留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

顺北二叠系低压易漏井固井质量影响因素探讨

张俊,  杨谋,  李双贵,  刘泳敬,  路飞飞,  赫英状

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 钻井液与完井液  > 2019 >  36(4): 486-490
张俊, 杨谋, 李双贵, 刘泳敬, 路飞飞, 赫英状. 顺北二叠系低压易漏井固井质量影响因素探讨[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(4): 486-490. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.016
引用本文: 张俊, 杨谋, 李双贵, 刘泳敬, 路飞飞, 赫英状. 顺北二叠系低压易漏井固井质量影响因素探讨[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36(4): 486-490. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.016
shu
ZHANG Jun, YANG Mou, LI Shuanggui, LIU Yongjing, LU Feifei, HE Yingzhuang. Investigation of Factors Affecting Cementing Job Quality in Wells Penetrating Low Pressure Permian Formations Having Mud Loss Tendency in Shunbei Oilfield[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2019, 36(4): 486-490. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.016
Citation: ZHANG Jun, YANG Mou, LI Shuanggui, LIU Yongjing, LU Feifei, HE Yingzhuang. Investigation of Factors Affecting Cementing Job Quality in Wells Penetrating Low Pressure Permian Formations Having Mud Loss Tendency in Shunbei Oilfield[J]. DRILLING FLUID & COMPLETION FLUID, 2019, 36(4): 486-490. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.016
shu

顺北二叠系低压易漏井固井质量影响因素探讨

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2019.04.016

  • 1. 中国石化西北油田分公司工程技术研究院, 乌鲁木齐 830001;

  • 2. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 成都 610500;

  • 3. 渤海钻探工程有限公司第三钻井工程分公司, 天津 300280

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张俊,高级工程师,硕士,1982年生,2009年毕业于长江大学油气井专业,现从事油气井管理方面的工作。电话(0991)3161023;E-mail:289416250@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: TE256

Investigation of Factors Affecting Cementing Job Quality in Wells Penetrating Low Pressure Permian Formations Having Mud Loss Tendency in Shunbei Oilfield

  • 1. Research Center of Petroleum Engineering Technology, Sinopec Northwest Oilfield Company, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830001;

  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500;

  • 3. Third Drilling Engineering Branch, Bohai Drilling Engineering Limited Company of China National Petroleum Corporation, Tianjin 300280

    摘要
  • 摘要: 顺北油田二叠系地层孔隙裂缝发育，漏失压力低，完钻井固井漏失率为82%，井口反挤补救固井54.5%，导致固井质量不理想；为此，以该区域已施工井为参考依据，分别以地层承压能力识别方法、套管居中度评价方法、冲洗液紊流冲洗效果评价及井筒浆体匹配性计算为研究对象，系统分析了区域固井质量的内因。研究成果表明，二叠系地层漏失压力为62~67 MPa；在井径扩大率小于10%、井斜角低于0.3°时，扶正器间距可为55 m，而井眼质量较差时建议间距为22 m；前置液黏度偏高、隔离液与领浆性能参数不匹配导致前置液滞留井内，以及水泥浆提前返出井口，固井质量不理想。该研究成果为低压易漏地层漏失压降计算、扶正器安放间距设计及井筒浆体性能优化提供了系统研究的新思路，为解决该类固井难题提供了关键技术措施。

     

