的应用[J].钻井液与完井液, 2017, 34(6):13-17.

    FANG Junwei, LYU Zhongkai, HE Zhong, et al. Application of chemical gel LCM on well Shunbei-3[J]. Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid, 2017, 34(6):13-17.
    [16] 郭新健,于培志.抗高温化学凝胶堵漏技术在顺北52X井的应用[J].钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(2):189-193.

    GUO Xinjian, YU Peizhi. Controlling mud losses in well Shunbei 52X with high temperature chemical gels[J]. Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(2):189-193.
    [17] 赵小强.昭通页岩气示范区钻井井漏处理及预防措施[J].石化技术, 2018, 25(3):199-199.

    ZHAO Xiaoqiang. Treatment and preventive measures of circulation loss in Zhaotong shale gas demonstration area[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2018, 25(3):199-199.
    [18] 王中华.复杂漏失地层堵漏技术现状及发展方向[J].中外能源, 2014, 19(1):39-48.

    WANG Zhonghua. The status and development direction of plugging technology for complex formation lost circulation[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2014, 19(1):39-48.
    [19] 地调局勘探所.膨胀波纹管技术首次在页岩气井孔中成功护壁[J].地质装备, 2016, 17(5):9-9.

    Institute of Exploration Technology, China Geological Survey. The expansion bellows technology has successfully protected the side wall in the shale gas well for the first time[J]. Equipment for Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 17(5):9-9.
    [20] 黎凌,李巍,欧阳伟.遇水快速膨胀胶凝堵漏技术在长宁页岩气区块的应用[J].钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(2):181-188.

    LI Ling, LI Wei, OUYANG Wei. Application of a fastswelling lost circulation material in shale gas drilling in block Changning[J]. Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid, 2019, 36(2):181-188.
    [21] 李超,汤振强,杜玉磊.滇黔北昭通页岩气区块井漏认识及处理方案研究[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2017, 37(19):142-143.

    LI Chao, TANG Zhenqiang, DU Yulei. Study on circulation loss recognition and treatment scheme in Zhaotong shale gas block in north Yunnan and Guizhou province[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2017, 37(19):142-143.
    [22] 赵正国,蒲晓林,王贵,等.裂缝性漏失的桥塞堵漏钻井液技术[J].钻井液与完井液, 2012, 29(3):44-46.

    ZHAO Zhengguo, PU Xiaolin, WANG Gui, et al. Study on drilling fluid bridge plugging technology for fractured formation[J]. Drilling Fluid&Completion Fluid, 2012, 29(3):44-46.
    [23] 张敬荣.喷漏共存的堵漏压井技术[J].钻采工艺, 2008, 31(5):30-33.

    ZHANG Jingrong. Well killing technology for wells with blowout and lost circulation coexisting[J]. Drilling&Production Technology, 2008, 31(5):30-33.
    [24] 于延雄,代一钦.涪陵页岩气田油基钻井液防漏堵漏技术探讨[J].江汉石油科技, 2015, 25(1):33-36.

    YU Yanxiong, DAI Yiqin. Discussion on leak resistance and sealing technology of oil-based drilling fluid in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Jianghan Petroleum Science and Technology, 2015, 25(1):33-36.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  577
  • HTML全文浏览量:  169
  • PDF下载量:  199
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-10-15
  • 刊出日期:  2020-02-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    版权所有 《钻井液与完井液》津ICP备13002319号-1

    地址：河北省任丘市燕山南道渤海钻探工程院《钻井液与完井液》编辑部邮政编码：062552

    电话：（0317）2725487　2722354Email：zjyywjy@126.com

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计

    x 关闭 永久关闭

    祝贺《钻井液与完井液》入选2023年版北大核心期刊！