    Abstract: The Permian System formation in Shunbei oilfield is developed with fractures and has low leaking pressures, resulting in 82% of the wells experiencing lost circulation during well cementing and 54.5% of the wells had to be re-cemented through reverse squeezing of cement slurry. Cementing job quality has been unsatisfactory in the past. The internal causes affecting the quality of well cementing in the area was systematically analyzed using the methods such as identification of pressure bearing capacity of the formation, evaluation of the eccentricity of casing string, performance evaluation of a flushing fluid at turbulent flow and calculation of the compatibility between different slurries. It was found that the leaking pressure of the Permian System formation is between 62 MPa and 67 MPa. Distance between two centralizers can be 55 m when the percent hole enlargement is 10% and hole angle less than 0.3°. This distance is reduced to 22 m when the quality of the borehole is poor. Poor well cementing generally results because of high viscosity of prepad fluid, incompatibility between the parameters of spacer and lead slurry which results in retention of spacer in the hole, as well as cementing slurry returning to the surface ahead of time. This study has provided a new clue for calculating the leaking pressure of a formation with low pressure during cementing, designing the placement of centralizers and optimizing cement slurries, and presented a key technical measure to the similar well cementing problems.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(12)
  • [1] 刘崇建, 黄柏宗, 徐同台, 等. 油气井注水泥理论与应用[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2001:81-84. LIU Chongjian, HUANG Bozong, XU Tongtai, et al. Theory and application in oil and gas well cementing[M]. Beijing:Petroleum industry press, 2001:81

    -84.
    [2] 周剑, 高德伟, 严海兵. 早强低密度水泥浆体系提高低压易漏井固井质量[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(4):72-74.

    ZHOU Jian, GAO Dewei, YAN Haibing. A earlystrength and low-density slurry system used to improve cementing in low-pressure thief zones[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(4):72-74.
    [3] 石林, 蒋宏伟, 郭庆丰. 易漏地层的漏失压力分析[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2010, 32(3):40-44.

    SHI Lin, JIANG Hongwei, GUO Qingfeng. Analysis on the leakage pressure of thief formation[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2010, 32(3):40-44.
    [4] AADNOY B S, BELAYNEH M, ARRIADO M, et al. Design of well barriers to combat circulation losses[C]. SPE 105449, 2007.
    [5] 李大奇, 康毅力, 刘修善, 等. 基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5):900-904.

    LI Daqi, KANG Yili, LIU Xiushan, et al. The lost circulation pressure of carbonate formations on the basis of leakage mechanisms[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(5):900-904.
    [6] 李大奇. 裂缝性地层钻井液漏失动力学研究[D]. 西南石油大学, 2012. LI Daqi. Numerical and experimental investigations on drilling fluid losses in fractured formations[D]. Southwest petroleum university, 2012.
    [7] CHEN Y, YU M, MISKA S, et al. Fluid flow and heat transfer modeling in the event of lost circulation and its application in locating loss zones[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017(148):1-9.
    [8] FIDAN E, BABADAGLI T, KURU E. Use of cement as lost circulation material-field case studies[C]//IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2004.
    [9] BLANCO A, CICCOLA V, LIMONGI E. Casing centralization in horizontal and highly inclined wellbores[C]//IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2000.
    [10] 中国石油天然气总公司. SY/T 5334-1996套管扶正器安放间距计算方法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 1996. China national petroleum corporation. SY/T 5334-1996. Calculation method of the spaced interspacing for the casing centralizer[S].Beijing:China Standard Press, 1996.
    [11] 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 19139-2012油井水泥试验方法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2012. China national standardization administration. GB/T 19139-2012. Testing of well cements[S]. Beijing:China Standard Press, 2012.
    [12] 邓建民, 王永洪, 贾晓斌, 等. 注水泥流体密度与流变参数匹配的计算方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2011, 39(5):45-48.

    DENG Jianmin, WANG Yonghong, JIA Xiaobin, et al. The method to calculate cementing fluids' density and rheological parameters[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2011, 39(5):45-48.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  475
  • HTML全文浏览量:  160
  • PDF下载量:  235
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-02-05
  • 刊出日期:  2019-08-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    版权所有 《钻井液与完井液》津ICP备13002319号-1

    地址：河北省任丘市燕山南道渤海钻探工程院《钻井液与完井液》编辑部邮政编码：062552

    电话：（0317）2725487　2722354Email：zjyywjy@126.com

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计

    x 关闭 永久关闭

    祝贺《钻井液与完井液》入选2023年版北大核心期刊！